lahotis
Sentence 1: Princeton built 300 houses on a large portion of the 210-acre site of the Battle of Princeton, one of only eight Revolutionary War battlefields that
remain undeveloped.
Sentence 2: One of the books that
rests on the table reminds me of her
I understand why second sentence is correct but not able to comprehend the first one. Shouldn't it be
remainsThanks
Dear
lahotis,
I'm happy to help.
Part of what's tricky here is the concept of a
vital noun modifier. Here's what I mean. Suppose we have the structure,
....
, one of the six X that __________ .....
The question arises, what does the modifying clause beginning with "
that" modify? Does it modify the "
six X" or can it modify the "
one"? The surprising answer: actually, depending on context, it could modify either.
You see, say in that second sentence, the modifier "
of the books" is a vital noun modifier, a.k.a. a restrictive modifier. That it to say, we would have no idea what the identity of the "
one" would be,
one what?, without that prepositional phrase.
A vital noun modifier can come between a noun and a second modifier, thus disrupting the common pattern of the Modifier Touch Rule. The modifier "
that" clause in #2 is a modifier that is separated from the pronoun it modifies ("
one") by a vital noun modifier.
By contrast, in #1, the ordinary Modifier Touch Rule is in effect, because "
that" modifies "
eight Revolutionary War battlefields," the noun it touches.
For more on vital noun modifiers, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/that-vs-which-on-the-gmat/https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... modifiers/For more on the Modifier Touch Rule, see:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2013/modifiers- ... orrection/The really important thing to understand: Folks think that the GMAT SC just is about grammar. Well, of course, there's grammar you need to know, but more important than grammar is logic.
Logic always trumps grammar. For this distinction --- in the "
one of six X that ..." construction, does the "
that" clause modify the "
one" or the "
six X"? --- for that distinction, we need to look past the mere grammar to the logic of the situation and the deep meaning of what is being communicated. We absolutely cannot resolve this question using grammar alone. Here, as often on the GMAT SC, there's no escape from engaging with logic & meaning.
Does all this make sense?
Mike