D is the right answer.Sally's argument:
Premise: I cannot study at a university where there is an alcohol problem.
Conclusion: So unless something is done about the alcohol problem at this university, I’ll have to transfer to a university where there are no fraternities.
Yolanda's argument:
Premise: I don’t agree that fraternities are responsible for the alcohol problem at this university. Alcohol problems exist at all universities, including those where there are no fraternities. We all should become more aware of alcohol abuse.
Conclusion: It’s not simply a fraternity problem; it’s a cultural problem.
We are to determine from the answer choices what Yolanda did in her argument. Simply put, which answer choice mostly mimics the conclusion drawn by Yolanda.
(A) She argues that if people become more aware of alcohol abuse, fewer people will themselves abuse alcohol.
This is incorrect. The conclusion of her argument is that alcohol is not simply a fraternity problem; it's a cultural problem. Based on this conclusion, we are unable to determine whether fewer people will abuse alcohol when they become aware of alcohol abuse.
(B) She makes an overly broad generalization from one university to all universities.
This is incorrect. The conclusion of Yolanda's argument cannot be construed as an overly broad generalization. She did not base her argument on what occurs at one university and generalize it to other universities. We are unsure whether she has specific data, which could be from just one university or from many universities, to support her claim.
(C) She concludes that because alcohol problems are cultural problems, they cannot be fraternity problems.
No, this is not her conclusion. She actually concludes that alcohol is not
simply a fraternity problem, it is a cultural problem. From this, we can see that her point is that alcohol may be partly a fraternity problem, but it is more of a cultural problem.
(D) She tries to undermine what she supposes to be Sally’s position by pointing out that alcohol problems occur even at universities where there are no fraternities.
This is correct. She supposes that Sally has the view that universities without fraternities may not have alcohol problems; hence part of the conclusion of Yolanda's argument states that
alcohol is not simply a fraternity problem. The other part of her conclusion states that
alcohol is a cultural problem, implying that there is an alcohol problem in universities without fraternities.
(E) She suggests that even if alcohol problems existed only at universities with fraternities, she would still conclude that alcoholism is a cultural rather than a fraternity problem.
No, this is not the main point of her argument. From her conclusion, she acknowledged that fraternities also play a role as far as alcoholism in universities is concerned. She only stated that alcohol is mainly a cultural problem and not simply/just/only a fraternity problem.