Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
23 Jun 2023, 05:48
Kudos
Bookmarks
E
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
72% (01:50) correct
28%
(02:12)
wrong
based on 1350
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Since smoking-related illnesses are a serious health problem in Country X, and since addiction to nicotine prevents many people from quitting smoking, the government of Country X plans to reduce the maximum allowable quantity of nicotine per cigarette by half over the next five years. However, reducing the quantity of nicotine per cigarette will probably cause people addicted to nicotine to smoke more cigarettes. Therefore, implementing this plan is unlikely to reduce the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument about the consequences of implementing the Country X government's plan?
(A) Over half of the nonsmoking adults in Country X have smoked cigarettes in the past.
(B) If the Country X government's plan is implemented, the brands of cigarettes sold in Country X will differ less from each other than they do now in terms of their nicotine content.
(C) Inexpensive, smoke-free sources of nicotine, such as nicotine gum and nicotine skin patches, have recently become available in Country X.
(D) Many smokers in Country X already spend a large proportion of their disposable income on cigarettes.
(E) The main cause of smoking-related illnesses is not nicotine but the tar in cigarette smoke.
Screen Shot 2023-06-23 at 08.36.58.png [ 98.09 KiB | Viewed 8179 times ]
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument about the consequences of implementing the Country X government's plan?
(A) Over half of the nonsmoking adults in Country X have smoked cigarettes in the past.
(B) If the Country X government's plan is implemented, the brands of cigarettes sold in Country X will differ less from each other than they do now in terms of their nicotine content.
(C) Inexpensive, smoke-free sources of nicotine, such as nicotine gum and nicotine skin patches, have recently become available in Country X.
(D) Many smokers in Country X already spend a large proportion of their disposable income on cigarettes.
(E) The main cause of smoking-related illnesses is not nicotine but the tar in cigarette smoke.
Show SpoilerSource
Attachment:
Screen Shot 2023-06-23 at 08.36.58.png [ 98.09 KiB | Viewed 8179 times ]
Note: an older version of the question with a slightly different passage and answer choices can be found here.
01 Jul 2023, 05:50
Kudos
Bookmarks
Two strengthening scenarios possible with option E:
The best case scenario is that people smoke the same number of cigs as before, therefore reducing their nicotine intake whilst maintaining their tar intake, causing no change in the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
The worst case scenario is that people increase the number of cigs they smoke to meet their daily nicotine requirement, thus increasing their tar intake, ramping up the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
The best case scenario is that people smoke the same number of cigs as before, therefore reducing their nicotine intake whilst maintaining their tar intake, causing no change in the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
The worst case scenario is that people increase the number of cigs they smoke to meet their daily nicotine requirement, thus increasing their tar intake, ramping up the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
10 Oct 2024, 12:23
Kudos
Bookmarks
Conclusion:
The government’s plan to reduce the maximum allowable quantity of nicotine per cigarette will not help reduce the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
Premises:
1)Smoking-related illnesses are serious in the country.
2)Nicotine Addiction prevents people from quitting smoking;
3)The government’s plan might make people smoke more.
A.)People have smoked before. Out of scope;
B)The cigarettes brand will differ less respect to the nicotine content. Out of Scope.
C)Nicotine products are available now. Out of Scope.
D)Smokers spend lot of money on cigarettes. Out of scope.
E)The illness are mainly caused by the tar in cigarette smoke. —->If people start to smoke more, there will be more illness. STRGHTHEN.
The government’s plan to reduce the maximum allowable quantity of nicotine per cigarette will not help reduce the incidence of smoking-related illnesses.
Premises:
1)Smoking-related illnesses are serious in the country.
2)Nicotine Addiction prevents people from quitting smoking;
3)The government’s plan might make people smoke more.
A.)People have smoked before. Out of scope;
B)The cigarettes brand will differ less respect to the nicotine content. Out of Scope.
C)Nicotine products are available now. Out of Scope.
D)Smokers spend lot of money on cigarettes. Out of scope.
E)The illness are mainly caused by the tar in cigarette smoke. —->If people start to smoke more, there will be more illness. STRGHTHEN.
