The date of the Rimienti World Map, drawn in Italy, is unknown. The map accurately depicts the coastline of western Africa down to the Cape of Good Hope, near Africa's southern tip. In 1488 Portuguese explorers became the first Europeans to reach the Cape. Since it would have taken at least a year for their information to be brought back to Europe and incorporated into maps, the Rimienti World Map could not have been made before 1489.The conclusion of the argument is the following:
the Rimienti World Map could not have been made before 1489The argument supports the conclusion with the following premises:
the map accurately depicts the coastline of western Africa down to the Cape of Good Hope, near Africa's southern tip
In 1488 Portuguese explorers became the first Europeans to reach the Cape
it would have taken at least a year for their information to be brought back to Europe and incorporated into mapsWe see that the reasoning of the argument is that, since the first Europeans to reach the Cape reached it in 1488 and since it would have taken a year for those Europeans to bring the information back to someone who could have used to to make a map, the Rimienti World Map must not have been made for at least a year after 1488.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?The correct answer will state something that must be true in order for the premises to effectively support the conclusion.
(A) Portuguese authorities generally tried to keep information about Portuguese voyages secret for as long as possible.The argument works even if this statement is not true.
After all, even if the Portugese authorities did NOT try to keep information about Portuguese voyages secret for as long as possible, it would still have taken a year for the information about the voyage to the Cape to get to a mapmaker in Europe.
Eliminate.
(B) A map as complicated as the Rimienti World Map would have required at least half a year for a professional cartographer of the 1400's to complete.The premises are that the Portugese explorers reached the Cape of Good Hope in 1488 and that it would have taken at least a year for their information about the Cape to be brought back to Europe and incorporated into maps.
A year after some time in 1488 is some time in 1489. So, even if it would not have taken a half a year for the map to be completed, it still could not have been made before 1489.
So, the argument works even if this choice is not true.
Eliminate.
(C) It would not have taken more than a year for geographical information to travel from Portugal to Italy.This choice is a little tricky because we could get the impression that the conclusion of the argument is that the Rimienti World Map must have been made IN 1489.
If that were the conclusion, then the author would have to assume what this choice says. After all, if it COULD have taken more than a year for the information to travel from Portugal to Italy, then that conclusion would not be correct, since the Cape was first reached by Europeans in 1488 and it would have taken a year for information from that voyage to get back to Europe. So, if it could have taken an additional year for the infromation to get to Italy, then the map might not have been made in 1489. In that case, the conclusion that the map must have been made in 1489 would be incorrect.
However, that is not the conclusion. The conclusion is that the map "could not have been made BEFORE 1489." It's not necessary for this choice to be true for the premises to support that conclusion. After all, that conclusion allows for the possibility that the map was made after 1489. In other words, the conclusion that the map "could not have been made before 1489" would still be true even if the map was not made for more than a year after the information was brought back to Portugal.
Eliminate.
(D) Italian cartographers did not get the information for the Rimienti World Map directly from African sources.The reasoning of the argument is basically that, since the Portugese explorers could not have gotten information about the Cape of Good Hope to an Italian mapmaker before 1489, the Rimienti map could not have been made before 1489.
That reasoning has a big gap in it. It jumps from the idea that the Portugese could not have brought back the information before 1489 to the conclusion that the map was not made before 1489. We see that the argument basically equates the time when the Portugese could have provided the information with the time the map could have been made.
Thus, the argument is based on the assumption that the only way an Italian mapmaker could have gotten information about the Cape of Good Hope is by getting it from those Portugese explorers. After all, if the mapmaker could have gotten the information in another way, then the mapmaker might have had the information before 1489 and could have made the map then.
Thus, we can see that the argument depends on the assumption that Italian cartographers (mapmakers) did not get the information from African sources, or anyone else other than the Portugese explorers.
So, the argument depends on this choice being true.
Keep.
(E) No accurate map of any parts of the coastline of western Africa appeared before the Rimienti World Map.This choice does not have to be true for the argument to work.
After all, the argument is based on facts about the first Europeans to reach the Cape of Good Hope. Those facts would still support the conclusion about the Rimienti World Map even if some maps accurately depicted other parts of the coastline of western Africa.
In other words, it doesn't have to be the case that European mapmakers knew nothing about the entire coast of western Africa for it to be the case that this particular map, which depicts a particular part of Africa, the Cape of Good Hope, could not have have been made before 1489.
Eliminate.
Correct answer: D