|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
04 Aug 2019, 07:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
78% (01:48) correct
22%
(02:17)
wrong
based on 564
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Science journalist: Europa, a moon of Jupiter, is covered with ice. Data recently transmitted by a spacecraft strongly suggest that there are oceans of liquid water deep under the ice. Life as we know it could evolve only in the presence of liquid water. Hence, it is likely that at least primitive life has evolved on Europa.
The science journalist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
(A) takes for granted that if a condition would be necessary for the evolution of life as we know it, then such life could not have evolved anywhere that this condition does not hold
(B) fails to address adequately the possibility that there are conditions necessary for the evolution of life in addition to the presence of liquid water
(C) takes for granted that life is likely to be present on Europa if, but only if, life evolved on Europa
(D) overlooks the possibility that there could be unfamiliar forms of life that have evolved without the presence of liquid water
(E) takes for granted that no conditions on Europa other than the supposed presence of liquid water could have accounted for the data transmitted by the spacecraft
The science journalist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
(A) takes for granted that if a condition would be necessary for the evolution of life as we know it, then such life could not have evolved anywhere that this condition does not hold
(B) fails to address adequately the possibility that there are conditions necessary for the evolution of life in addition to the presence of liquid water
(C) takes for granted that life is likely to be present on Europa if, but only if, life evolved on Europa
(D) overlooks the possibility that there could be unfamiliar forms of life that have evolved without the presence of liquid water
(E) takes for granted that no conditions on Europa other than the supposed presence of liquid water could have accounted for the data transmitted by the spacecraft
06 Aug 2019, 09:14
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hovkial
Structure of science journalist's statement:
"Liquid water was found on Europa. We know that life can evolve only if there is liquid water. Hence I conclude that life has evolved on Europa."
Clearly, the journalist has made a leap of faith. Although water is essential for life, it may not be the only attribute required for life to evolve.
The relation between the premise - "water was found" - and conclusion - "hence life exists" does not naturally follow because other important elements are ignored.
Based on the disconnection between premise and conclusion, the question now becomes easy to answer.
(A) takes for granted that if a condition would be necessary for the evolution of life as we know it, then such life could not have evolved anywhere that this condition does not hold
INCORRECT
There is no claim about evolution of life elsewhere but on Europa. Notice the double negatives that are included to cause confusion.
(B) fails to address adequately the possibility that there are conditions necessary for the evolution of life in addition to the presence of liquid water
CORRECT
Directly address the disconnection between premise and conclusion.
(C) takes for granted that life is likely to be present on Europa if, but only if, life evolved on Europa
INCORRECT
Circular argument that is unrelated to the premise. Addresses irrelevant point.
(D) overlooks the possibility that there could be unfamiliar forms of life that have evolved without the presence of liquid water
INCORRECT
Addresses irrelevant points. There could well be unfamiliar forms of life that could have evolved without water, but this subject is not considered in original statement.
(E) takes for granted that no conditions on Europa other than the supposed presence of liquid water could have accounted for the data transmitted by the spacecraft
INCORRECT
Addresses irrelevant points. Life could have evolved on Europa without water, but this subject is not considered in original statement.
20 Apr 2023, 08:46
Kudos
Bookmarks
Science journalist: Europa, a moon of Jupiter, is covered with ice. Data recently transmitted by a spacecraft strongly suggest that there are oceans of liquid water deep under the ice. Life as we know it could evolve only in the presence of liquid water. Hence, it is likely that at least primitive life has evolved on Europa.
The science journalist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
(A) takes for granted that if a condition would be necessary for the evolution of life as we know it, then such life could not have evolved anywhere that this condition does not hold - WRONG. Too much confusing. But the highlighted part ruins it. Are we concerned of planet or other heavenly bodies where conditions are not met? No.!!
(B) fails to address adequately the possibility that there are conditions necessary for the evolution of life in addition to the presence of liquid water - CORRECT.
(C) takes for granted that life is likely to be present on Europa if, but only if, life evolved on Europa - WRONG. Plain irrelevant.
(D) overlooks the possibility that there could be unfamiliar forms of life that have evolved without the presence of liquid water - WRONG. Irrelevant.
(E) takes for granted that no conditions on Europa other than the supposed presence of liquid water could have accounted for the data transmitted by the spacecraft - WRONG. Possibly an assumption but not a weakener.
Additional info strengthens or weakens and this is the perfect example of that.
Answer B.
The science journalist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that it
(A) takes for granted that if a condition would be necessary for the evolution of life as we know it, then such life could not have evolved anywhere that this condition does not hold - WRONG. Too much confusing. But the highlighted part ruins it. Are we concerned of planet or other heavenly bodies where conditions are not met? No.!!
(B) fails to address adequately the possibility that there are conditions necessary for the evolution of life in addition to the presence of liquid water - CORRECT.
(C) takes for granted that life is likely to be present on Europa if, but only if, life evolved on Europa - WRONG. Plain irrelevant.
(D) overlooks the possibility that there could be unfamiliar forms of life that have evolved without the presence of liquid water - WRONG. Irrelevant.
(E) takes for granted that no conditions on Europa other than the supposed presence of liquid water could have accounted for the data transmitted by the spacecraft - WRONG. Possibly an assumption but not a weakener.
Additional info strengthens or weakens and this is the perfect example of that.
Answer B.
