Braintree
@
e-gmatHi Abhishek,
Thanks for the clear and concise explanation. I have a follow-up question. When you say -
"A subordinating conjunction is always considered a part of the Dependent Clause; whereas a coordinating conjunction (FANBOYS) is not considered a part of the clauses it connects.",
What are the implications of this concept in constructing sentences? How might the GMAT trip us? (Again, say within the context of 'For' vs 'Because').
Thanks a lot for clarifying!
bt
Hey
BraintreeThere are several ways the GMAT can trap us with the words 'for' and 'because', either independently or together. Here are a few off the top of my head:
1. "For" as conjunction Vs "For" as preposition:
The conjunction 'for' is followed by a clause that gives us the reason for another clause, whereas the preposition 'for' is followed by an object noun and is used to convey purpose/intent, duration, distance, belonging, etc.
2. "For" as conjunction Vs "So" as conjunction:
"For" introduces a clause of reason, whereas 'so' introduces a clause of 'result' or 'consequence'.
3. "For" as conjunction Vs "because" as conjunction:
The coordinating conjunction 'for' must be preceded by a comma, whereas the subordinating conjunction 'because' need not be preceded by a comma. Moreover, "for" could be replaced with a semi-colon and the two ICs could be placed one after another without a conjunction. "Because", on the other hand, cannot be omitted from the sentence let alone be replaced with a semi-colon.
For example:
a. Tom cannot come along for he has no money. (correct)
b. Tom cannot come along; he has no money. (correct)
c. Tom cannot come along because he has no money.
(correct)
4. "Because" Vs "because of":
"Because" is a conjunction that begins a DC, whereas "because of" is a phrasal preposition that takes a noun object.
I hope the above helps improve your understanding. Try to come up with examples for each of the above to cement your learning. Feel free to revert for verification.
Happy Learning!
Abhishek