|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
19 Mar 2021, 00:06
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
70% (01:26) correct
30%
(01:46)
wrong
based on 232
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The Axis Technology Company plans to spend the $30 million it holds in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure, but some investors have opposed this move, claiming that it is unwise for the company to completely liquidate its reserves.
A) the $30 million it holds in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
B) $30 million that it is holding in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
C) the $30 million held in reserves by it on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
D) $30 million it holds in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
E) $30 million held by it in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
19 Mar 2021, 00:09
Kudos
Bookmarks
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION
Nothing is wrong with the verbs in any of the options.
The word held in options C and E is a past participle (a verbED), not a past tense verb.
Held is part of a reduced relative clause: . . . the $30 million THAT IS held by [Axis Technology].
To "reduce" a relative clause, we shorten it.
Remove the relative pronoun (that).
Remove the to be verb, if present (is).
Keep the past participle (the verbED) (held).
Full relative clause:. . . the $30 million that is held by it.
Reduced relative clause: . . . the $30 million held by it.
Options A and D omit the word that (and are not reduced relative clauses): . . . $30 million [THAT] it holds in reserves.
Option B includes "that" and uses the permissible present progressive: . . . $30 million that it is holding in reserves.
No clear error exists in the verbs (holds, is holding) and verbals (held).
Just a heads up. I want to make sure that you remain aware of the ways in which past participles can be sneaky.
Held is not a reason to eliminate an option, although the passivity inherent in the construction held by it is a reason to eliminate option C.
Now, if the construction were ". . . the $30 million that it held in reserves . . .," we would have a verb tense problem.
The liquidation of the $30 million has not yet happened, so in verb form, past tense held would not make sense.
• Split #1: The definite article THE
This prompt is an instance in which the definite article the is needed to convey proper meaning quickly.
The non-underlined part suggests that by spending this $30 million, the company will end up completely liquidating its reserves.
In other words, to spend $30 million = to spend all the money in reserve.
To convey this meaning correctly and quickly, the word the must be placed before $30 million.
Otherwise, the company could have more money in reserves, out of which $30 million is being spent on something.
Options B, D, and E fail to place the before $30 million.
Furthermore, options B, D, and E are very similar; they are almost the same sentence with slightly different phrasing.
Option B is not as concise as options D and E, but option B is in the active voice.
Option E contains a trace of awkwardness and passivity.
These differences are very subtle.
Strategy tip: when answers are very similar to one another, so similar that discerning a real "standout" is difficult, all are likely to be incorrect.
ELIMINATE B, D, and E
• Split #2: Style
Option A: [that] it holds in reserves
Option C: [that is] held in reserves by it
Option C is written in passive voice, which in this instance is inferior to the active voice displayed in option A.
In these examples, the noun modifier (of "the $30 million") is a truncated or elided that-clause.
Well, that is a pronoun and a subject.
Option A displays the more direct and forceful construction: subject + verb + verb modifier [it + holds + in reserves].
Option C displays the "flabby by way of preposition" construction: verb + verb modifier + BY + subject.
Option C also tacitly contains the passive verb is.
Finally, option A is more concise than option C. Although option C contains only one more word than option A does, option A is still shorter. Overall, the construction in (A) is tighter.
ELIMINATE C
The best answer is A.
COMMENTS
mohammadfaraaz123 , welcome to SC Butler.
Yet again, I find a nice mixture of styles and participants.
As I have mentioned, diversity of approach, analysis, style, and presentation helps future aspirants; a post that resonates with Person A will be different from the post that resonates with Person B.
I might also add that writing posts helps those who post.
If you force yourself to articulate an explanation, you cement your understanding of both the material and the patterns.
You learn the patterns without realizing that you are doing so.
Trust me on this one.
These answers range from very good to outstanding, except that almost all (all?) include a sorta big error.
Held is a past participle, not a past tense verb. Despite their name, past participles do not have tense.
Suppose that you were on a witness stand.
Suppose that I were to show you a picture of Mohandas Gandhi.
I could ask any one of you, in the present moment, "Does this image accurately represent the person known to you as Mohandas Gandhi?"
Just as held is a past participle, so too is known.
I would actually be asking you, "Does this image accurately represent the person WHO IS known to you as Mohandas Gandhi?"
This "known" is true right now—so, too, is held.
In any event, with the exception of that one somewhat glaring error, you all have done well.
Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
Quote:
• NOTE
Nothing is wrong with the verbs in any of the options.
The word held in options C and E is a past participle (a verbED), not a past tense verb.
Held is part of a reduced relative clause: . . . the $30 million THAT IS held by [Axis Technology].
To "reduce" a relative clause, we shorten it.
Remove the relative pronoun (that).
Remove the to be verb, if present (is).
Keep the past participle (the verbED) (held).
Full relative clause:. . . the $30 million that is held by it.
Reduced relative clause: . . . the $30 million held by it.
Options A and D omit the word that (and are not reduced relative clauses): . . . $30 million [THAT] it holds in reserves.
Option B includes "that" and uses the permissible present progressive: . . . $30 million that it is holding in reserves.
No clear error exists in the verbs (holds, is holding) and verbals (held).
Just a heads up. I want to make sure that you remain aware of the ways in which past participles can be sneaky.
Held is not a reason to eliminate an option, although the passivity inherent in the construction held by it is a reason to eliminate option C.
Now, if the construction were ". . . the $30 million that it held in reserves . . .," we would have a verb tense problem.
The liquidation of the $30 million has not yet happened, so in verb form, past tense held would not make sense.
• Split #1: The definite article THE
This prompt is an instance in which the definite article the is needed to convey proper meaning quickly.
The non-underlined part suggests that by spending this $30 million, the company will end up completely liquidating its reserves.
In other words, to spend $30 million = to spend all the money in reserve.
To convey this meaning correctly and quickly, the word the must be placed before $30 million.
Otherwise, the company could have more money in reserves, out of which $30 million is being spent on something.
Options B, D, and E fail to place the before $30 million.
Furthermore, options B, D, and E are very similar; they are almost the same sentence with slightly different phrasing.
Option B is not as concise as options D and E, but option B is in the active voice.
Option E contains a trace of awkwardness and passivity.
These differences are very subtle.
Strategy tip: when answers are very similar to one another, so similar that discerning a real "standout" is difficult, all are likely to be incorrect.
ELIMINATE B, D, and E
• Split #2: Style
Option A: [that] it holds in reserves
Option C: [that is] held in reserves by it
Option C is written in passive voice, which in this instance is inferior to the active voice displayed in option A.
In these examples, the noun modifier (of "the $30 million") is a truncated or elided that-clause.
Well, that is a pronoun and a subject.
Option A displays the more direct and forceful construction: subject + verb + verb modifier [it + holds + in reserves].
Option C displays the "flabby by way of preposition" construction: verb + verb modifier + BY + subject.
Option C also tacitly contains the passive verb is.
Finally, option A is more concise than option C. Although option C contains only one more word than option A does, option A is still shorter. Overall, the construction in (A) is tighter.
ELIMINATE C
The best answer is A.
COMMENTS
mohammadfaraaz123 , welcome to SC Butler.
Yet again, I find a nice mixture of styles and participants.
As I have mentioned, diversity of approach, analysis, style, and presentation helps future aspirants; a post that resonates with Person A will be different from the post that resonates with Person B.
I might also add that writing posts helps those who post.
If you force yourself to articulate an explanation, you cement your understanding of both the material and the patterns.
You learn the patterns without realizing that you are doing so.
Trust me on this one.
These answers range from very good to outstanding, except that almost all (all?) include a sorta big error.
Held is a past participle, not a past tense verb. Despite their name, past participles do not have tense.
Suppose that you were on a witness stand.
Suppose that I were to show you a picture of Mohandas Gandhi.
I could ask any one of you, in the present moment, "Does this image accurately represent the person known to you as Mohandas Gandhi?"
Just as held is a past participle, so too is known.
I would actually be asking you, "Does this image accurately represent the person WHO IS known to you as Mohandas Gandhi?"
This "known" is true right now—so, too, is held.
In any event, with the exception of that one somewhat glaring error, you all have done well.
19 Mar 2021, 00:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
The Axis Technology Company plans to spend the $30 million it holds in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure, but some investors have opposed this move, claiming that it is unwise for the company to completely liquidate its reserves.
the $30 million vs $30 million
'the $30 million it holds' means the total amount that the company holds is exactly $30 million.
'$30 million' (without 'the') means that the company holds more than $30 million in reserves.
In the non-underlined part, it is mentioned 'it is unwise for the company to completely liquidate its reserves.'
So, use of the $30 million is correct.
Eliminate B, D, and E
A) the $30 million it holds in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
Correct
C) the $30 million held in reserves by it on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
Held means that the company holds no more, but the company still holds the money in reserves. So, held is incorrect.
Choice A is the answer.
the $30 million vs $30 million
'the $30 million it holds' means the total amount that the company holds is exactly $30 million.
'$30 million' (without 'the') means that the company holds more than $30 million in reserves.
In the non-underlined part, it is mentioned 'it is unwise for the company to completely liquidate its reserves.'
So, use of the $30 million is correct.
Eliminate B, D, and E
A) the $30 million it holds in reserves on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
Correct
C) the $30 million held in reserves by it on upgrading its software and hardware infrastructure,
Held means that the company holds no more, but the company still holds the money in reserves. So, held is incorrect.
Choice A is the answer.
