Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 02:14 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 02:14
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Nevernevergiveup
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Last visit: 20 Aug 2023
Posts: 998
Own Kudos:
3,080
 [22]
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 998
Kudos: 3,080
 [22]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
AaronPond
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
1,819
 [13]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Organizational Behavior
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 89
Kudos: 1,819
 [13]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
IanStewart
User avatar
GMAT Tutor
Joined: 24 Jun 2008
Last visit: 17 Apr 2026
Posts: 4,143
Own Kudos:
11,266
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,143
Kudos: 11,266
 [5]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
tjerkrintjema
Joined: 04 May 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2015
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 27
Kudos: 57
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Wow I had to read the question so many times, and i still get lost.
Would this question still classify under the 600-700 range or maybe because of the confusing language fall in the 700 range?
User avatar
Erjan_S
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Last visit: 08 May 2018
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 87
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GMAT 1: 620 Q36 V39
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 2: 650 Q47 V33
Posts: 102
Kudos: 206
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IanStewart
I find the wording of this question very confusing, for quite a few reasons. We need to make some assumptions unmentioned in the question to get the answer (for example, we need to assume that alarms never go off on the same day that a bear sneaks past the alarm system). And I had to read the part about how "sensitively calibrated" the alarm is a few times, because one wouldn't measure that by comparing false alarms to 'undetected bears'. Rather one would compare false alarms to detected bears. And I think it's problematic to ask for an "approximate probability", and then offer answer choices that differ by about 0.0025 (376/390 and 29/30 are only 0.0025 apart). Both answers give the "approximate probability" that the event happens, because both answers are nearly the same value.
.

I did find this question to be both confusing and clumsy, but I could not articulate reasons for this opinion as clearly, as you did! It is not a real GMAT question I think, do they do better job formulating actual GMAT questions?
User avatar
AnthonyRitz
User avatar
Stacy Blackman Consulting Director of Test Prep
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 238
Own Kudos:
432
 [3]
Given Kudos: 169
Affiliations: Stacy Blackman Consulting
Location: United States (DC)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
GPA: 3.11
WE:Education (Education)
GMAT 1: 790 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 238
Kudos: 432
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Erjan_S
IanStewart
I find the wording of this question very confusing, for quite a few reasons. We need to make some assumptions unmentioned in the question to get the answer (for example, we need to assume that alarms never go off on the same day that a bear sneaks past the alarm system). And I had to read the part about how "sensitively calibrated" the alarm is a few times, because one wouldn't measure that by comparing false alarms to 'undetected bears'. Rather one would compare false alarms to detected bears. And I think it's problematic to ask for an "approximate probability", and then offer answer choices that differ by about 0.0025 (376/390 and 29/30 are only 0.0025 apart). Both answers give the "approximate probability" that the event happens, because both answers are nearly the same value.
.

I did find this question to be both confusing and clumsy, but I could not articulate reasons for this opinion as clearly, as you did! It is not a real GMAT question I think, do they do better job formulating actual GMAT questions?

Erjan et al,

This question is not well-worded and is, I believe, retired by Veritas for that reason. The occasional clunker question happens to the best of us; sorry! You can expect to face questions on the actual GMAT that are clearer. I wouldn't worry about this one or its siblings (it comes from a set of four related to the same fact pattern).
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 22,268
Own Kudos:
26,521
 [3]
Given Kudos: 302
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 22,268
Kudos: 26,521
 [3]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nevernevergiveup
The bear alarm at Grizzly’s Peak ski resort sounds an average of once every thirty days, but the alarm is so sensitively calibrated that it sounds an average of ten false alarms for every undetected bear. Despite this, the alarm only sounds for three out of four bears that actually appear at the resort. On any given day at the resort, what is the approximate probability that there is neither an alarm nor an undetected bear?

(A) 224/365
(B) 13/14
(C) 14/15
(D) 376/390
(E) 29/30

Let x denote the number of undetected bears in the facility.

Since there are 10 false alarms for every undetected bear, the number of false alarms is 10x.

We are given that the alarm sounds for three out of four bears that actually appear at the resort, which means one out four bears is undetected. Since the number of undetected bears is x, the total number of bears is 4x and the number of detected bears (i.e. the number of times where the alarm sounds and there is indeed a bear in the facility) is 4x - x = 3x.

So, the alarm sounds 10x + 3x = 13x times (10x of which is false). Since the alarm sounds an average of once every thirty days, we can approximate the number of days until the alarm sounds 13x times by (13x)(30) = 390x.

Out of the 390x days, there are only 13x days with an alarm sounding and x days with an undetected bear. Thus, for 390x - (13x + x) = 376x days, there is neither an alarm sounding nor an undetected bear. Therefore, the approximate probability that there is neither an alarm sounding nor an undetected bear is 376x/390x = 376/390

Answer: D
avatar
UncleFrodo
Joined: 01 Nov 2015
Last visit: 24 Jan 2020
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
WE:Other (Other)
Posts: 11
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Aaron,

Thanks for sharing your way of solving question! It helps me to crack the question. However, I was a bit confused with this:
AaronPond

This means we can invent our own total amount...
and this
AaronPond

Thus, if we were to pick \(13*30=390\) as our total value

I didn't understand why we should invent total amount. Also it wasn't clear why it should be 13*30=390 as our total value and why you called it "total value". Or what "total value" of what?
I mean that we've got all info from the task and there is no ways of inventing something. And if we invent then what it symbolizes?
It is crystal clear that your matrix and math correct, but for me was a bit illogical.
But then I discover why i was so confused.
If we eliminate the idea of "invent our own total amount" (I am sorry for that) and say that we need to figure out number of events based on shared info than it works for me.

For instance, we know that once per 30 days we got an alarm. Alarm is specific event. On a flip side we got 29 our 30 days without alarm, so lets call it silence event.
We got 1 alarm event per 30 days, hence 13 alarms, which is the total number of alarms, we will get per 390 days.

To be more clear for this task we must say that each of this events (alarm of silence) can be true or false.
We know that there:
1. 3 true alarms (the alarm only sounds for three out of four bears that actually appear at the resort)
2. 10 false alarms (an average of ten false alarms for every undetected bear)
3. 1 false silence (the alarm only sounds for three out of four bears that actually appear at the resort)
4. X true silence (there is neither an alarm nor an undetected bear)
out of 390 events.
X = "total events" - "true alarms" - "false alarms" - "false silence"
X = 390 - 3 - 10 - 1 = 376
The answer is 376 true silence events out of 390 days -> 376/390
avatar
UncleFrodo
Joined: 01 Nov 2015
Last visit: 24 Jan 2020
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 73
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
WE:Other (Other)
Posts: 11
Kudos: 24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ScottTargetTestPrep
Nevernevergiveup
The bear alarm at Grizzly’s Peak ski resort sounds an average of once every thirty days, but the alarm is so sensitively calibrated that it sounds an average of ten false alarms for every undetected bear. Despite this, the alarm only sounds for three out of four bears that actually appear at the resort. On any given day at the resort, what is the approximate probability that there is neither an alarm nor an undetected bear?

(A) 224/365
(B) 13/14
(C) 14/15
(D) 376/390
(E) 29/30

Since the alarm only sounds for 3 out of 4 bears that actually appear at the resort, that means for every 4 bears appearing at the resort, 3 bears are detected and 1 bear is undetected. However, for every one undetected bear, there are 10 false alarms. So the number of alarms for the 3 detected bears = 3 and the number of alarms for the 1 undetected bear = 10. Thus for every 3 + 10 = 13 alarms, 3 bears will be detected, so the probability that a bear has actually been sighted, given that the alarm sounds, is 3/13.

Answer: B

Hi Scott, I think you posted a correct solution but for a different question. ;)
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 22,268
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 302
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 22,268
Kudos: 26,521
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UncleFrodo
ScottTargetTestPrep
Nevernevergiveup
The bear alarm at Grizzly’s Peak ski resort sounds an average of once every thirty days, but the alarm is so sensitively calibrated that it sounds an average of ten false alarms for every undetected bear. Despite this, the alarm only sounds for three out of four bears that actually appear at the resort. On any given day at the resort, what is the approximate probability that there is neither an alarm nor an undetected bear?

(A) 224/365
(B) 13/14
(C) 14/15
(D) 376/390
(E) 29/30

Since the alarm only sounds for 3 out of 4 bears that actually appear at the resort, that means for every 4 bears appearing at the resort, 3 bears are detected and 1 bear is undetected. However, for every one undetected bear, there are 10 false alarms. So the number of alarms for the 3 detected bears = 3 and the number of alarms for the 1 undetected bear = 10. Thus for every 3 + 10 = 13 alarms, 3 bears will be detected, so the probability that a bear has actually been sighted, given that the alarm sounds, is 3/13.

Answer: B

Hi Scott, I think you posted a correct solution but for a different question. ;)

Good call! Just adjusted my solution. Thanks!
User avatar
AaronPond
User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Joined: 01 Jul 2017
Last visit: 28 Jan 2026
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
1,819
 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Organizational Behavior
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 89
Kudos: 1,819
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
UncleFrodo

I didn't understand why we should invent total amount. Also it wasn't clear why it should be 13*30=390 as our total value and why you called it "total value". Or what "total value" of what?
I mean that we've got all info from the task and there is no ways of inventing something. And if we invent then what it symbolizes?
It is crystal clear that your matrix and math correct, but for me was a bit illogical.
But then I discover why i was so confused.
If we eliminate the idea of "invent our own total amount" (I am sorry for that) and say that we need to figure out number of events based on shared info than it works for me.

Great question, Uncle Frodo! The approach that I shared in my initial solution is actually a phenomenal strategy for a whole class of questions on the GMAT. I call this strategy "Easy Numbers" in my classes. Often, questions that give you ratios without total amounts feel very abstract. By definition, a probability is:

\(\frac{\text{# of occurrences of a specific event }}{\text{Total number of possible occurrences}}\)

Thus, if we want to calculate a probability, we need to know the total number of occurrences. However, in terms of this specific question, calculating a probability for "any given day" is a little nebulous. We have an ongoing process, with various, overlapping rates ("once every thirty days"... "ten false alarms for every undetected bear", etc.). We need to calculate an average daily rate, but what "total" will we use to actually calculate the probability? Total in a month? Total in a year? By choosing a number that makes the math easy, we turn a very abstract concept into a concrete, solvable approach. There won't be an integer count of "no alarms and no bears" in only 30 days. But in \(390\) days, we will have an integer count. As you can see, \(390\) is not an arbitrary number. It is the the number of days that allows us to get a pretty, "no-weird-decimal value" for the "no alarms and no bears" count that we need in the top part of the probability fraction. This is why chose \(390\) as my "total number of possible occurrences" value. It made for easy math.

As you can see, though, I was also trying to help as many readers as possible to not only answer this question, but see the strategic approach to many similar questions. "Easy Numbers" is powerful GMAT Jujitsu. It cuts through the crap of abstraction and gives test takers concrete leverage to solve any question that deals with percents or ratios without total amounts.
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,942
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,942
Kudos: 1,116
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
Math Expert
109715 posts
Tuck School Moderator
853 posts