GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 22 Apr 2019, 09:32

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Joined: 21 Dec 2010
Posts: 414
The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 29 Mar 2019, 08:40
1
1
Question 1
00:00

based on 93 sessions

35% (02:38) correct 65% (03:24) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 2
00:00

based on 89 sessions

75% (01:08) correct 25% (01:07) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 3
00:00

based on 90 sessions

49% (01:19) correct 51% (01:18) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 4
00:00

based on 78 sessions

35% (01:51) correct 65% (01:41) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 5
00:00

based on 79 sessions

85% (00:59) correct 15% (01:00) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 6
00:00

based on 86 sessions

45% (01:15) correct 55% (01:24) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

Question 7
00:00

based on 76 sessions

70% (01:17) correct 30% (01:24) wrong

### HideShow timer Statistics

The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the extent of the President’s authority to involve United States troops in conflicts with other nations in the absence of a declaration of war. Instead, the question of the President’s authority in this matter falls in the hazy area of concurrent, a concurrent resolution power, where authority is not expressly allocated to either the President or the Congress. The Constitution gives Congress the basic power to declare war, as well as the authority to raise and support armies and a navy, enact regulations for the control of the military, and provide for the common defense. The President, on the other hand, in addition to being obligated to execute the laws of the land, including commitments negotiated by defense treaties, is named commander in chief of the armed forces and is empowered to appoint envoys and make treaties with the consent of the Senate. Although this allocation of powers does not expressly address the use of armed forces short of a declared war, the spirit of the Constitution at least requires that Congress should be involved in the decision to deploy troops, and in passing the War Powers Resolution of 1973, Congress has at last reclaimed a role in such decisions.

Historically, United States Presidents have not waited for the approval of Congress before involving United States troops in conflicts in which a state of war was not declared. One scholar has identified 199 military engagements that occurred without the consent of Congress, ranging from Jefferson’s conflict with the Barbary pirates to Nixon’s invasion of Cambodia during the Vietnam conflict, which President Nixon argued was justified because his role as commander in chief allowed him almost unlimited discretion (power of free decision or latitude of choice within certain legal bounds “reached the age of discretion”) over the deployment of troops. However, the Vietnam conflict, never a declared war, represented a turning point in Congress’s tolerance of presidential discretion in the deployment of troops in undeclared wars. Galvanized by the human and monetary cost of those hostilities and showing a new determination to fulfill its proper role, Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a statute designed to ensure that the collective judgment of both Congress and the President would be applied to the involvement of United States troops in foreign conflicts.

The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces have actually been deployed. Most important, the resolution allows Congress to veto the involvement once it begins, and requires the President, in most cases, to end the involvement within 60 days unless Congress specifically authorizes the military operation to continue. In its final section, by declaring the resolution is not intended to alter the constitutional authority of either Congress or the President, the resolution asserts that congressional involvement in decisions to use armed force is in accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution.
1. In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with

(A) showing how the Vietnam conflict led to a new interpretation of the Constitution’s provisions for use of the military
(B) arguing that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is an attempt to reclaim a share of constitutionally concurrent power that had been usurped by the President
(C) outlining the history of the struggle between the President and Congress for control of the military
(D) providing examples of conflicts inherent in the Constitution’s approach to a balance of powers
(E) explaining how the War Powers Resolution of 1973 alters the Constitution to eliminate an overlap of authority

Spoiler: :: OA
B

2. With regard to the use of United States troops in a foreign conflict without a formal declaration of war by the United States, the author believes that the United States Constitution does which one of the following?

