GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 07 Dec 2019, 02:58

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 15
Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 02 Oct 2010, 13:41
4
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  65% (hard)

Question Stats:

58% (02:16) correct 42% (01:57) wrong based on 203 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1 percent simple interest annually, and she invests i2 dollars in bond Y, which pays r2 percent simple interest annually. After one year, will she have earned more interest, in dollars, from bond X than from bond Y ?

(1) \((r1)^2 > (r2)^2\)
(2) The ratio of i1 to i2 is larger than the ratio of r1 to r2 .


Why cant 1 be sufficient .
We know that interest cannot be negative , therefore (1) eventually leads to r1> r2 .
The values of i1 and I2 don’t matter , because even when i2 is greater than i1 , the interest would be less .Eg. i1 : 100 r1: 5% , i2: 150 , r2: 3% , i1r1 > i2r2 giving the required result .

Originally posted by nandini11 on 02 Oct 2010, 11:56.
Last edited by nandini11 on 02 Oct 2010, 13:41, edited 1 time in total.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 02 Sep 2010
Posts: 717
Location: London
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 12:33
nandini11 wrote:
Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X , which pays r1 percent simple interest annually, and she invests i2 dollars in bond Y , which pays r2 percent simple interest annually. After one year, will she have earned more interest, in dollars, from bond X than from bond Y ?
1. \((r1)^2 > (r2)^2\)
2. The ratio of i1 to i2 is larger than the ratio of r1 to r2 .


Why cant 1 be sufficient .
We know that interest cannot be negative , therefore (1) eventually leads to r1> r2 .
The values of i1 and I2 don’t matter , because even when i2 is greater than i1 , the interest would be less .Eg. i1 : 100 r1: 5% , i2: 150 , r2: 3% , i1r1 > i2r2 giving the required result .

OA


Interest from bond X : i1*r1/100
Interest from bond Y : i2*r2/100
we need to know if i1*r1 > i2*r2 ?

(1) r1^2 > r2^2 ... Not sufficient as it doesn't tell us anything about the actual amounts invested
(2) i1/i2 > r1/r2 which implies i1*r2 > i2*r1 ... doesnt help us solve our inequality
(1+2) r1^2 > r2^2
So r1 > r2 as interest rate on bond cannot be negative
i1*r1 > i1*r2
i2*r1 > i2*r2
Combining with condition known from Statement 2, we get i1*r1 > i2*r2

Answer is (C)

sibanmishra wrote:
Well..i think the answer is E. Because in bonds the interest can be -ve and a variable one.


Bonds can't have negative interest. Variable is irrelevant here as we are given it is fixed
_________________
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59587
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 13:24
3
nandini11 wrote:
Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X , which pays r1 percent simple interest annually, and she invests i2 dollars in bond Y , which pays r2 percent simple interest annually. After one year, will she have earned more interest, in dollars, from bond X than from bond Y ?
1. \((r1)^2 > (r2)^2\)
2. The ratio of i1 to i2 is larger than the ratio of r1 to r2 .


Why cant 1 be sufficient .
We know that interest cannot be negative , therefore (1) eventually leads to r1> r2 .
The values of i1 and I2 don’t matter , because even when i2 is greater than i1 , the interest would be less .Eg. i1 : 100 r1: 5% , i2: 150 , r2: 3% , i1r1 > i2r2 giving the required result .

OA


First of all: "bond X pays r1 percent simple interest annually" --> so r1 and r2 can not be negative.

After 1 year bond X will earn \(i_1*\frac{r_1}{100}\) and bond Y \(i_2*\frac{r_2}{100}\).

So the question is \(i_1*\frac{r_1}{100}>i_2*\frac{r_2}{100}\)? --> is \(i_1*r_1>i_2*r_2\)?

(1) \((r_1)^2>(r_2)^2\) --> not sufficient as no info about \(i_1\) and \(i_2\).
(2) The ratio of i1 to i2 is larger than the ratio of r1 to r2 --> \(\frac{i_1}{i_2}>\frac{r_1}{r_2}\) --> \(i_1*r_2>i_2*r_1\). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) From (1) \((r_1)^2>(r_2)^2\) --> \(r_1>r_2\) --> \(\frac{r_1}{r_2}>1\) --> so \(\frac{i_1}{i_2}>\frac{r_1}{r_2}>1\) --> \(\frac{i_1}{i_2}>1\) --> \(i_1>i_2\). So as both \(r_1>r_2\) and \(i_1>i_2\) then \(i_1*r_1>i_2*r_2\). Sufficient.

Or: as both part in both inequalities (\((r_1)^2>(r_2)^2\) and \(i_1*r_2>i_2*r_1\)) are positive then we can multiply them: \((r_1)^2*i_1*r_2>(r_2)^2*i_2*r_1\) --> reduce by \(r_1r_2\) --> \(i_1*r_1>i_2*r_2\). Sufficient.

Answer: C.
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
Status: yet to apply
Joined: 05 Jun 2010
Posts: 14
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 13:26
Well..No one till now commented on the possibility of negative interest rate??
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Status: Nothing comes easy: neither do I want.
Joined: 12 Oct 2009
Posts: 2478
Location: Malaysia
Concentration: Technology, Entrepreneurship
Schools: ISB '15 (M)
GMAT 1: 670 Q49 V31
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V35
Reviews Badge
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 13:33
sibanmishra wrote:
Well..No one till now commented on the possibility of negative interest rate??


-ve interest rates are not possible for such investment. Do not over generalize the things on gmat.
_________________
Fight for your dreams :For all those who fear from Verbal- lets give it a fight

Money Saved is the Money Earned :)

Jo Bole So Nihaal , Sat Shri Akaal

:thanks Support GMAT Club by putting a GMAT Club badge on your blog/Facebook :thanks

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Gmat test review :
http://gmatclub.com/forum/670-to-710-a-long-journey-without-destination-still-happy-141642.html
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59587
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 13:33
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 15
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 13:52
Hello Bunuel , Shrouded1 ,
What abt the following consideration .
from (1) we know r1 > r2 so irrespective of i1 being greater or less than i2 , we would know that i1*r1 yields high value .
Example
Consider i1 > i2 (and we know r1 >r2 and i1 and i2 have to be positive values ).
say i1 : 150 , i2 : 100
Value of Inv on X : i1*r1 : 150*5% : 7.5
Value of Inv on Y : i2*r2 : 100*3% : 3
Therefore X > Y
Take the other case of i1< i2 ( and still r1 >r2 and i1 and i2 have to be positive values ).
Say i1 : 100 , i2 : 150
Value of Inv on X : i1*r1 : 100*5% : 5
Value of Inv on Y : i2*r2 : 150*3% : 4.5
So it does not matter what is the principle amount hence (A) or stmnt 1 is sufficient .
Where am I going wrong ?

PS : Gurpreet I have corrected the OA .Sorry abt that .
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59587
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 14:05
nandini11 wrote:
Hello Bunuel , Shrouded1 ,
What abt the following consideration .
from (1) we know r1 > r2 so irrespective of i1 being greater or less than i2 , we would know that i1*r1 yields high value .
Example
Consider i1 > i2 (and we know r1 >r2 and i1 and i2 have to be positive values ).
say i1 : 150 , i2 : 100
Value of Inv on X : i1*r1 : 150*5% : 7.5
Value of Inv on Y : i2*r2 : 100*3% : 3
Therefore X > Y
Take the other case of i1< i2 ( and still r1 >r2 and i1 and i2 have to be positive values ).
Say i1 : 100 , i2 : 150
Value of Inv on X : i1*r1 : 100*5% : 5
Value of Inv on Y : i2*r2 : 150*3% : 4.5
So it does not matter what is the principle amount hence (A) or stmnt 1 is sufficient .
Where am I going wrong ?

PS : Gurpreet I have corrected the OA .Sorry abt that .


That's not correct. Are you saying that interest earned depends only on interest rate?

So if I ask you what would you prefer 1% annual interest from $1,000,000,000 or 100% annual interest from $1?
_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 248
Location: USA
WE 1: Engineering
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 14:31
Quote:
That's not correct. Are you saying that interest earned depends only on interest rate?

So if I ask you what would you prefer 1% annual interest from $1,000,000,000 or 100% annual interest from $1?


Bunuel, I will be more than happy to accept the former with only 0.25% :lol:
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 08 Nov 2009
Posts: 15
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 14:32
I get it now .My choice of plugin numbers was not comprehensive enuf .
Thanks a lot Bunuel .
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jun 2009
Posts: 248
Location: USA
WE 1: Engineering
Re: GMAT Club Test -MGMAT Challenge Test 1- DS Question(#5)  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Oct 2010, 14:38
nandini11 wrote:
Hello Bunuel , Shrouded1 ,
What abt the following consideration .
from (1) we know r1 > r2 so irrespective of i1 being greater or less than i2 , we would know that i1*r1 yields high value .
Example
Consider i1 > i2 (and we know r1 >r2 and i1 and i2 have to be positive values ).
say i1 : 150 , i2 : 100
Value of Inv on X : i1*r1 : 150*5% : 7.5
Value of Inv on Y : i2*r2 : 100*3% : 3
Therefore X > Y
Take the other case of i1< i2 ( and still r1 >r2 and i1 and i2 have to be positive values ).
Say i1 : 100 , i2 : 150
Value of Inv on X : i1*r1 : 100*5% : 5
Value of Inv on Y : i2*r2 : 150*3% : 4.5
So it does not matter what is the principle amount hence (A) or stmnt 1 is sufficient .
Where am I going wrong ?

PS : Gurpreet I have corrected the OA .Sorry abt that .


Nandini, the numbers you have taken in this particular case are playing the trick. In your example, the ratio of the R's and I's are peculiar.

Take extreme example. If you think i1 & i2 do not matter. Do this:

Case 1
i1=$10000 and i2=$100
r1=5% and r2=4.99% .. as a result r1>r2
Value of return ......... X = 10000*5% = $500
Y = 100*4.99% = $4.99
X >> Y

Case 2
i1=$100 and i2=$10000
r1=5% and r2=4.99% .. as a result r1>r2
Value of return ......... X = 100*5% = $5
Y = 10000*4.99% = $499
X << Y
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 10 Dec 2013
Posts: 14
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
Schools: ISB '16 (S)
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.9
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Mar 2014, 14:03
Can the rates R1 and R2 be fractions? In that case R1^2 > R2^2 would not necessarily mean R1>R2. :shock:
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 59587
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Mar 2014, 04:26
Rohan_Kanungo wrote:
Can the rates R1 and R2 be fractions? In that case R1^2 > R2^2 would not necessarily mean R1>R2. :shock:


Actually it would.

For non-negative \(x\) and \(y\) if \(x^2>y^2\), then \(x>y\): since both sides of \(x^2>y^2\) are non-negative we can take the square root from both sides and get \(x>y\).

Adding/subtracting/multiplying/dividing inequalities: help-with-add-subtract-mult-divid-multiple-inequalities-155290.html



Hope it helps.
_________________
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 06 Sep 2013
Posts: 1545
Concentration: Finance
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2014, 09:06
Is i1r1>i2r2?

Statement 1

ri>r2

This is clearly insufficient

Statement 2

i1/i2>r1/r2

i1r2>r1i2.

Insufficient on its own

Now both together

i1r2>r1i2
r1>r2

Multiplying inequalities since we know both sides are positive then simplifying we get

i2>i2

Since we know that r1>r2 as well then

i1r1>i2r2

Sufficient

C

Hope this helps
Cheers
J
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Everyone is a leader. Just stop listening to others.
Joined: 22 Mar 2013
Posts: 699
Location: India
GPA: 3.51
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Reviews Badge
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Apr 2014, 09:48
Read to eat stuff: it will refresh your concept and keep you away from any confusion during exam.
Kudos me if it is helpful.
Attachment:
Ratio properties.jpg
Ratio properties.jpg [ 81.01 KiB | Viewed 3217 times ]
Math Revolution GMAT Instructor
User avatar
V
Joined: 16 Aug 2015
Posts: 8235
GMAT 1: 760 Q51 V42
GPA: 3.82
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Apr 2018, 23:08
nandini11 wrote:
Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1 percent simple interest annually, and she invests i2 dollars in bond Y, which pays r2 percent simple interest annually. After one year, will she have earned more interest, in dollars, from bond X than from bond Y ?

(1) \((r1)^2 > (r2)^2\)
(2) The ratio of i1 to i2 is larger than the ratio of r1 to r2 .


Why cant 1 be sufficient .
We know that interest cannot be negative , therefore (1) eventually leads to r1> r2 .
The values of i1 and I2 don’t matter , because even when i2 is greater than i1 , the interest would be less .Eg. i1 : 100 r1: 5% , i2: 150 , r2: 3% , i1r1 > i2r2 giving the required result .


Forget conventional ways of solving math questions. For DS problems, the VA (Variable Approach) method is the quickest and easiest way to find the answer without actually solving the problem. Remember that equal numbers of variables and independent equations ensure a solution.

Since we have 4 variables (i1, i2, r1 and r2) and 0 equations, E is most likely to be the answer. So, we should consider conditions 1) & 2) together first. After comparing the number of variables and the number of equations, we can save time by considering conditions 1) & 2) together first.

Conditions 1) and 2):
Since r1 and r2 are positive, (r1)^2 > (r2)^2 implies r1 > r2 or r1/r2 > 1.
Since i1/i2 > r1/r2 from the condition 2), i1/i2 > r1/r2 > 1 implies i1/i2 > 1 or i1 > i2.
i1 * r1 > i2 * r2.
Thus the interest from the bond X is more than the interest from the bond Y.

Both conditions together are sufficient.

Therefore, C is the answer.

In cases where 3 or more additional equations are required, such as for original conditions with “3 variables”, or “4 variables and 1 equation”, or “5 variables and 2 equations”, conditions 1) and 2) usually supply only one additional equation. Therefore, there is an 80% chance that E is the answer, a 15% chance that C is the answer, and a 5% chance that the answer is A, B or D. Since E (i.e. conditions 1) & 2) are NOT sufficient, when taken together) is most likely to be the answer, it is generally most efficient to begin by checking the sufficiency of conditions 1) and 2), when taken together. Obviously, there may be occasions on which the answer is A, B, C or D.
_________________
MathRevolution: Finish GMAT Quant Section with 10 minutes to spare
The one-and-only World’s First Variable Approach for DS and IVY Approach for PS with ease, speed and accuracy.
"Only $79 for 1 month Online Course"
"Free Resources-30 day online access & Diagnostic Test"
"Unlimited Access to over 120 free video lessons - try it yourself"
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 13722
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Aug 2019, 09:35
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1   [#permalink] 01 Aug 2019, 09:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Samantha invests i1 dollars in bond X, which pays r1

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne