Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 13:22 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 13:22
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
CM12
Joined: 11 May 2021
Last visit: 07 Apr 2024
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 124
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V42 (Online)
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V42 (Online)
Posts: 15
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,310
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SohiniSengupta
Joined: 14 Oct 2022
Last visit: 02 Jul 2025
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
Schools: Fuqua '27
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q84 V83 DI81
GPA: 9.34
Schools: Fuqua '27
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q84 V83 DI81
Posts: 51
Kudos: 17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
49,310
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,310
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized and flows logically from one point to the next. The writer presents two premises and discusses their potential weaknesses in a clear and concise manner. The only minor issue is that the connection between the first premise and the conclusion could be made clearer.

Word structure: 6/6
The writer uses appropriate vocabulary and sentence structure throughout the essay. The language is clear, concise, and effective in communicating the writer's ideas.

Paragraph structure and formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-structured with clear introduction, body, and conclusion paragraphs. The body paragraph presents the two premises and discusses their potential weaknesses. The only minor issue is that the conclusion could be a bit stronger and provide more definitive recommendations.

Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay is written in correct English with no major grammatical errors or awkward phrasing.

Vocabulary and word expression: 6/6
The writer uses appropriate and varied vocabulary throughout the essay. The language is clear, concise, and effective in communicating the writer's ideas.

SohiniSengupta
Sajjad1994, could you please rate my essay -
Thanks in advance.

Question -

“Studies suggest that an average coffee drinker’s consumption of coffee increases with age, from age 10 through age 60. Even after age 60, coffee consumption remains high. The average cola drinker’s consumption of cola, however, declines with increasing age. Both of these trends have remained stable for the past 40 years. Given that the number of older adults will significantly increase as the population ages over the next 20 years, it follows that the demand for coffee will increase and the demand for cola will decrease during this period. We should, therefore, consider transferring our investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee.”

Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counter examples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.

My Response -

In this argument, the author has considered 2 premises to derive to a conclusion that one should consider transferring investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee. The premises are talking about past 40 years trend of cola and coffee consumers and an assumption that after 20 years the number of older adults will increase, hence demand for coffee will also increase. For a couple of reasons the argument is not very convincing.

First, the author compares 2 unrelated trends with each other - the consumption of coffee increases with age and after 60 the consumption stays high and the consumption of cola tends to decrease with age. There is a gap in this assumption - he didn't consider what is the initial base of these trends. It can be possible that the base of young cola drinkers is significantly high and the decrease rate is pretty low with age in comparison with the base of coffee users at young age is pretty small and the increase rate is moderate. If this scenario is true then it might be possible that at older age there is not much difference in numbers of coffee consumers and cola consumers.

Second, the author falsely assumed that after 20 years only the number of older adults will increase. There is a fair possibility that the number of young adults and teenagers will also increase (might be the country in consideration doesn't have strict population control policies). In that case the number of young cola users may also increase in next 20 years. Hence this assumption is not accurate.

In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion many more facts and evidences need to be considered before making the decision of transferring investments. A thorough population trend study is important and also the number of current consumers of each of the drink at every age bucket is essential to consider.
User avatar
shoemugger
Joined: 18 Nov 2022
Last visit: 06 Jun 2024
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please can someone review my attempt at the prompt:

The prompt claims that while coffee's consumed by adults increases with age from 10-60, the inverse is true for cola consumption. Further, it notes that given an increasing aging population, there should be a transfer in investment allocation from Cola Loca into Early Bird Coffee. This is a slippery slope as the argument relies heavily on loose claims brought forth by surveys and assumes, potentially incorrectly, current trends in the market. Further, we know nothing more about the invested companies other than their names and as such should have a better understanding of their business model before transferring any investments. Due to these reasons, the argument is uncompelling and should be explored further.

Firstly the argument relies heavily on studies, but, only details a quick summation of these studies while leaving significant questions unanswered. For example, did the studies take into account the population as a whole or only certain more health minded subsections? Such information is vital if we are to understand potential skews in the data which may under or over represent the consumption of any individual beverage. It would be helpful if the author detailed the premise of the studies, how they were conducted, and quantitative outcomes of these studies.

Secondly, the argument is potentially harming itself by proving a long time horizon on trends in the market. There may be an up shift in Cola consumption in the last 2-5 years that is missed because of downward trajectory of the 40 year trend line. This information is critical if we are to understand future trends in the market surrounding these beverages. The author should showcase a shorter time span to better understand current consumption frequencies.

Finally, the author makes the unwise decision to recommend transferring investments into Early Bird Coffee from Cola Loca. Other than the names of the companies, we know nothing about their business model or their financial strength. Cola Loca could be a multinational conglomerate that could have stronger holdings in coffee industry than Early Bird Coffee! It would be unwise to make any investment decision before understanding such fundamentals of the companies mentioned. The argument would be strengthened if it provided greater detail about each company.

