Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 10:02 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 10:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
rampuria
Joined: 04 Sep 2008
Last visit: 06 May 2019
Posts: 149
Own Kudos:
310
 [15]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: Kolkata
Concentration: Strategic Management
Schools:La Martiniere for Boys
Posts: 149
Kudos: 310
 [15]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Technext
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Last visit: 14 Oct 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
386
 [1]
Concentration: International Business
Posts: 66
Kudos: 386
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
sanjay_gmat
Joined: 06 Jul 2007
Last visit: 05 Apr 2009
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
91
 [2]
Posts: 119
Kudos: 91
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Technext
Joined: 10 Jan 2009
Last visit: 14 Oct 2022
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
Concentration: International Business
Posts: 66
Kudos: 386
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sanjay_gmat
Technext, you might be right, but what I gather from this passage is that the author is comparing the present situation with the almost spam free world that used to exist in the past. This comparison is vital for the argument, as without knowing how things were before, how would you decide that it's time to pull the plug on spammers.. So, I choose A.
Hi sanjay_gmat,


IMO, argument here is the first statement of the passage. If I’m correct then the comparison should not be vital to reach the conclusion (argument). I feel that we can reach the conclusion without its (first boldface) help too.

Let others share their thought on this.


Regards,
Technext
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,145
Own Kudos:
10,988
 [3]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,145
Kudos: 10,988
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm curious about the source of the question; while I could find the question in a few threads with a web search, none mentioned where the question was from.

The argument does not depend on the first bold-faced sentence, which rules out A. Still, the second bold-faced sentence is a conclusion, not an inference. An inference is a specific type of conclusion - it's a conclusion that can be deduced from facts, requiring no additional assumptions. An inference is not a viewpoint or a policy proposal. As we all know from GMAT CR questions, conclusions can be weakened or strengthened, and they can be flawed or they can be valid. An inference is always true, as long as the facts are true.

From the evidence presented, you might conclude that regulating junk email would be a good idea. Still, that's a point of view; it's not something you can logically deduce from the facts. It's only a logically valid inference if you make many assumptions not presented in the stem (junk email must be cut down, government regulation will be effective, there is no other alternative way the goal of reducing junk email could be achieved). It's a conclusion, not an inference.
User avatar
ngoctraiden1905
Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Last visit: 18 Nov 2009
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 78
Kudos: 102
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I dont think it's a garbage
One more evidence to choose B rather than A is that "relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising" is only a suggestion, so can be considered inference, not a conclusion.
User avatar
cledgard
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 160
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 71
Status:GMAT Coach
Location: Peru
GPA: 3.98
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 160
Kudos: 356
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ngoctraiden1905
I dont think it's a garbage
One more evidence to choose B rather than A is that "relevant anti-spam regulations should be framed to stop unsolicited advertising" is only a suggestion, so can be considered inference, not a conclusion.


It seems that you are not clear about the difference between an inference and a conclusion. I may arrive a conclusion, but this conclusion does not have to be true; however, an inference must be true according to the facts in the stimulus. In This case the conclusion is the opinion of the author. You may disagree with the conclusion, but it still is his conclusion. You cannot infer (deduce logically) that regulation is needed.

See previous post by IanStewart.
avatar
Jaya6
Joined: 09 Jan 2021
Last visit: 21 Jun 2022
Posts: 68
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 142
Location: India
Schools: ISB '23 (S)
GPA: 3.2
Schools: ISB '23 (S)
Posts: 68
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone detail the difference between option B and E?
User avatar
yuxiawu
Joined: 06 May 2023
Last visit: 20 Oct 2023
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 3
Location: China
GMAT 1: 580 Q23 V47
GMAT 1: 580 Q23 V47
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I go for E because I think the first BF is pre-evidence.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts