Last visit was: 09 Jul 2025, 00:11 It is currently 09 Jul 2025, 00:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
kidchaos
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 Jul 2010
Last visit: 08 Nov 2017
Posts: 311
Own Kudos:
317
 [67]
Given Kudos: 24
Affiliations: Volunteer Operation Smile India, Creative Head of College IEEE branch (2009-10), Chief Editor College Magazine (2009), Finance Head College Magazine (2008)
Location: India
WE2: Entrepreneur (E-commerce - The Laptop Skin Vault)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
WE:Marketing (Other)
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
59
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,212
 [61]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,212
 [61]
51
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
74,212
 [6]
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,212
 [6]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
saikrishna2589
Joined: 19 Sep 2010
Last visit: 20 Oct 2011
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
here we are askd to weaken the argument.
The author states that the legislators were mistaken as they are against the art which depict nudity.but it could be that many others artists find this as an excuse and depict nudity in their art too which must be unnecessary.so the legislators were against these artists.but Michelangelo's works of art,being an exception bcoz of the high artistic value.

so i wud go with E
User avatar
hemanthp
Joined: 31 Jul 2010
Last visit: 19 Jul 2016
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
1,331
 [1]
Given Kudos: 104
Status:Keep fighting!
Affiliations: IIT Madras
 Q49  V34 GMAT 2: 720  Q50  V37
WE 1: 2+ years - Programming
WE 2: 3+ years - Product developement,
WE 3: 2+ years - Program management
Posts: 150
Kudos: 1,331
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
tough one. I went with D but the arguments for E make sense. but D does weaken to an extent. If legislators have a different view than citizens (including the guy making this statement), then the legislators might believe that michaelangelo's work is not obscene but the new photographer's is then the author's statement "These legislators are mistaken, however, since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene" falls apart as the legislators are not mistaken but made a purposeful decision.
User avatar
arundas
Joined: 25 Jul 2010
Last visit: 21 Aug 2012
Posts: 99
Own Kudos:
101
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Status:ISB, Hyderabad
Concentration: Strategy
 Q50  V35 GMAT 2: 740  Q50  V40
WE 1: 4 years Software Product Development
WE 2: 3 years ERP Consulting
Posts: 99
Kudos: 101
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E for me. This is because Author's conclusion is that nudity is not obscene as MichaelAngelo's work contained nudity but was not considered obscene. So to weaken the argument all we need to do is state that MichaelAngelo's work is Nudity which is exactly done by E.
avatar
sap
Joined: 22 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2012
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
8
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 19
Kudos: 8
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
@VeritasPrepKarishma :
Option (E) tells you that Michelangelo's work has high artistic value. That is why it is not considered obscene in spite of having nudity. This weakens the argument since Michelangelo's work has something extra and the same may not be applicable to modern photography.

Even here we are assuming that work of contemporary artist is not as good as it is of Michelangelo. It may be that contemporart artists are as good as or even better, and therefore there work would be artistic as well

However from the sentence
"since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene"

we get that Michelangelo was more artistic, and therefore A should suit more !!.
avatar
Thabk
Joined: 14 Aug 2010
Last visit: 26 Mar 2012
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Posts: 10
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kidchaos
Some of our federal legislators are opposed to government endowments or other financial support for photography as an art form on the basis that much of modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene. These legislators are mistaken, however, since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) The artistic level of the works of the vast majority of modern photographers does not approach that of Michelangelo's works.

(B) Many modern photographic works of art have been displayed in museums alongside Michelangelo's works.

(C) The majority of Michelangelo's work was not funded or otherwise supported by the government.

(D) What these legislators consider to be obscene does not coincide with what the general citizenry views as obscene.

(E) Due to their relatively high artistic value, works of Michelangelo that portray nudity are not considered obscene.


Premise 1 :Some of our federal legislators are opposed to government endowments or other financial support for photography as an art form on the basis that much of modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene.

Conclusion : These legislators are mistaken

Premise 2 : since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene.

(A) The artistic level of the works of the vast majority of modern photographers does not approach that of Michelangelo's works.
Irrelevant. This information doesn't affect the premise or the conclusion.

(B) Many modern photographic works of art have been displayed in museums alongside Michelangelo's works.
so what ?, no impact

(C) The majority of Michelangelo's work was not funded or otherwise supported by the government.
The discussion is about the legislators and not the funding by the government. Misleading...

(D) What these legislators consider to be obscene does not coincide with what the general citizenry views as obscene.
Comparing legislators viewpoint and general citizens viewpoint doesn't impact the conclusion.

(E) Due to their relatively high artistic value, works of Michelangelo that portray nudity are not considered obscene.[/quote]
This gives a explanation why Premise 2 cannot be used logically to conclude and oppose premise 1. This is the winner !!!
User avatar
gmatter0913
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Last visit: 02 Oct 2014
Posts: 219
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 86
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 219
Kudos: 1,279
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
FLs think "modern photography's nudity" is obscene. The argument says - this thought is flawed because "Michelangelo's nudity" was not considered obscene.

So, basically the comparison is between these two works of nudity. To weaken the argument, all you have to do is to show that they both are different forms of nudity.

Option E does just that...
avatar
sheolokesh
Joined: 04 Jan 2014
Last visit: 06 Jun 2015
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 20
Posts: 52
Kudos: 56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Which one is an argument here? federal legislators's argument stating that modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene? or Author's argument stating that federal legislators are mistaken?

If we have to weaken the federal legislators's argument, E is the answer.
If we have to weaken the author's argument, A seems to fit here..

In these kind of questions, where the question stem dint have info of which part to weaken, which part must be taken as argument? Please help..
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 16,101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 475
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,101
Kudos: 74,212
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sheolokesh
Which one is an argument here? federal legislators's argument stating that modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene? or Author's argument stating that federal legislators are mistaken?

If we have to weaken the federal legislators's argument, E is the answer.
If we have to weaken the author's argument, A seems to fit here..

In these kind of questions, where the question stem dint have info of which part to weaken, which part must be taken as argument? Please help..

"The argument" is always the author's argument. The question is what is the author's argument?

It is this:
Premises:
- Some of our federal legislators believe that much of modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene.
- Even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene.
Conclusion:
These federal legislators should not consider modern photography obscene. (He says they are mistaken so basically he is saying that they should not consider it obscene.)

We always weaken the conclusion. So we have to weaken "These federal legislators should not consider modern photography obscene."
We do that by giving additional information - Michelangelo's works have high artistic value.

Check this: some-of-our-federal-legislators-are-opposed-to-government-100711.html#p820294
avatar
manisha85
Joined: 29 Jan 2014
Last visit: 17 Dec 2015
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion= The legislators are mistaken as ....... provides us with an example of Michelangelo's work(which depict nudity), but were not considered obscene ..
Our Job is to find out an evidence that gives us some information about modern photography that does not emphasize the same value as those of Michelangelo's works....
Hence, the only option that suits are prethinking is option E
User avatar
anonimo
Joined: 06 Apr 2012
Last visit: 24 May 2016
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 20
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hemanthp
tough one. I went with D but the arguments for E make sense. but D does weaken to an extent. If legislators have a different view than citizens (including the guy making this statement), then the legislators might believe that michaelangelo's work is not obscene but the new photographer's is then the author's statement "These legislators are mistaken, however, since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene" falls apart as the legislators are not mistaken but made a purposeful decision.
I think the problem here is that D is starting a piece of new information, and that would be the citizens. No where in the stimulus says that legislator's resolution has anything to do with citizens. BE CAREFUL WITH NEW INFORMATION.
User avatar
abrakadabra21
Joined: 07 Sep 2014
Last visit: 10 Nov 2017
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 342
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 256
Kudos: 209
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Some of our federal legislators are opposed to government endowments or other financial support for photography as an art form on the basis that much of modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene. These legislators are mistaken, however, since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene.

Nudity => obscene

if we establish that there is a distinction between Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity & modern photography which also portrays nudity then we can prove legislators right.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) The artistic level of the works of the vast majority of modern photographers does not approach that of Michelangelo's works.

(C) The majority of Michelangelo's work was not funded or otherwise supported by the government. even then Nudity => obscene doesn't break this line of thought.


(E) Due to their relatively high artistic value, works of Michelangelo that portray nudity are not considered obscene.

Between A &E => A is wrong because of ambiguous connection between The artistic level of the works of the vast majority of modern photographers & Michelangelo's works. so what? does that mean artistic level is justified for nudity and therefore obscenity. E makes this clear.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 9 July 2025
Posts: 102,597
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 97,452
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 102,597
Kudos: 739,647
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kidchaos
Some of our federal legislators are opposed to government endowments or other financial support for photography as an art form on the basis that much of modern photography portrays nudity and is thus obscene. These legislators are mistaken, however, since even they would agree that Michelangelo's works of art, most of which depict nudity, are not obscene.

Which of the following statements, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) The artistic level of the works of the vast majority of modern photographers does not approach that of Michelangelo's works.

(B) Many modern photographic works of art have been displayed in museums alongside Michelangelo's works.

(C) The majority of Michelangelo's work was not funded or otherwise supported by the government.

(D) What these legislators consider to be obscene does not coincide with what the general citizenry views as obscene.

(E) Due to their relatively high artistic value, works of Michelangelo that portray nudity are not considered obscene.

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION



The correct answer is (E).

The argument relies on the assumption that Michelangelo’s portrayals of nudity are similar to modern photographic portrayals of nudity in all respects relevant to the argument. Choice (E) directly refutes this assumption by stating explicitly that Michelangelo’s works are considered not obscene for the reason that they have relatively high artistic value.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,439
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,439
Kudos: 952
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7349 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts