EducationAisle
chenkc805
I thought so too but this OG question proves me wrong
Hi
chenkc805, not really.
In this OG question, with option C, the sentence is:
Chinese public buildings erected under a construction code of the Sung dynasty have withstood earthquakes well because the white cedar that was used in them has four times the tensile strength steel has, and the timber frame, incorporating many joints and few nails, is flexible.
Official explanation of why C is wrong:
The comma after has breaks up the sentence in such a way that only the great tensile strength of white cedar is offered as an explanation of the buildings' ability to withstand earthquakes, rather than both white cedar's tensile strength and the timber frame's flexibility. The statement regarding the timber frame's flexibility is mentioned simply as a separate fact not falling under the scope of because.Notice that OG does
not point to any errors in the comparison construct of this option. So, C is correct from a comparison perspective.
What about option B? I don't see how Option B is technically wrong. Is it because "used in them" is ambiguous, since "them" could refer to Chinese public buildings or earthquakes?
For reference:
Option B: (B) used in them has four times the tensile strength of steel has and the timber frame, incorporating
Option B in the sentence: Chinese public buildings erected under a construction code of the Sung dynasty have withstood earthquakes well because the white cedar
used in them has four times the tensile strength of steel has and the timber frame, incorporating many joints and few nails, is flexible.