Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:36 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:36
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
jimmyjamesdonkey
Joined: 01 May 2007
Last visit: 27 Mar 2009
Posts: 484
Own Kudos:
1,539
 [23]
Posts: 484
Kudos: 1,539
 [23]
Kudos
Add Kudos
23
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
7,460
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sondenso
Joined: 04 May 2006
Last visit: 04 Dec 2018
Posts: 858
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:CBS, Kellogg
Posts: 858
Kudos: 7,460
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rpmodi
Joined: 19 Apr 2008
Last visit: 05 Apr 2009
Posts: 171
Own Kudos:
388
 [2]
Posts: 171
Kudos: 388
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There is no information about increase/decrease of part time students in either statement so my pick is E , let me know what is OA.

if you pick numbers lets say in 99

FullTime=700
partTime=300

in 2000

FullTime=750
partTime=300 (stays the same since 5% increase is all counted in Full Time students )

scenario 2

in 99
FullTime =1300
PartTime=700
in 2000
FullTime=1350
Partime=750

% increase of fulltime students gives different answer for both the scenarios and hence my answer is E
User avatar
DeeptiM
Joined: 16 Feb 2011
Last visit: 01 Mar 2012
Posts: 141
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 141
Kudos: 1,247
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Some of the students enrolled at college T are part-time students and the rest are full-time. By what percent did the number of full-time students enrolled at college T increase from fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000?

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

Image:
Attachment:
GPrep_Full_time_students.jpg
GPrep_Full_time_students.jpg [ 70.77 KiB | Viewed 25445 times ]
User avatar
soul123
Joined: 03 Mar 2010
Last visit: 20 Oct 2011
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
11
 [3]
Given Kudos: 59
Posts: 15
Kudos: 11
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vinayaerostar
Answer E

Answer should be E, and if you want to find the% increase of some thing then in that case we need to have to 2 data available.
1. Change( which is thr in 1 part)
2. original value or the value of fall 1999

so only one information is available so answer is E.

hope it helps
User avatar
fluke
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 20 Dec 2010
Last visit: 24 Oct 2013
Posts: 1,099
Own Kudos:
5,094
 [4]
Given Kudos: 376
Posts: 1,099
Kudos: 5,094
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
DeeptiM
Some of the students enrolled at college T are part-time students and the rest are full-time. By what percent did the number of full-time students enrolled at college T increase from fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000?

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

CASE 1:
Total StudentsFull-time studentsPart-time Students
Fall 19991001090
Fall 20001056045
% Change5% increase50 more students, a 500% increaseNot Required

CASE 2:
Total StudentsFull-time studentsPart-time Students
Fall 19991002575
Fall 20001057530
% Change5% increase50 more students, a 200% increaseNot Required

Not Sufficient.

Ans: "E"
User avatar
ajaym28
Joined: 14 Apr 2014
Last visit: 13 Mar 2016
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 52
Kudos: 687
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jimmyjamesdonkey
Some of the students enrolled at college T are part-time students and the rest are full-time. By what percent did the number of full-time students enrolled at college T increase from fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000?

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

(1)

insufficient

(2)
no differentiation between part-time and full-time students
insufficient

(together)
we still don't know anything about the # of part-time students, which is an essential contributor to the 5% increase mentioned in statement (2)
examples:
- if there are 0 part-time students in both years, then the # of full-time students has increased by 5%
- if the # of full-time students has increased from 0 to 50 but the # of part-time students has remained constant at 1000 (so that 50 is 5 percent of the enrollment), then the # of full-time students has grown by infinity%
...and anything in between

answer = E
avatar
geek_mnnit
Joined: 06 May 2016
Last visit: 22 May 2017
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
Posts: 26
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VeritasPrepKarishma, Bunuel, chetan2u
I did understood the solution and agree that answer should be E, but I also fall into trap of choosing B in the first go.
Could you please explain how to answer this question algebraically without taking numbers?
I am just not able to understand whats wrong with the approach of taking initial values to be X+Y and final values 1.05(X+Y)!
avatar
geek_mnnit
Joined: 06 May 2016
Last visit: 22 May 2017
Posts: 26
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 110
Posts: 26
Kudos: 12
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Moderators,
any update on this one?
User avatar
anairamitch1804
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Last visit: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 506
Own Kudos:
3,564
 [2]
Given Kudos: 877
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE:Education (Education)
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
Posts: 506
Kudos: 3,564
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(1)
no indication of the size of the student body
insufficient

(2)
no differentiation between part-time and full-time students
insufficient

(together)
we still don't know anything about the # of part-time students, which is an essential contributor to the 5% increase mentioned in statement (2)
examples:
- if there are 0 part-time students in both years, then the # of full-time students has increased by 5%
- if the # of full-time students has increased from 0 to 50 but the # of part-time students has remained constant at 1000 (so that 50 is 5 percent of the enrollment), then the # of full-time students has grown by infinity%
...and anything in between

answer = e
avatar
elainetianfong
Joined: 14 Nov 2012
Last visit: 12 Sep 2018
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 263
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Products:
GMAT 1: 740 Q51 V38
Posts: 16
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sn: the new number of full time students.
So : the old number of full time students

The question is asking for Z as
Z = ( Sn - So) / So

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.

=> Sn - So = 50
We dont know So value so we cannot calculate Z.
Insuff.

2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

=> We have no clue whether an increase in the number of total student corellates with a rise in the number of full time students or not.
Insuff.
So E is the answer.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
1,343
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,343
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Some of the students enrolled at college T are part-time students and the rest are full-time. By what percent did the number of full-time students enrolled at college T increase from fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000?

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

bumping gmatbusters niks18 amanvermagmat Bunuel VeritasPrepKarishma
for validating the approach/ suggesting an efficient one.

Step 1: simplify the questions stem to simplest form, I used algebraic approach to form linear equations.

Step 2: write algebraic form of equations for both the statements. As seen here, the main question asks for ratio of
difference of absolute values in numerator to the absolute value in denominator.
St 1 gives the difference, but the absolute value of denominator is not known.
St 2 seems to be providing no info in the context of what the question is asking.

Combining the statements, I still do not see arriving at an unique value for denominator, Hence (E)

Edit: Reply edited.

Attachments

Q1.jpeg
Q1.jpeg [ 32.98 KiB | Viewed 18139 times ]

User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
6,646
 [1]
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,646
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
Since we do not know the number of full time students, this 50 can be very small or very large.
-if in 1999, there was only 1 full time student, and in 2000 number increased by 50, then no. of students = 51
% increase = \(\frac{50}{1}\)*100 = 5000%
-if in 1999, there were 1000 full time student, and in 2000 number increased by 50, then no. of students = 1050
% increase = \(\frac{50}{1000}\)*100 = 5%
Hence insufficient.

(PS: you need not do the above calculation. Remember since we do not know the base value, increase in value will never be sufficient to find the percentage increase.)

2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.
It is similar to St 1: since we don't know the initial total number of students, we can not find the number of total number/full time students.
hence insufficient.

Even after combining St 1 & 2, we are unable to find the number of full time students which is required to find the % increase in full time students. Hence NOT SUFFICIENT.

Check your understanding :
if we change the second statement as:

New Statement2):The number of full time students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.
Now find the number of Part time time students in 2000.



adkikani
Quote:
Some of the students enrolled at college T are part-time students and the rest are full-time. By what percent did the number of full-time students enrolled at college T increase from fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000?

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

bumping gmatbusters niks18 amanvermagmat Bunuel VeritasPrepKarishma
for validating the approach/ suggesting an efficient one.
User avatar
GMATBusters
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,924
Own Kudos:
6,646
 [1]
Given Kudos: 241
WE:General Management (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,924
Kudos: 6,646
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi adkikani

Your equation for second statement is flawed, you forgot to put a bracket required to provide the effect of factor of 1.05.
See sketch.
Attachment:
Q1.jpeg
Q1.jpeg [ 69.05 KiB | Viewed 18037 times ]

now , even if you get correct equations, if you are not able to conclude further, it is not of much use.
In my opinion, this is not the best approach.

adkikani
Quote:
Some of the students enrolled at college T are part-time students and the rest are full-time. By what percent did the number of full-time students enrolled at college T increase from fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000?

1) There were 50 more full-time students enrolled at college T in the fall of 2000 than in the fall of 1999.
2) The total number of students enrolled at college T increased by 5 percent from the fall of 1999 to the fall of 2000.

bumping gmatbusters niks18 amanvermagmat Bunuel VeritasPrepKarishma
for validating the approach/ suggesting an efficient one.
User avatar
adkikani
User avatar
IIM School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Last visit: 24 Dec 2023
Posts: 1,236
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,207
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Other)
Posts: 1,236
Kudos: 1,343
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nice catch gmatbusters :thumbup:

Quote:
now , even if you get correct equations, if you are not able to conclude further, it is not of much use.

I have edited the steps in my original post to clear the fog. ;)
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,588
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,588
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts