Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
06 Oct 2025, 04:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
The Critical RC Distinction: What the Passage Discusses vs. What It Actually Evaluates
Understanding the Core Mistake
When GMAT test-takers encounter Reading Comprehension questions asking about an author's stance, they often fall into a fundamental trap: confusing what the passage discusses in detail with what the passage actually takes a position on. This error affects approximately 25-30% of test-takers on harder RC questions, making it one of the most common yet preventable mistakes.
A Simple Example
Imagine reading this brief passage:
"Many companies have implemented open office designs, which feature shared workspaces and minimal barriers between employees. However, recent productivity studies show these designs actually decrease employee focus by 15%. This challenges the assumption that open offices improve collaboration."
If asked "What does the passage suggest about open office designs?", many readers incorrectly think: "The passage criticizes the physical features of open offices" because shared workspaces are discussed extensively. But the passage actually describes the physical features neutrally while challenging only the productivity assumptions about those features.
How This Principle Manifests in GMAT RC
GMAT passages frequently present information, theories, or claims, then evaluate specific aspects of them. The trap occurs when:
The passage provides detailed information about topic X (neutral description)
The passage takes a critical stance toward conclusion Y (evaluative position)
Test-takers mistakenly think the passage criticizes X, rather than distinguishing between what's merely described versus what's actually evaluated
This pattern appears across all RC topics - business strategies, scientific theories, historical interpretations, social policies, artistic movements, and more.
The Framework: The "Description vs. Evaluation" Analysis
To avoid this mistake, apply this three-step framework:
Step 1: Identify What's Being Described
What information does the passage present neutrally or factually?
Mark this as "DESCRIPTION" in your notes
Step 2: Identify What's Being Evaluated
What specific claims, conclusions, or interpretations does the passage challenge or support?
Mark this as "EVALUATION" - this is where the passage takes a stance
Step 3: Match Answer Choices to Your Analysis
Does the answer choice address something marked as "DESCRIPTION" or "EVALUATION"?
The passage's actual position will align with items marked "EVALUATION"
Application with a Simple Example
Consider this two-line passage:"Electric vehicles use lithium-ion batteries that require rare earth minerals. Critics who claim these vehicles aren't environmentally beneficial ignore their zero-emission operation."
Applying our framework:
DESCRIPTION: EVs use lithium-ion batteries, need rare earth minerals
EVALUATION: Critics' claim about environmental impact is flawed
Question: "The passage suggests that electric vehicle technology is..."
Wrong answer: "problematic due to battery composition" (this is DESCRIPTION, not evaluated)
Right answer: "more environmentally sound than critics acknowledge" (this is the EVALUATION)
Practice Exercise: Complex Example
Read this four-line passage:"Modern museums display artifacts behind protective glass barriers and maintain controlled temperature environments. Traditional curators have long argued this approach preserves historical items for future generations. However, visitor engagement studies show that physical barriers significantly reduce learning effectiveness. This suggests museums should reconsider their preservation priorities."
Question: The passage indicates that museum preservation practices are:
A) Ineffective at maintaining proper environmental conditions
B) Correctly designed for artifact protection but potentially counterproductive for education
C) Unnecessarily expensive given modern technology
D) Based on outdated understanding of visitor behavior
Analysis:
DESCRIPTION: Glass barriers, controlled temperature (factual information)
EVALUATION: The approach may conflict with educational goals (passage's critical stance)
Answer: B - The passage describes preservation methods neutrally but evaluates their educational impact critically.
Find the complete official RC passage and detailed explanation of each question on Neuron.
TakeAway
This mistake pattern reveals a fundamental reading comprehension challenge: distinguishing between informational content and authorial stance. Many test-takers read passages as uniform blocks of information, missing that authors strategically present some content neutrally while taking positions on other aspects.
Success requires developing what experts call "stance detection" - the ability to identify exactly where and how an author is positioning themselves relative to the information they present. When you encounter any RC question about the passage's view or suggestion, immediately ask yourself: "What is the author actually taking a position on, as opposed to simply describing?" This distinction-making skill is crucial across all GMAT Reading Comprehension question types.
