Which of the following, if true, most logically completes the argument?
Some dairy farmers in the province of Takandia want to give their cows a synthetic hormone that increases milk production. Many Takandians, however, do not want to buy milk from cows given the synthetic hormone. For this reason Takandia’s legislature is considering a measure requiring milk from cows given the hormone to be labeled as such. Even if the measure is defeated, dairy farmers who use the hormone will probably lose customers, since __________.
(A) it has not been proven that any trace of the synthetic hormone exists in the milk of cows given the hormone -
Not related to the argument. Argument is not concerned about whether any trace of hormone is visible in the milk(B) some farmers in Takandia who plan to use the synthetic hormone will probably not do so if the measure were passed -
this is not the reason of dairy farmers who use hormones losing the customers(C) milk from cows that have not been given the synthetic hormone can be labeled as such without any legislative action -
CORRECT if this milk is labelled and the milk with synthetic hormone can't be labelled, the farmers would start losing customers(D) the legislature’s consideration of the bill has been widely publicized -
We need a reason why the farmers using synthetic hormone would lose the customers(E) milk that comes from cows given the synthetic hormone looks and tastes the same as milk from cows that have not received the hormone -
if the milk tastes the same, how will the farmers using synthetic hormones lose the customers?