Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
What role does the word 'which' following the preposition 'to' plays in the following sentence:
The tidal forces to which an object falling into a black hole is submitted are sufficient to tear the object apart
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
The word "which" is a pronoun. Technically, it is a relative pronoun. Its job is to open a subordinate clause, a noun-modifying clause. The pronoun "which" always refers to the target noun that the clause is modifying.
First, let's look at that sentence without the noun-modifying clause at all. (1) The tidal forces are sufficient to tear the object apart. That's 100% grammatically correct, but it leaves us a little in the dark. Which tidal forces? We are missing some context.
We could turn the noun modifying clause into its own sentence, and then follow it with a sentence similar to (1). (2) An object falling into a black hole is submitted to tidal forces. (3) These tidal forces are sufficient to tear the object apart. Again, all this is 100% grammatically correct. It now provides context and tells a story. The problem is that these two sentences have a cookbook simplicity to it, as if this were appearing in a child's report on black holes. It is artlessly factual, the way children write.
It would be far more elegant to combine these into a single sentence. In this combined sentence, (1) will be the independent clause, and the information in (2) will be used in an noun-modifying clause. The target noun of this clause will the subject of (1), "tidal forces." Since this noun is the object of the preposition "to" in setnence (2), the relatively pronoun will have to take on this same role. Thus, the noun modifying clause will begin with the structure "to which." (4) The tidal forces to which an object falling into a black hole is submitted are sufficient to tear the object apart. That is a high quality sentence and could be the correct answer on a GMAT SC question.
Does all this make sense? Mike
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.