To conclude the prompt fails to convince the audience as it does not take into account critical points that would strengthen the argument. A better understanding of the studies, current trends, and the companies highlighted would serve to bolster the argument.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,310
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6

Coherence and connectivity: 5/6
The essay maintains a clear line of reasoning throughout and connects ideas in a logical sequence. The essay effectively uses transitional words and phrases to link different ideas and maintain coherence. However, some sentences could be better connected to each other to improve the overall flow of the essay.

Word structure: 6/6
The essay uses a variety of sentence structures, and words are used appropriately to convey the intended meaning. The essay also demonstrates good command of vocabulary, with no significant errors or awkward phrasing.

Paragraph structure and formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized, with clear topic sentences and well-developed paragraphs that support the main argument. However, some paragraphs could be more concise and focused, and a clearer separation of ideas between paragraphs could be made.

Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay is written in a clear and concise language, and grammar is sound throughout. There are no significant errors or awkward phrasing that detract from the overall readability of the essay.

Vocabulary and word expression: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates good command of vocabulary, with appropriate use of academic language. Some words or phrases could be more precise or better contextualized to support the argument, but overall, the essay is effective in conveying its message.

Overall, the essay is well-written, demonstrating good coherence, word structure, paragraph formation, language and grammar, and vocabulary and word expression. The argument is well-reasoned and supported, although some areas could be strengthened with more detailed evidence and analysis. The essay receives a score of 5.5 out of 6.

shoemugger
Please can someone review my attempt at the prompt:

The prompt claims that while coffee's consumed by adults increases with age from 10-60, the inverse is true for cola consumption. Further, it notes that given an increasing aging population, there should be a transfer in investment allocation from Cola Loca into Early Bird Coffee. This is a slippery slope as the argument relies heavily on loose claims brought forth by surveys and assumes, potentially incorrectly, current trends in the market. Further, we know nothing more about the invested companies other than their names and as such should have a better understanding of their business model before transferring any investments. Due to these reasons, the argument is uncompelling and should be explored further.

Firstly the argument relies heavily on studies, but, only details a quick summation of these studies while leaving significant questions unanswered. For example, did the studies take into account the population as a whole or only certain more health minded subsections? Such information is vital if we are to understand potential skews in the data which may under or over represent the consumption of any individual beverage. It would be helpful if the author detailed the premise of the studies, how they were conducted, and quantitative outcomes of these studies.

Secondly, the argument is potentially harming itself by proving a long time horizon on trends in the market. There may be an up shift in Cola consumption in the last 2-5 years that is missed because of downward trajectory of the 40 year trend line. This information is critical if we are to understand future trends in the market surrounding these beverages. The author should showcase a shorter time span to better understand current consumption frequencies.

Finally, the author makes the unwise decision to recommend transferring investments into Early Bird Coffee from Cola Loca. Other than the names of the companies, we know nothing about their business model or their financial strength. Cola Loca could be a multinational conglomerate that could have stronger holdings in coffee industry than Early Bird Coffee! It would be unwise to make any investment decision before understanding such fundamentals of the companies mentioned. The argument would be strengthened if it provided greater detail about each company.

To conclude the prompt fails to convince the audience as it does not take into account critical points that would strengthen the argument. A better understanding of the studies, current trends, and the companies highlighted would serve to bolster the argument.
User avatar
austin316
Joined: 07 Nov 2022
Last visit: 21 Jan 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 618
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q86 V82 DI86
GPA: 8.81
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q86 V82 DI86
Posts: 55
Kudos: 19
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Evaluation Request


The Prompt: “Studies suggest that an average coffee drinker’s consumption of coffee increases with age, from age 10 through age 60. Even after age 60, coffee consumption remains high. The average cola drinker’s consumption of cola, however, declines with increasing age. Both of these trends have remained stable for the past 40 years. Given that the number of older adults will significantly increase as the population ages over the next 20 years, it follows that the demand for coffee will increase and the demand for cola will decrease during this period. We should, therefore, consider transferring our investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The argument appearing as part of a business plan states that the investment and financial consulting firm should consider transferring their investments from a cola company (Cola Loca) to a coffee company (Early Bird Coffee). This recommendation has been made based on studies, the implication of whose have been presented as a fact.

Firstly, the implications of the studies mentioned in the argument have been assumed as facts. No evidence has been provided to support these implications. One of the ways to strengthen the argument could have been supplying detailed implications of the study. For example, the sample size, and demographics of the population which was studies. Further, the argument compares the increase in consumption of coffee, with the decrease in consumption of cola without comparing their absolute values. In order to compare the consumptions of coffee with the consumption of cola, a comparison based on a uniform metric, for example - milliliter consumed per person, should have been made.

Secondly, the argument is based on unsubstantiated unstated assumptions which need to be addressed. The fact that the trends of consumption for coffee and cola has remained stable for the past 40 years, does not mean that it would continue to remain stable in the next 20 years. Further, the argument also assumes that that as the population ages in the next 20 years, so will the number of older adults increase. The recommendation assumes that in the next 20 years, the number of old adults loosing their lives will be significantly less than the number of adults aging. This is a far-fetched assumption, which needs to be backed by relevant data - for example, the average life expectancy of the current population.

Thirdly, based on the claim that the demand for coffee will increase, while that of cola will decrease during the next 20 years, the author recommends that the investment and financial consulting firm should transfer their investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee. The author applies the general prediction to these two companies without considering the possibility that these companies may not follow this general trend. The argument would have been stronger, if the fundamental metrics of the two companies, such as revenue growth, and current and projected market share, were provided in order to justify this change in investment.

Hence, this argument is flawed because of the aforementioned reasons. It needs substantiated data to strengthen its claims, and the author's line of reasoning needs a correction.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,304
Own Kudos:
49,310
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,180
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,304
Kudos: 49,310
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6

Coherence and Connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay demonstrates a strong level of coherence and connectivity. The ideas are logically connected, and the essay follows a clear structure with well-developed paragraphs. Transitions between ideas are smooth and help maintain the flow of the argument.

Word Structure: 5.5/6
The essay effectively utilizes a variety of sentence structures, which adds clarity and complexity to the writing. The vocabulary used is appropriate and demonstrates a good command of language. There are a few minor instances where sentence structures could be further varied for enhanced readability.

Paragraph Structure and Formation: 5.5/6
The essay is well-structured, with each paragraph focusing on a specific point and providing clear topic sentences. The paragraphs are adequately developed, providing relevant analysis and explanations to support the argument. The organization of ideas within paragraphs could be slightly improved in a few instances.

Language and Grammar: 5.5/6
The language used in the essay is generally clear, concise, and appropriate for the task. The grammar is sound, with only minor errors or awkward phrasing. There are a few instances where sentence structures could be refined for smoother expression.

Vocabulary and Word Expression: 5.5/6
The vocabulary used in the essay is varied and demonstrates a good range of word choices. The writer effectively conveys their ideas using precise and appropriate terminology. There are a few instances where more nuanced or sophisticated vocabulary could have been employed, but overall, the vocabulary usage is strong.

Overall, the essay demonstrates a strong command of writing skills, with minor areas for improvement. The analysis is well-developed and effectively critiques the provided argument, identifying its weaknesses and suggesting areas for improvement.

austin316
AWA Evaluation Request


The Prompt: “Studies suggest that an average coffee drinker’s consumption of coffee increases with age, from age 10 through age 60. Even after age 60, coffee consumption remains high. The average cola drinker’s consumption of cola, however, declines with increasing age. Both of these trends have remained stable for the past 40 years. Given that the number of older adults will significantly increase as the population ages over the next 20 years, it follows that the demand for coffee will increase and the demand for cola will decrease during this period. We should, therefore, consider transferring our investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The argument appearing as part of a business plan states that the investment and financial consulting firm should consider transferring their investments from a cola company (Cola Loca) to a coffee company (Early Bird Coffee). This recommendation has been made based on studies, the implication of whose have been presented as a fact.

Firstly, the implications of the studies mentioned in the argument have been assumed as facts. No evidence has been provided to support these implications. One of the ways to strengthen the argument could have been supplying detailed implications of the study. For example, the sample size, and demographics of the population which was studies. Further, the argument compares the increase in consumption of coffee, with the decrease in consumption of cola without comparing their absolute values. In order to compare the consumptions of coffee with the consumption of cola, a comparison based on a uniform metric, for example - milliliter consumed per person, should have been made.

Secondly, the argument is based on unsubstantiated unstated assumptions which need to be addressed. The fact that the trends of consumption for coffee and cola has remained stable for the past 40 years, does not mean that it would continue to remain stable in the next 20 years. Further, the argument also assumes that that as the population ages in the next 20 years, so will the number of older adults increase. The recommendation assumes that in the next 20 years, the number of old adults loosing their lives will be significantly less than the number of adults aging. This is a far-fetched assumption, which needs to be backed by relevant data - for example, the average life expectancy of the current population.

Thirdly, based on the claim that the demand for coffee will increase, while that of cola will decrease during the next 20 years, the author recommends that the investment and financial consulting firm should transfer their investments from Cola Loca to Early Bird Coffee. The author applies the general prediction to these two companies without considering the possibility that these companies may not follow this general trend. The argument would have been stronger, if the fundamental metrics of the two companies, such as revenue growth, and current and projected market share, were provided in order to justify this change in investment.

Hence, this argument is flawed because of the aforementioned reasons. It needs substantiated data to strengthen its claims, and the author's line of reasoning needs a correction.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts