GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

 It is currently 24 May 2018, 16:41

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Souce: Another GMAT Forum During the 1980s the homicide rate

Author Message
Manager
Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 133
Souce: Another GMAT Forum During the 1980s the homicide rate [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 15:05
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 2 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Souce: Another GMAT Forum

During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 percent. The weapon used usually was a knife. Potentially lethal knives are sold openly and legally in many shops. Most homicide deaths occur as a result of unpremeditated assaults within the family. Even if these are increasing, they would probably not result in deaths if it were not for the prevalence of such knives. Thus the blame lies with the permissiveness of the government that allows such lethal weapons to be sold.

Which one of the following is the strongest criticism of the argument above?

(A) There are other means besides knives, such as guns or poison, that can be used to accomplish homicide by a person who intends to cause the death of another.
(B) It is impossible to know how many unpremeditated assaults occur within the family, since many are not reported to the authorities.
(C) Knives are used in other homicides besides those that result from unpremeditated assaults within the family.
(D) The argument assumes without justification that the knives used to commit homicide are generally purchased as part of a deliberate plan to commit murder or to inflict grievous harm on a family member.
(E) If the potentially lethal knives referred to are ordinary household knives, such knives were common before the rise in the homicide rate; but if they are weaponry, such knives are not generally available in households.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.
Current Student
Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 224
Re: CR- During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 15:19
humtum0 wrote:
Souce: Another GMAT Forum

During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 percent. The weapon used usually was a knife. Potentially lethal knives are sold openly and legally in many shops. Most homicide deaths occur as a result of unpremeditated assaults within the family. Even if these are increasing, they would probably not result in deaths if it were not for the prevalence of such knives. Thus the blame lies with the permissiveness of the government that allows such lethal weapons to be sold.

Which one of the following is the strongest criticism of the argument above?

(A) There are other means besides knives, such as guns or poison, that can be used to accomplish homicide by a person who intends to cause the death of another.
(B) It is impossible to know how many unpremeditated assaults occur within the family, since many are not reported to the authorities.
(C) Knives are used in other homicides besides those that result from unpremeditated assaults within the family.
(D) The argument assumes without justification that the knives used to commit homicide are generally purchased as part of a deliberate plan to commit murder or to inflict grievous harm on a family member.
(E) If the potentially lethal knives referred to are ordinary household knives, such knives were common before the rise in the homicide rate; but if they are weaponry, such knives are not generally available in households.

if you have a particular answer choice you're not sure about - post and I'll explain why~
Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 58
Location: Houston TX
Re: CR- During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 16:05
JasonC,
How about D? I'm debating between D and E.
_________________

haveaniceday

Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jul 2008
Posts: 271
Re: CR- During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 18:23
I think E :

AB and C are not at all strong

D might be a choice but E is more stronger in that it clearly attacks the conclusion that government lenient policies
should be blamed :

1 because the lethal knife is used for other purposes in the house
2 if a knife which even if made with the intention for physical assault is not available in house hold.
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Apr 2008
Posts: 394
Re: CR- During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Aug 2008, 22:01
humtum0 wrote:
Souce: Another GMAT Forum

During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 percent. The weapon used usually was a knife. Potentially lethal knives are sold openly and legally in many shops. Most homicide deaths occur as a result of unpremeditated assaults within the family. Even if these are increasing, they would probably not result in deaths if it were not for the prevalence of such knives. Thus the blame lies with the permissiveness of the government that allows such lethal weapons to be sold.

Which one of the following is the strongest criticism of the argument above?

(A) There are other means besides knives, such as guns or poison, that can be used to accomplish homicide by a person who intends to cause the death of another.
(B) It is impossible to know how many unpremeditated assaults occur within the family, since many are not reported to the authorities.
(C) Knives are used in other homicides besides those that result from unpremeditated assaults within the family.
(D) The argument assumes without justification that the knives used to commit homicide are generally purchased as part of a deliberate plan to commit murder or to inflict grievous harm on a family member.
(E) If the potentially lethal knives referred to are ordinary household knives, such knives were common before the rise in the homicide rate; but if they are weaponry, such knives are not generally available in households.

IMO E)

D) also weakens the argument's assumption but E) is much more stronger in depicting that weapon knives does not exist in households and household knives were always there even before rise in homicide rate.
VP
Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1295
Re: CR- During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Aug 2008, 00:47
humtum0 wrote:
Souce: Another GMAT Forum

During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50 percent. The weapon used usually was a knife. Potentially lethal knives are sold openly and legally in many shops. Most homicide deaths occur as a result of unpremeditated assaults within the family. Even if these are increasing, they would probably not result in deaths if it were not for the prevalence of such knives. Thus the blame lies with the permissiveness of the government that allows such lethal weapons to be sold.

Which one of the following is the strongest criticism of the argument above?

(A) There are other means besides knives, such as guns or poison, that can be used to accomplish homicide by a person who intends to cause the death of another.-> here this is not correct since in the 50% increased cases knives have been used.we concerned about that only
(B) It is impossible to know how many unpremeditated assaults occur within the family, since many are not reported to the authorities. -> this is OOS
(C) Knives are used in other homicides besides those that result from unpremeditated assaults within the family. -> OOS since we a\concerned about unpremeditated assaults within the family.
(D) The argument assumes without justification that the knives used to commit homicide are generally purchased as part of a deliberate plan to commit murder or to inflict grievous harm on a family member. -> irrelevant
(E) If the potentially lethal knives referred to are ordinary household knives, such knives were common before the rise in the homicide rate; but if they are weaponry, such knives are not generally available in households. -> this rightly critises the argument blaming knives being permitted by govt.These knives were sold before also and are just like any knives hence if house hold people use these govt cannot stop selling knives but must take some other approach to prevent killers from murdering.

--== Message from GMAT Club Team ==--

This is not a quality discussion. It has been retired.

If you would like to discuss this question please re-post it in the respective forum. Thank you!

To review the GMAT Club's Forums Posting Guidelines, please follow these links: Quantitative | Verbal Please note - we may remove posts that do not follow our posting guidelines. Thank you.

_________________

cheers
Its Now Or Never

Re: CR- During the 1980s the homicide rate in Britain rose by 50   [#permalink] 11 Aug 2008, 00:47
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# Souce: Another GMAT Forum During the 1980s the homicide rate

Moderators: GMATNinja, GMATNinjaTwo

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.