Premise1: C grows beneath D.
Premise2: D provides sugar to C.
Premise3: C provides water to D.
Premise4: Relationship is mutual.
Conclusion: C beneath D seriously endangers the D.
(A) The number of wild mushrooms harvested has increased in recent years.
Does not point what happens to D because of this phenomenon, so not relavant.
(B) Chanterelles grow not only beneath Douglas firs but also beneath other host trees.
Does not point why C beneath D is bad for D.
(C) Many types of wild mushrooms are found only in forests and cannot easily be grown elsewhere.
Environment in which C grows does not explains why for D it is bad.
(D) The harvesting of wild mushrooms stimulates future growth of those mushrooms.
This may be true, however it does not attack conclusion at all on how this C and D relationship is bad for D.
(E) Young Douglas fir seedlings die without the nutrients and water provided by chanterelle filaments.
This destroys the conclusion. Conclusion says because of C and D relationship, D dies, however, this tells us because of relationship D infact survives because of relationship.
IMO E.