generis
Project SC Butler: Day 22 Sentence Correction (SC2)
The unskilled workers at the Allenby plant realized that their hourly rate of $4.11 to $4.75 was better than
many nearby factory wages.
(A) many nearby factory wages
(B) many wages in nearby factories
(C) what are offered by many nearby factories
(D) it is in many nearby factories
(E) that offered by many nearby factories
OFFICIAL EXPLANATIONTo be clear and logical, comparisons should be made between like items.
Choices A and B, however, compare an hourly rate of pay not with another rate, but with actual
wages.
These choices are also imprecise in that
many modifies
wages rather than
factories.
In C,
what is imprecise as a substitute for
hourly rate, and
in D
it refers illogically to the Allenby workers' rate, which cannot be said to be
in . . . nearby factories.Both choices illogically shift away from the past tense in one part of the comparison to the present tense in the other part;
C compounds the error by using a plural rather than a singular verb.
Choice E is best because it uses the correct pronoun,
that, and does not introduce inconsistencies of tense.
COMMENTSRule #1: Read the instructions, especially when they are in red typeface. What does this sentence MEAN?Workers at one particular plant realized that their pay rate was better than the pay rate offered by many nearby factories.As a piece of information, the sentence is incredibly boring.
As a piece of propaganda, the sentence confirms a particular opinion about "unskilled workers" and what they deserve.
(I do not share this view.)
In RC and CR, many questions require the reader to see the material
from the author's perspective.I am not fond of exercises in futility.
So I ask posters to lay out meaning because rules will get you only so far in SC,
and the best way to understand meaning is to rephrase it.
This one time I will ignore the omission of an answer to a direct request.
Suggestion #1: Avoid the assertion that an option is "awkward" unless you can specify why the construction is awkward.
Suppose you were to ask a friend about his or her blind date.
The friend replies, "It was awkward." The end.
Um, what, exactly, happened on this date?
- Was the person secretly a political wackadoo who recommended
Mein Kampf for its excellent ideas?
-- Did your friend discover at dinner that her date believed he had been visited by little green men from Mars?
"Option ____ is awkward because ________."
Male friend, reporting:
"The date was awkward because my date's burly ex-boyfriend
sat at the dinner table next to us and decided to make good use of his recent steroid shot
by launching into a Swiss yodel ten minutes after our food arrived
while she—shocked or resigned or insensate or all three—seemed not to notice
anything,
not even the fact that after said serenade
I was bug-eyed and
he, still yodeling, was escorted out the door."
Now "awkward" has specific content.
The most consistent and best analysis of the answer choices is a close call between
kookies and
Harshgmat .
Solution: KUDOS to both.