It is currently 11 Dec 2017, 20:00

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1469 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2009, 06:35
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

100% (00:05) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any food reported to contain a toxic chemical, even though the risk, as a mathematical ratio, might be minimal. With this mentality, Columbus would never have sailed west.
T: A risk-taker in one context can be risk-averse in another: the same person can drive recklessly, but refuse to eat food not grown organically.
T responds to S by showing that
(A) a distinction should be made between avoidable and unavoidable risks
(B) aversion to risk cannot be reliably assessed without reference to context
(C) there is confusion about risk in the minds of many members of the public
(D) mathematical odds concerning risk give an unwarranted impression of precision
(E) risk cannot be defined in relation to perceived probable benefit
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1469 [0], given: 1

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 30 Mar 2009
Posts: 248

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 1

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2009, 08:10
I choose A

S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any food reported to contain a toxic chemical, even though the risk, as a mathematical ratio, might be minimal. With this mentality, Columbus would never have sailed west.
T: A risk-taker in one context can be risk-averse in another: the same person can drive recklessly, but refuse to eat food not grown organically.
T responds to S by showing that
(A) a distinction should be made between avoidable and unavoidable risks -->the best. Driving has several potential & unavoidable risk, but organicaless food is an avoidable risk that we can avert. He means in such case when we can see the risk, we should prevent such case. But in case when there so many unavoidable risks, it's not necessary to avoid such situation
(B) aversion to risk cannot be reliably assessed without reference to context -->I think this is a trap. context is mentioned, but no mentions made about what is the reliability of the risk in particular contexts
(C) there is confusion about risk in the minds of many members of the public -->no
(D) mathematical odds concerning risk give an unwarranted impression of precision -->no
(E) risk cannot be defined in relation to perceived probable benefit -->no mentions about benefit

Kudos [?]: 207 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Oct 2006
Posts: 633

Kudos [?]: 654 [0], given: 6

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2009, 11:06
sondenso wrote:
S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any food reported to contain a toxic chemical, even though the risk, as a mathematical ratio, might be minimal. With this mentality, Columbus would never have sailed west.
T: A risk-taker in one context can be risk-averse in another: the same person can drive recklessly, but refuse to eat food not grown organically.
T responds to S by showing that
(A) a distinction should be made between avoidable and unavoidable risks
-- T never talked about avoid / un-avoid.
(B) aversion to risk cannot be reliably assessed without reference to context -- IMO
--
(C) there is confusion about risk in the minds of many members of the public -- OOS
(D) mathematical odds concerning risk give an unwarranted impression of precision---OOS
(E) risk cannot be defined in relation to perceived probable benefit

---OOS
_________________

If You're Not Living On The Edge, You're Taking Up Too Much Space

Kudos [?]: 654 [0], given: 6

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 May 2009
Posts: 168

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 3

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2009, 12:58
sondenso wrote:
S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any food reported to contain a toxic chemical, even though the risk, as a mathematical ratio, might be minimal. With this mentality, Columbus would never have sailed west.
T: A risk-taker in one context can be risk-averse in another: the same person can drive recklessly, but refuse to eat food not grown organically.
T responds to S by showing that
(A) a distinction should be made between avoidable and unavoidable risks
(B) aversion to risk cannot be reliably assessed without reference to context
(C) there is confusion about risk in the minds of many members of the public
(D) mathematical odds concerning risk give an unwarranted impression of precision
(E) risk cannot be defined in relation to perceived probable benefit


The word "context" makes me lean in favor of choice (B).

Both of T's examples are avoidable risks, so (A) is not the best description. (C) is possible logically, but was not articulated by T. (D) T never actively undermined the mathematics-based logic of S. (E) T never frames his argument in terms of cost-benefit analysis.

I think (B) is the most straightforward answer.

Kudos [?]: 30 [0], given: 3

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 04 May 2006
Posts: 1878

Kudos [?]: 1469 [0], given: 1

Schools: CBS, Kellogg
Premium Member
Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2009, 02:32
GMATaddict wrote:
The word "context" makes me lean in favor of choice (B).


Good tips

priyankur_saha@ml.com wrote:
(B) aversion to risk cannot be reliably assessed without reference to context -- IMO
!

Good point

OA is B
_________________

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1469 [0], given: 1

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jan 2008
Posts: 277

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2009, 08:00
T clearly starts by saying that risk has to be evaluated within its context. and gives an example to show his principle.
A careless driver can be reckless when it comes to driving -> not averse to risk
the same guy can be averse to eat organic food - >averse to risk.

from the above statements he clearly says that risk takers in one sense area averse to risk in another sense and appeals to S argument that the whole nation cannot be said averse to risk showing some are averse to eating food containing chemicals.

Clear Answer B

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 3

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2008
Posts: 800

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 May 2009, 14:31
clear B

Kudos [?]: 86 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 102

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jun 2009, 04:30
B here too

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 05 Apr 2007
Posts: 255

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 1

Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Jun 2009, 08:09
I'll choose B...This is the one that is relating risk to context...
_________________

Choose Life

Kudos [?]: 96 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 806

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 106

WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: Averse to risk [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2009, 12:06
IMO B


---
(0:49)
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Kudos [?]: 391 [0], given: 106

Re: Averse to risk   [#permalink] 16 Jun 2009, 12:06
Display posts from previous: Sort by

S: Our nation is becoming too averse to risk. We boycott any

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.