Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 15:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 15:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
Boat Meadow
Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Last visit: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
6
 [5]
Posts: 4
Kudos: 6
 [5]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
1,705
 [4]
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
tkkoh
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Last visit: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
23
 [2]
Posts: 412
Kudos: 23
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Boat Meadow
Joined: 13 Feb 2006
Last visit: 17 Oct 2012
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
6
 [1]
Posts: 4
Kudos: 6
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
While I agree that better money can be made in the non-education sector I believe most don't realize how much you can actually earn in the education market. I had a conversation with a MIS department head about a month ago at a Tier 2 B-school and he told me that starting salaries for new tenure-track positions is up around $90-100K and there are some at the school (obviously with lots of experience) making well over $200K teaching and at least that consulting on the side. I just want folks to realize that the demand is there and you can make an ok living teaching.
User avatar
Chapman
Joined: 19 Jul 2005
Last visit: 11 Dec 2006
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 36
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You're saying this professor is making somewhere around $400K a year? I'd say that's an ok living...

Do professors commonly engage in consulting/side work?
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
1,705
 [2]
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Money and your qualifications absolutely go hand in hand. Have 1 publication and 2 papers under review (mutliple authors is just fine) and you will be a great great bet for any university. Also, take an extra year if you can and get to the 1 pub + 2 in review stage. This will not only help you get to a decent research oriented school , but will also give a heck of a head start in the process of gettting tenure.

When targeting publications, start with the top journals. Remember you are training yourself so that you can get tenure, not just a Ph.D. Be willing to dive into for example, Management Science articles and try to replicate results wherever possible.

Many professors make a lot of money from consulting. A side benefit is that you get a lot of real problems to work on , not only for yourself , but also for your graduate students. This translates into a lot of research opportunities and hence more publications.


Praetorian
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
1,705
 [1]
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Chapman
You're saying this professor is making somewhere around $400K a year? I'd say that's an ok living...

Do professors commonly engage in consulting/side work?


$400K for a professor is actually very very good.

I am sure many professors make more than that with consulting projects. Many have their own consulting firms. I am guessing the consulting projects start after tenure. Unless the projects lead to a big grant, they may not be too valuable as far as tenure is concerned.

If you have worked in corporations, $400K doesnt sound as attractive. But factor in the lifestyle and its a whole lot different.
User avatar
maneeshkumar
Joined: 30 Jan 2005
Last visit: 01 Sep 2006
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
5
 [2]
Location: INDIA
Posts: 23
Kudos: 5
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys i would do a PHD more for love of it than for money.
User avatar
GMAT TIGER
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,013
Own Kudos:
1,783
 [2]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1,013
Kudos: 1,783
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
maneeshkumar
Guys i would do a PHD more for love of it than for money.


Exactly. People in the US/west evaluate everything with money but in the east (basically in South Asia) the same is not the case. People in the east value the degree with knowledge and education.
avatar
cabro57
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Last visit: 14 Jun 2016
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
52
 [2]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 195
Kudos: 52
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMAT TIGER
Exactly. People in the US/west evaluate everything with money but in the east (basically in South Asia) the same is not the case. People in the east value the degree with knowledge and education.


I'm not sure such blanket generalizations help. Where are you going with this purely racist stuff? I'm not Asian, and I chose to go the PhD path, and I know for a fact that there are plenty of people in my position..
User avatar
Praetorian
Joined: 15 Aug 2003
Last visit: 27 Dec 2017
Posts: 2,868
Own Kudos:
1,705
 [1]
Given Kudos: 781
Posts: 2,868
Kudos: 1,705
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cabro57
GMAT TIGER
Exactly. People in the US/west evaluate everything with money but in the east (basically in South Asia) the same is not the case. People in the east value the degree with knowledge and education.

I'm not sure such blanket generalizations help. Where are you going with this purely racist stuff? I'm not Asian, and I chose to go the PhD path, and I know for a fact that there are plenty of people in my position..


Agreed. Those comments were unnecessary.
avatar
tkkoh
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Last visit: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
23
 [2]
Posts: 412
Kudos: 23
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The comment by GMAT TIGER is neither necessary nor representative. I have talked to Asians who emphasized about where/how to get good money post-PhD. I have spoken to Westerners in my PhD program who really show a passion for academia. One guy just completed his MBA but immediately continued on with a PhD program.
User avatar
hobbit
Joined: 23 Jun 2006
Last visit: 04 Jul 2012
Posts: 261
Own Kudos:
362
 [2]
Posts: 261
Kudos: 362
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
not that i'm being representative of either side...
i left a job that earned me more than atypical post phd tenure track business asst. prof. would earn, just to go through the arduous path of the phd. yes, for the love of it.
User avatar
GMAT TIGER
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Last visit: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 1,013
Own Kudos:
1,783
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Posts: 1,013
Kudos: 1,783
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMAT TIGER
maneeshkumar
Guys i would do a PHD more for love of it than for money.

Exactly. People in the US/west evaluate everything with money but in the east (basically in South Asia) the same is not the case. People in the east value the degree with knowledge and education.


Sorry guys for any misunderstanding and I appologize to you all if it was offensive.

being respectful to everybody, I further want to add that people everywhere are becoming more money oriented.

my intention was to say that if i do PHD, i do it for my love of and quest for high level of specilized knowledge and deeper understanding of subject matter.
avatar
perfectexamscore
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Last visit: 17 Jul 2008
Posts: 69
Own Kudos:
4
 [1]
Posts: 69
Kudos: 4
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i think a phd is business is overrated. better off to stick with the mba
avatar
tkkoh
Joined: 05 Oct 2005
Last visit: 23 Nov 2009
Posts: 412
Own Kudos:
23
 [2]
Posts: 412
Kudos: 23
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
perfectexamscore
i think a phd is business is overrated. better off to stick with the mba

overrated in what way? financial returns? knowledge attainment? prestige?

btw, if everyone stick with the mba, eventually there might not be any mba for anyone to stick to. In any case, just as an mba is not for everyone, neither is a phd.
avatar
eurospec
Joined: 14 May 2004
Last visit: 18 Mar 2010
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Location: Philippines
Posts: 4
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This shortage is true.. I've read the AACSB report, and other sites on the internet confirm this. A lot of business professors are retiring within the next 5 - 15 years.

Btw, the PhD is NOT overrated! Of course, it is not for everyone. But so is college - it's not for everyone, or the MBA.. It's just a matter of preference.
User avatar
anonymousegmat
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i know that AACSB requirements require a minimum amount of full time PhDs on staff, but... unfortunately, just because a professor retires does not mean he or she will be replaced by another professor; i think education has unfortunately adopted too much of a business model approach and professors get replaced with cheap part time adjuncts w/ no benefits whenever possible.
avatar
cabro57
Joined: 25 Apr 2005
Last visit: 14 Jun 2016
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
52
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 195
Kudos: 52
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anonymousegmat
i know that AACSB requirements require a minimum amount of full time PhDs on staff, but... unfortunately, just because a professor retires does not mean he or she will be replaced by another professor; i think education has unfortunately adopted too much of a business model approach and professors get replaced with cheap part time adjuncts w/ no benefits whenever possible.

I would contend that part of these "business dynamics" are due to the b-school deans at top schools being so fixated on MBA rankings. One way to get up in the rankings (it's been tried before, at least) it to reduce class size and increase selectivity. That way you don't need as many faculty members and you can afford to have some retirements without replacement.

I'd also add that as someone who was an adjunct faculty member before becoming a PhD student, I don't think we can implicitly generalize that the quality of b-school education has decreased along with the increased use of part time adjunct faculty and other practitioners. I know more about accounting for business combinations than any of my current professors (at a top 20 b-school) will ever want to know, and I taught at a 2nd tier Canadian school. And while it's also true that AACSB requirements require a minimum proportion of full-time tenure track PhDs, their rules are actually almost as extensive for evaluating the credentials of adjunct faculty; as an example, practitioners/professionals who teach one course per semester are viewed much more favorably than full-time lecturers and non-tenure track faculty members.
User avatar
anonymousegmat
Joined: 14 Jun 2007
Last visit: 14 Mar 2009
Posts: 300
Own Kudos:
29
 [1]
Posts: 300
Kudos: 29
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
cabro57
anonymousegmat
i know that AACSB requirements require a minimum amount of full time PhDs on staff, but... unfortunately, just because a professor retires does not mean he or she will be replaced by another professor; i think education has unfortunately adopted too much of a business model approach and professors get replaced with cheap part time adjuncts w/ no benefits whenever possible.

I would contend that part of these "business dynamics" are due to the b-school deans at top schools being so fixated on MBA rankings. One way to get up in the rankings (it's been tried before, at least) it to reduce class size and increase selectivity. That way you don't need as many faculty members and you can afford to have some retirements without replacement.

I'd also add that as someone who was an adjunct faculty member before becoming a PhD student, I don't think we can implicitly generalize that the quality of b-school education has decreased along with the increased use of part time adjunct faculty and other practitioners. I know more about accounting for business combinations than any of my current professors (at a top 20 b-school) will ever want to know, and I taught at a 2nd tier Canadian school. And while it's also true that AACSB requirements require a minimum proportion of full-time tenure track PhDs, their rules are actually almost as extensive for evaluating the credentials of adjunct faculty; as an example, practitioners/professionals who teach one course per semester are viewed much more favorably than full-time lecturers and non-tenure track faculty members.

I'm not dissing adjuncts at all. my comment on cheap/no benefits is coming from the point of view that I think it is unfair treatment and sort of creates second class citizen type treatment for them and not meant to be an evaluation of their quality. I've seen adjuncts teach 3 or 4 sections a semester at the same school... maybe the person wasn't a great researcher and thats why they never landed a tt job, but in my mind that person should just be given a contract position as a prof. its akin to the treatment illegal immigrants get.
 1   2   
Moderator:
PhD Forum Moderator
65 posts