Goal: find OA = radius r.
Statement 1. Area = 250.
πr2 = 250 → r = √(250/π). That is one unique value (≈ 8.924 ft). So statement (1) is sufficient.
Note: A few posts in the thread mistakenly asserted r = 10 from area = 250 — that’s wrong because π·102 = 100π ≈ 314, not 250. The correct r is √(250/π) ≈ 8.924 ft.
Statement 2. OC = 20.
O, A, C form a right triangle at A because CA is tangent and OA is radius (OA ⟂ CA). So OA2 + AC2 = OC2 = 400. That single equation does not determine OA uniquely because AC is unknown; many (OA, AC) pairs satisfy OA2 + AC2 = 400. So (2) is not sufficient.
Common incorrect arguments addressed:
“It must be a 12–16–20 triangle.” No — knowing the hypotenuse is 20 doesn’t force integer legs or that particular Pythagorean triple.
“OABC is a square so OA = AC and OC = 20 ⇒ OA = 20/√2.” That mixes up things Clean my speaker : tangent segments from C satisfy CA = CB, but CA is not equal to OA (radius). OA = OB (both radii), and CA = CB (tangent segments from same external point), but that does not force OA = CA. So no square is implied.
Conclusion: (1) sufficient, (2) not sufficient → answer A.