It is currently 10 Dec 2017, 17:18

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the

Author Message
Director
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 900

Kudos [?]: 165 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 01:26
1
KUDOS
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

57% (01:19) correct 43% (01:36) wrong based on 9 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the most distinguished member of the faculty has resigned, fewer new courses have been developed, student has dropped, and the reputation of the department has gone down. These facts provide conclusive evidence that Professor Smythe was appointed to undermine the department.

The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument

(A) overlooks the fact that something can have the reputation for being of poor quality without being of poor quality
(B) bases a general claim on a few exceptional instances
(C) assumes that because an action was followed by a change, the action was undertaken to bring about that change
(D) fails to distinguish between a decline in quantity and a decline in quality
(E) presupposes what it purports to establish

Kudos [?]: 165 [1], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 915

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 03:11
C makes most sense here.

Kudos [?]: 59 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 01 Dec 2006
Posts: 55

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 05:59
agree with C

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 09 Nov 2006
Posts: 128

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 06:01
I vote for C

Kudos [?]: 4 [0], given: 0

Director
Affiliations: FRM Charter holder
Joined: 02 Dec 2006
Posts: 726

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 4

Schools: Stanford, Chicago Booth, Babson College

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 08:08
one more C.

Kudos [?]: 103 [0], given: 4

Director
Joined: 26 Feb 2006
Posts: 900

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 13:29
Why C?

Kudos [?]: 165 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 04 Oct 2006
Posts: 188

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 14:21
1
KUDOS
A) Says nothing about the Professors actual quality
B) Not really in scope and the instances don't really appear to be all that exceptional
D) This doesnt make sense

C is correct. If the question said "provide evidence that Professor Smythe has undermined the department," it would be better but still have some holes in the logic. As it is, the author is assuming that whoever was in charge of hiring the Professor had a desire to undermine the department and so hired someone who would. But the passage says nothing about the views of whoever hired him or the hiring at all. So it is assuming that the people who hired him wanted all of this to happen.
_________________

wall street...bulls, bears, people from connecticut

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Intern
Joined: 02 Jan 2007
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 5 [1], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 16:54
1
KUDOS
One more for C.

Maybe the best way to look at this problem is to link the claimed cause (hiring new dept head) and the effects (resigns, dropped in classes). The argument is flawed because it provides no evidence that the Smthye caused the negative effects. In other words, the argument simply makes the assumption that Smthye was hired to bring about those problems to the department.

Take a look at choice C again and make the association that hiring Smthye is the "action" and the negative effects were the "change". Then C will make sense.

Kudos [?]: 5 [1], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Aug 2005
Posts: 409

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

11 Jan 2007, 17:45
C.......

Best way to look at these types of question is to see whether there is a causalty in the conclusion...IF yes, then it may be faulty.

Kudos [?]: 81 [0], given: 0

VP
Status: There is always something new !!
Affiliations: PMI,QAI Global,eXampleCG
Joined: 08 May 2009
Posts: 1268

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 10

### Show Tags

10 May 2011, 02:03
C fits the bill perfectly.
_________________

Visit -- http://www.sustainable-sphere.com/
Promote Green Business,Sustainable Living and Green Earth !!

Kudos [?]: 290 [0], given: 10

Intern
Joined: 02 Oct 2010
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 5

Schools: Ross,Duke,Emory

### Show Tags

10 May 2011, 07:36
Should be C.

C paraphrases the situation so clearly....

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 5

Retired Moderator
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1626

Kudos [?]: 1137 [0], given: 109

Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs

### Show Tags

10 May 2011, 07:55
+1 C

It makes a wrong assumption about the possible causes.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1137 [0], given: 109

Director
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 620

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 51

### Show Tags

11 May 2011, 08:48
simple question, C is pretty obvious
_________________

What is of supreme importance in war is to attack the enemy's strategy.

Kudos [?]: 286 [0], given: 51

Re: CR: Professor Smythe   [#permalink] 11 May 2011, 08:48
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Since Professor Smythe has been head of the department, the

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.