Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 100%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Susan: The President claims to understand the problems faced by the poor. I don’t think he can make such a claim. The President came from a wealthy family and has never had to work for a living or suffer the problems of poverty.
Paul: Your reasoning is flawed. After all, you yourself come from a comfortably middle-class family and have never been poor either.
Which of the following possible responses by Susan would most directly address Paul’s criticism?
A. I am not the President, so understanding and solving the problems faced by the poor is not my responsibility. B. I may have been middle-class, but I was raised in a post-industrial city with a large proportion of poor people, and I saw how they suffered. C. I never claimed to understand the problems faced by the poor, but the President has made such a claim. D. It is true that I have never been poor, but I have never been as wealthy as the President is, either. E. My family was a poor immigrant family as few as fifty years ago. All they have, they earned through their own hard work.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
I think C. Susan says: The president cannot claim that he understands the problems of poor coz he never came back from a poor family. Paul says to Susan: You are wrong coz you never came from a poor family and hail from a middle class family.
The stat which Susan can make is that she never claims that she understands the problems of poor.
A. I am not the President, so understanding and solving the problems faced by the poor is not my responsibility. -If susan don't have any idea about poors, she would not have made the claim about president. B. I may have been middle-class, but I was raised in a post-industrial city with a large proportion of poor people, and I saw how they suffered. -May be President has also stayed in such an area. She is just saying the president is from wealthy family. C. I never claimed to understand the problems faced by the poor, but the President has made such a claim. - Same as problem as in A D. It is true that I have never been poor, but I have never been as wealthy as the President is, either. - We don't know the level of wealth required to understand poors. E. My family was a poor immigrant family as few as fifty years ago. All they have, they earned through their own hard work Correct. Susan has claimed that President is from rich family and Paul has claimed that susan is also from a comfortably middle-class. This means that Paul is putting a question on how wealthy her family is. For which Susan is replying by sayin her family was also very poor sometime back.
Susan: The President claims to understand the problems faced by the poor. I don’t thinkhe can make such a claim. The President came from a wealthy family and has never had to work for a living or suffer the problems of poverty.
Paul: Your reasoning is flawed. After all, you yourself come from a comfortably middle-class family and have never been poor either.
Susan's point is if you are not from a poor family you cannot uderstand poor. Paul instead makes a mistake of directly comparing Susan with President. There arre 2 ways to defending for Susan 1> Susan is from poor family. 2> Susan is not president.
But if he prooves that he is poor, does it really make him to the point. I mean , even if he is very poor but is his argument about him being a president. Options with this reasoning is very tentative but I think its not what Susan is arguing for. Note the opening statement "President claims ...."
Which of the following possible responses by Susan would most directly address Paul’s criticism?
A. I am not the President, so understanding and solving the problems faced by the poor is not my responsibility. It can be an option, but hold it B. I may have been middle-class, but I was raised in a post-industrial city with a large proportion of poor people, and I saw how they suffered. OUT C. I never claimed to understand the problems faced by the poor, but the President has made such a claim. Same as A. But here he directly refers to the premise on which his argument depends. It is more direct. This is the answer. If C would not have been present I would have gone for A
D. It is true that I have never been poor, but I have never been as wealthy as the President is, either. OUT E. My family was a poor immigrant family as few as fifty years ago. All they have, they earned through their own hard work.
Susan: The President claims to understand the problems faced by the poor. I don’t think he can make such a claim. The President came from a wealthy family and has never had to work for a living or suffer the problems of poverty.
Paul: Your reasoning is flawed. After all, you yourself come from a comfortably middle-class family and have never been poor either.
Which of the following possible responses by Susan would most directly address Paul’s criticism?
A. I am not the President, so understanding and solving the problems faced by the poor is not my responsibility. B. I may have been middle-class, but I was raised in a post-industrial city with a large proportion of poor people, and I saw how they suffered. C. I never claimed to understand the problems faced by the poor, but the President has made such a claim. D. It is true that I have never been poor, but I have never been as wealthy as the President is, either. E. My family was a poor immigrant family as few as fifty years ago. All they have, they earned through their own hard work.
Show more
I choose C as my answer choice. Susan was talking about the President, yet Paul chose to talk about Susan to elustrate his point. Whether Susan understands the poor is irrelavant to what she claims about the President.
:roll: Now I'm getting confused. The question is asking - "Which of the following possible responses by Susan would most directly address Paul’s criticism?"
Whereas option C doesn't address Paul's criticism.
Btw, whats the OA ?
Show more
Paul: Your reasoning is flawed. After all, you yourself come from a comfortably middle-class family and have never been poor either.
What reasoning ???? The reasoning is if President is not poor he should not be eligible.
" After all, you yourself come from a comfortably middle-class family and have never been poor either " is just a supportive premise to support his claim.
:roll: Now I'm getting confused. The question is asking - "Which of the following possible responses by Susan would most directly address Paul’s criticism?"
Whereas option C doesn't address Paul's criticism.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.