GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 18 Jan 2020, 18:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 60480
Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2018, 03:19
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  15% (low)

Question Stats:

81% (01:54) correct 19% (02:12) wrong based on 314 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issued by the federal government allowing them to drill for deep-water oil off the Gulf of Mexico from royalty payments as an incentive to spur development in times of low oil and gas prices. These leases were supposed to have included a provision that reinstates the royalties should the market prices of oil and gas exceed a certain level. Because of an error by the federal government, however, the language that reinstates the royalties is missing from the more than 1,100 leases issued by the U.S. government in 1998 and 1999. Since the market price of oil and gas has recently risen far above the threshold levels, this error could allow the oil companies to reap a windfall of more than $10 billion through the life of the leases. In response, the government is pressuring the oil companies to renegotiate the leases. The executives of the oil companies strongly oppose renegotiation; all have issued statements stating that they expect the government to honor the terms of the contracts and that renegotiating a duly signed agreement would set a bad precedent.

Which of the following statements best reflects the position of the oil company executives?


A. Opportunity seldom knocks twice.

B. Do unto others as you would have done unto you.

C. One man`s loss is another man`s gain.

D. You don`t change the rules in the middle of the game.

E. Revenge is so sweet.

_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 27 Feb 2018
Posts: 35
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Jul 2018, 04:02
Bunuel wrote:
Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issued by the federal government allowing them to drill for deep-water oil off the Gulf of Mexico from royalty payments as an incentive to spur development in times of low oil and gas prices. These leases were supposed to have included a provision that reinstates the royalties should the market prices of oil and gas exceed a certain level. Because of an error by the federal government, however, the language that reinstates the royalties is missing from the more than 1,100 leases issued by the U.S. government in 1998 and 1999. Since the market price of oil and gas has recently risen far above the threshold levels, this error could allow the oil companies to reap a windfall of more than $10 billion through the life of the leases. In response, the government is pressuring the oil companies to renegotiate the leases. The executives of the oil companies strongly oppose renegotiation; all have issued statements stating that they expect the government to honor the terms of the contracts and that renegotiating a duly signed agreement would set a bad precedent.

Which of the following statements best reflects the position of the oil company executives?


A. Opportunity seldom knocks twice.

B. Do unto others as you would have done unto you.

C. One man`s loss is another man`s gain.

D. You don`t change the rules in the middle of the game.

E. Revenge is so sweet.


The Scenario here: Oil companies made a deal with government and pay a royalty to government when the Oil prices jump. But, the Clause mentioning the precedent is missing. And now the Government wants to change the signed leases.

A. There are no multiple opportunities here.

B. Oil company is not taking any revenge.

C. Comes close the government's loss is Oil companies gain. Since the Oil prices have recently risen, the Oil companies will reap profits in the near future.

D. Best explains the Oil company's position, since the game (leasing) was already signed and the rules of the game were agreed. You cant change it in the middle of the game.

E. Nobody is taking any revenge.
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2442
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jul 2018, 06:14
Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issued by the federal government allowing them to drill for deep-water oil off the Gulf of Mexico from royalty payments as an incentive to spur development in times of low oil and gas prices. These leases were supposed to have included a provision that reinstates the royalties should the market prices of oil and gas exceed a certain level. Because of an error by the federal government, however, the language that reinstates the royalties is missing from the more than 1,100 leases issued by the U.S. government in 1998 and 1999. Since the market price of oil and gas has recently risen far above the threshold levels, this error could allow the oil companies to reap a windfall of more than $10 billion through the life of the leases. In response, the government is pressuring the oil companies to renegotiate the leases. The executives of the oil companies strongly oppose renegotiation; all have issued statements stating that they expect the government to honor the terms of the contracts and that renegotiating a duly signed agreement would set a bad precedent.

Which of the following statements best reflects the position of the oil company executives?


A. Opportunity seldom knocks twice. - Incorrect

B. Do unto others as you would have done unto you. - Incorrect

C. One man`s loss is another man`s gain. - Incorrect - This is not the position of Oil execs

D. You don`t change the rules in the middle of the game. - Correct - The executives of the oil companies strongly oppose renegotiation; all have issued statements stating that they expect the government to honor the terms of the contracts and that renegotiating a duly signed agreement would set a bad precedent.

E. Revenge is so sweet.- Incorrect - there is no discussion about any revenge

Answer D

AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert , ccooley , GMATNinjaTwo ,
- In my opinion this question does not feel like GMAT like question
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 236
Re: Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jul 2018, 20:52
Skywalker18 wrote:
AjiteshArun , GMATNinja , mikemcgarry , egmat , RonPurewal , DmitryFarber , MagooshExpert , ccooley , GMATNinjaTwo ,
- In my opinion this question does not feel like GMAT like question

Hi Skywalker18,

You're right, this is definitely a very unusual question, and it would be pretty unlike the GMAT to have a question based around aphorisms like this. However, I've definitely seen questions that are somewhat similar (that ask about a general statement that someone in the passage might agree with), so the kind of thinking required for this question is still very GMAT-like :-)

Hope that helps! :-)
-Carolyn
_________________
Non-Human User
User avatar
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 7891
Re: Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2019, 05:23
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue   [#permalink] 16 Sep 2019, 05:23
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Since 1995, Congress has exempted oil companies that have leases issue

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne