GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 14:34

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1563
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2019, 00:26
bashdeep covered this question pretty well above. Toward/towards is a non-issue. One other thing worth noting is that E switches to an adverbial modifier ("allowing . . . "), thereby creating the impression that it is the court's work, rather than the doctrine, that allows patent law to accommodate reason.
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Retired Moderator
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5116
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Feb 2019, 23:13
Top Contributor
Those who still entertain doubts about the difference between toward and towards, may please go through the given page.

<https://www.grammarly.com/blog/toward-towards/>
_________________
Are you stuck around 630? If you can't make out how to pole-vault above the 630-barrier, you can do so with my one-to-one lessons. (+919884544509)
Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2017
Posts: 86
Location: India
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Feb 2019, 04:34
disenapati wrote:
The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Supreme Court decision went a long way toward establishing the propriety of the doctrine of equivalents, which allows patent law to accommodate reason outside of its exact jurisdiction, and explaining how and when it was to be used.

A. toward establishing the propriety of the doctrine of equivalents, which allows patent law to accommodate reason outside of its exact jurisdiction, and explaining how and when it was

B. toward establishing the propriety of the doctrine of equivalents, which allow patent law to accommodate reason outside of its exact jurisdiction, and to explain how and when it was

C. towards the establishment of the propriety of the doctrine of equivalents, which allows patent law to accommodate reason outside of its exact jurisdiction, and explaining how and when it was

D. toward establishing the propriety of the doctrine of equivalents, which allows patent law to accommodate reason outside of its exact jurisdiction, and explained how and when they were

E. towards establishing the propriety of the doctrine of equivalents, allowing patent law to accommodate reason outside of its exact jurisdiction, and explaining how and when they were

My understanding of this question and the logic I followed:

1) toward and towards are both correct. The usage differs in practical applications in UK and US English but both are accepted. Don't eliminate ans choices based on this.

2) Understand the meaning of sentence first. The doctrine of equivalents allowed the patent law to accommodate reason outside its jurisdiction. Supreme court made a move towards establishing propriety of this doctrine. The 'which' is correctly modifying 'equivalents' in all options except in E where 'allowing' is modifying 'the propriety of doctine...'. Therefore, eliminate E.

3) Now focus on parallelism. Note that 'accommodate' is not expected to be parallel with 'explain' because of the comma before 'and'. Making it parallel changes the meaning of the sentence. It is expected that 'establishing' and 'explaining' should be parallel. So options B, C and D are out. Option A is left.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2018
Posts: 83
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Mar 2019, 03:46
B is wrong as it uses the incorrect verb form ‘allow’. E and D use the wrong verb form ‘were’. C is unnecessarily complicated, with the phrase’ towards the establishment of’. A is the best answer
Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Posts: 13
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Aug 2019, 10:17
"allows" will eliminate B/E
"it vs they" will eliminate D
establishing vs the establishment of eliminate C
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2018
Posts: 13
WE: Operations (Computer Software)
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2019, 00:06
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1563
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2019, 00:11
_________________

Dmitry Farber | Manhattan Prep GMAT Instructor | San Diego

Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile |
Manhattan GMAT Reviews
Intern
Joined: 05 Sep 2018
Posts: 11
GMAT 1: 610 Q44 V30
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2019, 00:25
1
I believe that we should not get confused with toward/towards because toward is not the verb in above sentence. Stop looking for SV error with toward in above sentence.
_________________
No Option to DIE. It's DO or DO.
Re: The 1950 Graver Tank & Manufacturing Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. Sup   [#permalink] 29 Aug 2019, 00:25

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 28 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by