Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59590

Question Stats:
41% (02:28) correct 59% (01:39) wrong based on 86 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If \(p\), \(q\), \(r\), and \(s\) are consecutive integers, with \(p \lt q \lt r \lt s\), is \(pr \lt qs\)? (1) \(pq \lt rs\) (2) \(ps \lt qr\)
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59590

Re: S9918
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Sep 2014, 01:53
Official Solution: We can solve this problem either by algebra or by numberplugging. Let's use algebra. All four variables can be expressed in terms of just one variable, since they are consecutive integers and we know their order. If we keep \(p\) as the basic variable, then \(q = p + 1\), \(r = p + 2\), and \(s = p + 3\). Now we can rephrase the question: Is \(pr \lt qs\)? Is \(p(p + 2) \lt (p + 1)(p + 3)\)? Is \(p^2 + 2p \lt p^2 + 4p + 3\)? Is \(2p \lt 4p + 3\)? Is \(0 \lt 2p + 3\)? Is \(3 \lt 2p\)? Is \(\frac{3}{2} \lt p\)? Since \(p\) is an integer, the question is answered "yes" if \(p = 1\) or greater, and "no" if \(p = 2\) or less. Statement (1): SUFFICIENT. We rephrase the statement similarly. \(pq \lt rs\) \(p(p + 1) \lt (p + 2)(p + 3)\) \(p^2 + p \lt p^2 + 5p + 6\) \(0 \lt 4p + 6\) \(0 \lt 2p + 3\) \(\frac{3}{2} \lt p\) This is precisely the same condition as asked in the question. Thus, we can answer the question definitively. Statement (2): INSUFFICIENT. Again, we rephrase the statement similarly. \(ps \lt qr\) \(p(p + 3) \lt (p + 1)(p + 2)\) \(p^2 + 3p \lt p^2 + 3p + 2\) \(0 \lt 2\) Since 0 is always less than 2, no matter the value of \(p\), the statement is always true. Thus, we do not gain any information that would help us answer the question. Answer: A
_________________



Intern
Joined: 19 Aug 2014
Posts: 2
Location: United States
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
WE: Other (Other)

Re: S9918
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Oct 2014, 02:41
We can solve this problem either by algebra or by numberplugging. Let's use algebra. All four variables can be expressed in terms of just one variable, since they are consecutive integers and we know their order. If we keep p as the basic variable,
Bunuel  how do you suggest to solve this by number plugging.
Also im not great at using number plugging to solve questions and generally take the algaebric ways which costs me more time and is very unfeasibe in some questions.
Are you aware of a bank of questions for me to practice number plugging and also some tips and tricks about the same. Thanks in advance . You are a saviour.



Intern
Joined: 27 Jan 2016
Posts: 6
Location: India
GPA: 4

Re: S9918
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Oct 2016, 08:13
Shoudn't the question have specified that the integers can't be 0?



Intern
Joined: 17 Oct 2014
Posts: 5

Re: S9918
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 02:53
if we use number plugging method the ans will be B 1st statement: pq<rs let the values be 1,2,3,4 then 2<12 its true. assumen values be 2,1,0,1 then 2>0 the statement is not sufficient.
2nd statement: ps<qr values be 1,2,3,4 then 4<6 true. values be 2,1,0,1 then 2<0 hence statement is sufficient. please help me where i am wrong



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59590

Re: S9918
[#permalink]
Show Tags
25 Nov 2016, 06:17
pratistha29 wrote: if we use number plugging method the ans will be B 1st statement: pq<rs let the values be 1,2,3,4 then 2<12 its true. assumen values be 2,1,0,1 then 2>0 the statement is not sufficient.
2nd statement: ps<qr values be 1,2,3,4 then 4<6 true. values be 2,1,0,1 then 2<0 hence statement is sufficient. please help me where i am wrong With 1,2,3,4 you have and YES answer to the question (\(pr \lt qs\)) while with 2,1,0,1 you get a NO answer to the question (\(pr \gt qs\)). This means that the second statement is not sufficient.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 11 Aug 2018
Posts: 7

Re: S9918
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Oct 2018, 12:53
If we wish to use number plugging, then we have to consider 4 different cases for values for p q r s.
Case 1 : 1, 2, 3, 4
Case 2 : 4, 3, 2, 1
Case 3 : 2, 1, 0, 1
Case 4 : 1, 0, 1, 2
[NOTICE the difference between case 3 and 4 carefully]
Now, check for statement 1 : pq<rs
For all the cases for which pq<rs holds true, pr<qs should give the same answer [either YES or NO]. Here, it does. Hence, SUFFICIENT.
Now, check for statement 2 : ps<qr
Here, all the cases for which ps<qr holds true donot give the same answer to 'Is pr<qs ?'. Hence, INSUFFICIENT.
Therefore, the answer ====> A