(A) assumes that the President and Congress will agree on whether troops should be used
(B) provides a clear-cut division of authority between the President and Congress in the decision to use troops
(C) assigns a greater role to the Congress than to the President in deciding whether troops should be used
(D) grants final authority to the President to decide whether to use troops
(E) intends that both the President and Congress should be involved in the decision to use troops

Spoiler: :: OA
E

3. The passage suggests that each of the following contributed to Congress’s enacting the War Powers Resolution of 1973 EXCEPT

(A) a change in the attitude in Congress toward exercising its role in the use of armed forces
(B) the failure of Presidents to uphold commitments specified in defense treaties
(C) Congress’s desire to be consulted concerning United States military actions instigated by the President
(D) the amount of money spent on recent conflicts waged without a declaration of war
(E) the number of lives lost in Vietnam

Spoiler: :: OA
B

4. It can be inferred from the passage that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is applicable only in “the absence of a declaration of war” (lines 48-49) because

(A) Congress has enacted other laws that already set out presidential requirements for situations in which war has been declared
(B) by virtue of declaring war, Congress already implicitly participates in the decision to deploy troops
(C) the President generally receives broad public support during wars that have been formally declared by Congress
(D) Congress felt that the President should be allowed unlimited discretion in cases in which war has been declared
(E) the United States Constitution already explicitly defines the reporting and consulting requirements of the President in cases in which war has been declared

Spoiler: :: OA
B

5. In can be inferred from the passage that the author believes that the War Powers Resolution of 1973

(A) is not in accord with the explicit roles of the President and Congress as defined in the Constitution
(B) interferes with the role of the President as commander in chief of the armed forces
(C) signals Congress’s commitment to fulfill a role intended for it by the Constitution
(D) fails explicitly to address the use of armed forces in the absence of a declaration of war
(E) confirms the role historically assumed by Presidents

Spoiler: :: OA
C

6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding the invasion of Cambodia?

(A) Because it was undertaken without the consent of Congress, it violated the intent and spirit of the Constitution.

(B) Because it galvanized support for the War Powers Resolution, it contributed indirectly to the expansion of presidential authority.

(C) Because it was necessitated by a defense treaty, it required the consent of Congress.

(D) It served as a precedent for a new interpretation of the constitutional limits on the President’s authority to deploy troops.

(E) It differed from the actions of past Presidents in deploying United States troops in conflicts without a declaration of war by Congress.

Spoiler: :: OA
A

7. According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to

(A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war
(B) consult with the leaders of both house of Congress before deploying armed forces
(C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress
(D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces
(E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is declared

Spoiler: :: OA
D

• Source: LSAT Official PrepTest 2 (October 1991)
• Difficulty Level: 700

Originally posted by garimavyas on 07 May 2011, 02:01.
Last edited by SajjadAhmad on 29 Mar 2019, 08:40, edited 2 times in total.
Manager
Status: MBA Aspirant
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 134
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

26 Jul 2011, 09:04
Hi,

1) d
2) e
3) d
4) b
5) b
6) d
7) b
Manager
Status: MBA Aspirant
Joined: 12 Jun 2010
Posts: 134
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Aug 2011, 03:28
Intern
Joined: 04 Aug 2011
Posts: 27
Location: United States
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

20 Nov 2011, 18:49

1) A
2) E
3) B
4) E
5) C
6) D
7) D

Thanks,
ckarimanoor
Director
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 788
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Nov 2011, 01:14
my turn: BDAB for first 4
I see that lsat passage can bi a little harder than gmat ones. But the lsat questions in much harder than gmat ones because they require the tough inference.

do you see that.
Senior Manager
Joined: 18 Aug 2009
Posts: 335
Schools: UT at Austin, Indiana State University, UC at Berkeley
WE 1: 5.5
WE 2: 5.5
WE 3: 6.0
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2011, 07:46
1 A
2 E
3 B
4 B
5 C
6 A
7 D

To have OAs would be very helpful...
_________________
Never give up,,,
Manager
Joined: 24 Jul 2011
Posts: 178
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q50 V19
GMAT 2: 650 Q49 V28
GMAT 3: 690 Q50 V34
WE: Information Technology (Investment Banking)
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Aug 2014, 23:49
OA:

Can someone please explain 1, 4 and 6?
_________________
Middle of nowhere!
Senior Manager
Joined: 05 Nov 2012
Posts: 435
Concentration: Technology, Other
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Aug 2014, 02:27
1
Time taken 16 mins.
1.in the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) showing how the Vietnam conflict led to a new interpretation of the Constitution’s provisions for use of the military
(B) arguing that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is an attempt to reclaim a share of constitutionally concurrent power that had been usurped by the President
(C) outlining the history of the struggle between the President and Congress for control of the military
(D) providing examples of conflicts inherent in the Constitution’s approach to a balance of powers
(E) explaining how the War Powers Resolution of 1973 alters the Constitution to eliminate an overlap of authority

2.With regard to the use of United States troops in a foreign conflict without a formal declaration of war by the United States, the author believes that the United States Constitution does which one of the following?
(A) assumes that the President and Congress will agree on whether troops should be used
(B) provides a clear-cut division of authority between the President and Congress in the decision to use troops
(C) assigns a greater role to the Congress than to the President in deciding whether troops should be used
(D) grants final authority to the President to decide whether to use troops
(E) intends that both the President and Congress should be involved in the decision to use troops
>>the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a statute designed to ensure that the collective judgment of both Congress and the President would be applied to the involvement of United States troops in foreign conflicts.

3.The passage suggests that each of the following contributed to Congress’s enacting the War Powers Resolution of 1973 EXCEPT
(A) a change in the attitude in Congress toward exercising its role in the use of armed forces
(B) the failure of Presidents to uphold commitments specified in defense treaties
>>Correct

(C) Congress’s desire to be consulted concerning United States military actions instigated by the President
(D) the amount of money spent on recent conflicts waged without a declaration of war
(E) the number of lives lost in Vietnam

4.It can be inferred from the passage that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is applicable only in “the absence of a declaration of war” (lines 48-49) because
(A) Congress has enacted other laws that already set out presidential requirements for situations in which war has been declared
(B) by virtue of declaring war, Congress already implicitly participates in the decision to deploy troops
>> The Constitution gives Congress the basic power to declare war, as well as the authority to raise and ...

(C) the President generally receives broad public support during wars that have been formally declared by Congress
(D) Congress felt that the President should be allowed unlimited discretion in cases in which war has been declared
(E) the United States Constitution already explicitly defines the reporting and consulting requirements of the President in cases in which war has been declared

5.In can be inferred from the passage that the author believes that the War Powers Resolution of 1973
(A) is not in accord with the explicit roles of the President and Congress as defined in the Constitution
(B) interferes with the role of the President as commander in chief of the armed forces
(C) signals Congress’s commitment to fulfill a role intended for it by the Constitution
In its final section, by declaring the resolution is not intended to alter the constitutional authority of either Congress or the President, the resolution asserts that congressional involvement in decisions to use armed force is in accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution

(D) fails explicitly to address the use of armed forces in the absence of a declaration of war
(E) confirms the role historically assumed by Presidents

6.It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding the invasion of Cambodia?
(A) Because it was undertaken without the consent of Congress, it violated the intent and spirit of the Constitution.
(B) Because it galvanized support for the War Powers Resolution, it contributed indirectly to the expansion of presidential authority.
(C) Because it was necessitated by a defense treaty, it required the consent of Congress.
(D) It served as a precedent for a new interpretation of the constitutional limits on the President’s authority to deploy troops.
(E) It differed from the actions of past Presidents in deploying United States troops in conflicts without a declaration of war by Congress.

7.According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to
(A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war
(B) consult with the leaders of both house of Congress before deploying armed forces
(C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress
(D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces
The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces have actually been deployed.
(E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is declared
Manager
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Posts: 73
GMAT 1: 700 Q51 V34
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 24 Jul 2017, 18:41
The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the extent of the President’s authority
to involve United States troops in conflicts with other nations in the absence of a declaration of war.
Instead, the question of the President’s authority in this matter falls in the hazy area of concurrent power,
where authority is not expressly allocated to either the President or the Congress. The Constitution gives
Congress the basic power to declare war, as well as the authority to raise and support armies and a navy,
enact regulations for the control of the military, and provide for the common defense. The President, on
the other hand, in addition to being obligated to execute the laws of the land, including commitments
negotiated by defense treaties, is named commander in chief of the armed forces and is empowered to
appoint envoys and make treaties with the consent of the Senate. Although this allocation of powers does
not expressly address the use of armed forces short of a declared war, the spirit of the Constitution at
least requires that Congress should be involved in the decision to deploy troops, and in passing the War
Powers Resolution of 1973, Congress has at last reclaimed a role in such decisions.

Historically, United States Presidents have not waited for the approval of Congress before involving
United States troops in conflicts in which a state of war was not declared. One scholar has identified 199
military engagements that occurred without the consent of Congress, ranging from Jefferson’s conflict
with the Barbary pirates to Nixon’s invasion of Cambodia during the Vietnam conflict, which President
Nixon argued was justified because his role as commander in chief allowed him almost unlimited
discretion over the deployment of troops. However, the Vietnam conflict, never a declared war,
represented a turning point in Congress’s tolerance of presidential discretion in the deployment of troops
in undeclared wars. Galvanized by the human and monetary cost of those hostilities and showing a new
determination to fulfill its proper role, Congress enacted the War Powers Resolution of 1973, a statute
designed to ensure that the collective judgment of both Congress and the President would be applied to
the involvement of United States troops in foreign conflicts.

The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with
Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours
after the forces have actually been deployed. Most important, the resolution allows Congress to veto the
involvement once it begins, and requires the President, in most cases, to end the involvement within 60
days unless Congress specifically authorizes the military operation to continue. In its final section, by
declaring the resolution is not intended to alter the constitutional authority of either Congress or the
President, the resolution asserts that congressional involvement in decisions to use armed force is in
accord with the intent and spirit of the Constitution.

Question 1) In the passage, the author is primarily concerned with
(A) showing how the Vietnam conflict led to a new interpretation of the Constitution’s
provisions for use of the military
(B) arguing that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is an attempt to reclaim a share of
constitutionally concurrent power that had been usurped by the President
(C) outlining the history of the struggle between the President and Congress for control of
the military
(D) providing examples of conflicts inherent in the Constitution’s approach to a balance of
powers
(E) explaining how the War Powers Resolution of 1973 alters the Constitution to eliminate
an overlap of authority

Ques 2) . With regard to the use of United States troops in a foreign conflict without a formal
declaration of war by the United States, the author believes that the United States
Constitution does which one of the following?

(A) assumes that the President and Congress will agree on whether troops should be used
(B) provides a clear-cut division of authority between the President and Congress in the
decision to use troops
(C) assigns a greater role to the Congress than to the President in deciding whether troops
should be used
(D) grants final authority to the President to decide whether to use troops
(E) intends (SIGNIFY, MEAN) that both the President and Congress should be involved in
the decision to use troops

Quest 3). The passage suggests that each of the following contributed to Congress’s enacting the War
Powers Resolution of 1973 EXCEPT

(A) a change in the attitude in Congress toward exercising its role in the use of armed forces
(B) the failure of Presidents to uphold commitments specified in defense treaties
(C) Congress’s desire to be consulted concerning United States military actions instigated by
the President
(D) the amount of money spent on recent conflicts waged without a declaration of war
(E) the number of lives lost in Vietnam

Ques 4) . It can be inferred from the passage that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is applicable
only in “the absence of a declaration of war” (lines 48-49) because

(A) Congress has enacted other laws that already set out presidential requirements for
situations in which war has been declared
(B) by virtue of declaring war, Congress already implicitly participates in the decision to
deploy troops
(C) the President generally receives broad public support during wars that have been
formally declared by Congress
(D) Congress felt that the President should be allowed unlimited discretion in cases in which
war has been declared
(E) the United States Constitution already explicitly defines the reporting and consulting
requirements of the President in cases in which war has been declared

Ques 5) . In can be inferred from the passage that the author believes that the War Powers Resolution
of 1973

(A) is not in accord with the explicit roles of the President and Congress as defined in the
Constitution
(B) interferes with the role of the President as commander in chief of the armed forces
(C) signals Congress’s commitment to fulfill a role intended for it by the Constitution
(D) fails explicitly to address the use of armed forces in the absence of a declaration of war
(E) confirms the role historically assumed by Presidents

Quest 6) . It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which
one of the following statements regarding the invasion of Cambodia?