Understanding the Core Mistake
When GMAT test-takers encounter Reading Comprehension questions asking about an author's stance, they often fall into a fundamental trap: confusing what the passage discusses in detail with what the passage actually takes a position on. This error affects approximately 25-30% of test-takers on harder RC questions, making it one of the most common yet preventable mistakes.
A Simple Example
Imagine reading this brief passage:
"Many companies have implemented open office designs, which feature shared workspaces and minimal barriers between employees. However, recent productivity studies show these designs actually decrease employee focus by 15%. This challenges the assumption that open offices improve collaboration."
If asked "What does the passage suggest about open office designs?", many readers incorrectly think: "The passage criticizes the physical features of open offices" because shared workspaces are discussed extensively. But the passage actually describes the physical features neutrally while challenging only the productivity assumptions about those features.
How This Principle Manifests in GMAT RC
GMAT passages frequently present information, theories, or claims, then evaluate specific aspects of them. The trap occurs when:
The passage provides detailed information about topic X (neutral description)
The passage takes a critical stance toward conclusion Y (evaluative position)
Test-takers mistakenly think the passage criticizes X, rather than distinguishing between what's merely described versus what's actually evaluated
This pattern appears across all RC topics - business strategies, scientific theories, historical interpretations, social policies, artistic movements, and more.
The Framework: The "Description vs. Evaluation" Analysis
To avoid this mistake, apply this three-step framework:
Step 1: Identify What's Being Described
What information does the passage present neutrally or factually?
Mark this as "DESCRIPTION" in your notes
Step 2: Identify What's Being Evaluated
What specific claims, conclusions, or interpretations does the passage challenge or support?
Mark this as "EVALUATION" - this is where the passage takes a stance
Step 3: Match Answer Choices to Your Analysis
Does the answer choice address something marked as "DESCRIPTION" or "EVALUATION"?
The passage's actual position will align with items marked "EVALUATION"
Application with a Simple Example
Consider this two-line passage:"Electric vehicles use lithium-ion batteries that require rare earth minerals. Critics who claim these vehicles aren't environmentally beneficial ignore their zero-emission operation."
Applying our framework:
DESCRIPTION: EVs use lithium-ion batteries, need rare earth minerals
EVALUATION: Critics' claim about environmental impact is flawed
Question: "The passage suggests that electric vehicle technology is..."
Wrong answer: "problematic due to battery composition" (this is DESCRIPTION, not evaluated)
Right answer: "more environmentally sound than critics acknowledge" (this is the EVALUATION)
Practice Exercise: Complex Example
Read this four-line passage:"Modern museums display artifacts behind protective glass barriers and maintain controlled temperature environments. Traditional curators have long argued this approach preserves historical items for future generations. However, visitor engagement studies show that physical barriers significantly reduce learning effectiveness. This suggests museums should reconsider their preservation priorities."
Question: The passage indicates that museum preservation practices are:
A) Ineffective at maintaining proper environmental conditions
B) Correctly designed for artifact protection but potentially counterproductive for education
C) Unnecessarily expensive given modern technology
D) Based on outdated understanding of visitor behavior
Analysis:
DESCRIPTION: Glass barriers, controlled temperature (factual information)
EVALUATION: The approach may conflict with educational goals (passage's critical stance)
Answer: B - The passage describes preservation methods neutrally but evaluates their educational impact critically.
Find the complete official RC passage and detailed explanation of each question on Neuron.
TakeAway
This mistake pattern reveals a fundamental reading comprehension challenge: distinguishing between informational content and authorial stance. Many test-takers read passages as uniform blocks of information, missing that authors strategically present some content neutrally while taking positions on other aspects.
Success requires developing what experts call "stance detection" - the ability to identify exactly where and how an author is positioning themselves relative to the information they present. When you encounter any RC question about the passage's view or suggestion, immediately ask yourself: "What is the author actually taking a position on, as opposed to simply describing?" This distinction-making skill is crucial across all GMAT Reading Comprehension question types.
Moderators:
189 posts
