Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 2807:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 28, 2026 - Oct. 16, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Sep 2911:00 AM EDT
-01:00 PM EDT
" Description: Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thur Sept. 29, 2026 - Dec. 3, 2026, 11:00am-1:00pm EST
Oct 0107:00 AM BST
-08:00 AM GMT
Welcome to the GMAT Club's Free Interview Prep Event for Top MBA Programs! Buy tickets - Virtual series that’s all set to equip you to -excel in your MBA interviews.
Oct 0301:00 PM EDT
-04:00 PM EDT
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Saturdays Oct. 3, 2026 - Dec. 26, 2026, 1:00pm-4:00pm EST
15 Dec 2019, 10:35
Kudos
Bookmarks
For: Last year, another company released software that incorporates some of the same user interface designs at issue in the dispute.
Against: Several key parts of the software code in Company S's product are nearly identical to code that Company M's former chief designer wrote for that company.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
58% (02:17) correct
42%
(02:24)
wrong
based on 1192
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Software Company M accused Company S of intellectual property theft, citing as evidence similar user interface designs for the company's new operating system products, both of which launched this year, and the fact that Company M's chief designer defected to Company S nine months ago. Company S countered that the product was 90% completed by the time the former chief designer joined Company S, and that the designer was not allowed to work on that product in order to avoid any potential conflicts of interest.
Select the additional information that, if true, would provide the strongest evidence For Company S's claim that it did not illegally obtain information about Company M's products, and select the additional information that, if true, would provide the strongest evidence Against that claim.
Select the additional information that, if true, would provide the strongest evidence For Company S's claim that it did not illegally obtain information about Company M's products, and select the additional information that, if true, would provide the strongest evidence Against that claim.
| For | Against | |
| A comparison with a third operating system company's user interface design shows overlap with Company M only in features that have been in industry-wide use for years. | ||
| Company S's former chief designer quit after a dispute over creative control. | ||
| Last year, another company released software that incorporates some of the same user interface designs at issue in the dispute. | ||
| Several key parts of the software code in Company S's product are nearly identical to code that Company M's former chief designer wrote for that company. | ||
| It is quite common for software companies to accuse other companies of intellectual property theft. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
For: Last year, another company released software that incorporates some of the same user interface designs at issue in the dispute.
Against: Several key parts of the software code in Company S's product are nearly identical to code that Company M's former chief designer wrote for that company.
15 Dec 2019, 11:05
Kudos
Bookmarks
For : If another company also has the same design as Company M's then that's probably not something related to the IP theft and the above argument strengthens S's claim
Against: If the key parts of S's code are identical to the key parts of M's, especially those designed by the chief designer than it's going against S's claim of not copying
Posted from my mobile device
Against: If the key parts of S's code are identical to the key parts of M's, especially those designed by the chief designer than it's going against S's claim of not copying
Posted from my mobile device
ricyan11
Joined: 28 May 2019
Last visit: 10 Jun 2020
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Location: Netherlands Antilles
Schools: Duke '22 (A$)
GMAT 1: 710 Q47 V41
15 Dec 2019, 11:24
Kudos
Bookmarks
For: Last year, another company released software that
incorporates some of the same user interface designs at
issue in the dispute.
Against: Several key parts of the software code in Company S's
product are nearly identical to code that Company M's
former chief designer wrote for that company.
incorporates some of the same user interface designs at
issue in the dispute.
Against: Several key parts of the software code in Company S's
product are nearly identical to code that Company M's
former chief designer wrote for that company.