(A) Because it was undertaken without the consent of Congress, it violated the intent and
spirit of the Constitution.
(B) Because it galvanized support for the War Powers Resolution, it contributed indirectly to
the expansion of presidential authority.
(C) Because it was necessitated by a defense treaty, it required the consent of Congress.
(D) It served as a precedent for a new interpretation of the constitutional limits on the
President’s authority to deploy troops.
(E) It differed from the actions of past Presidents in deploying United States troops in
conflicts without a declaration of war by Congress.

Quest 7) . According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the
passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate
involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to

(A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war
(B) consult with the leaders of both house of Congress before deploying armed forces
(C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress
(D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces
(E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is
declared[/wrapimg]

Originally posted by pulkitaggi on 24 Jul 2017, 09:13.
Last edited by broall on 24 Jul 2017, 18:41, edited 1 time in total.
Merged post. Please search before posting
Intern
Joined: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 6
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Apr 2019, 00:30
1
4. It can be inferred from the passage that the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is applicable only in “the absence of a declaration of war” (lines 48-49) because

Quote:
The resolution required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war, to consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and to report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces have actually been deployed.

From this we can infer that in case of war, the President consults with congress before introducing forces.

(A) Congress has enacted other laws that already set out presidential requirements for situations in which war has been declared. There is no mention of any other laws anywhere in the passage. Hence cannot be inferred.
(B) by virtue of declaring war, Congress already implicitly participates in the decision to deploy troops. This means President consults/has to consult Congress inorder to decide whether troops need to be deployed in case of war. Hence, correct.
(C) the President generally receives broad public support during wars that have been formally declared by Congress. Cannot be inferred.
(D) Congress felt that the President should be allowed unlimited discretion in cases in which war has been declared. Cannot be inferred.
(E) the United States Constitution already explicitly defines the reporting and consulting requirements of the President in cases in which war has been declared. There is no where mentioned in the passage that US Constitution explicitly defines the reporting and consulting requirements of president either in case of or abscence of war. Hence cannot be inferred.

6. It can be inferred from the passage that the author would be most likely to agree with which one of the following statements regarding the invasion of Cambodia?

(A) Because it was undertaken without the consent of Congress, it violated the intent and spirit of the Constitution. We can infer this from the below quoted text.

Quote:
Although this allocation of powers does not expressly address the use of armed forces short of a declared war, the spirit of the Constitution at least requires that Congress should be involved in the decision to deploy troops

(B) Because it galvanized support for the War Powers Resolution, it contributed indirectly to the expansion of presidential authority. The invasion in itself did not galvanize the support for War Powers Resolution but monetary and personal loss did and also invasion of Cambodia did not expand President's authority.

(C) Because it was necessitated by a defense treaty, it required the consent of Congress. It is no where mentioned that Cambodian invasion is necessitated by a defense treaty.

(D) It served as a precedent for a new interpretation of the constitutional limits on the President’s authority to deploy troops. Cambodian invasion aftermath galvanized the already existing thought of limiting President's powers to deploy troops in short of war. It did not act as a precedent.

(E) It differed from the actions of past Presidents in deploying United States troops in conflicts without a declaration of war by Congress. Nothing about past presidents is mentioned.

7. According to the provisions of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 as described in the passage, if the President perceives that an international conflict warrants the immediate involvement of United States armed forces, the President is compelled in every instance to

The War Powers Resolution of 1973 required the President, in the absence of a declaration of war-
1. To consult with Congress “in every possible instance” before introducing forces and
2. To report to Congress within 48 hours after the forces have actually been deployed.

(A) request that Congress consider a formal declaration of war.As per the resolution, the President is required to consult congress before deploying troops not for war declaration.
(B) consult with the leaders of both house of Congress before deploying armed forces. The passage just says 'consult congress' not 'leaders of both house of congress'.
(C) desist from deploying any troops unless expressly approved by Congress. Desist is too strong a word here.
(D) report to Congress within 48 hours of the deployment of armed forces. Verbatim.
(E) withdraw any armed forces deployed in such a conflict within 60 days unless war is declared. Nothing as such is mentioned in the passage.
Re: The Constitution of the United States does not explicitly define the e   [#permalink] 21 Apr 2019, 00:30
Display posts from previous: Sort by