Ruby2021
Hi could someone please explain Q2 & Q3? Thanks.
Since its not been answered yet, I'll take a shot at it.
2. The passage suggests which of the following about surges in the Earth’s outer core?
Think it really boils down to A and C for me. So ill address just those.
(A) They occur cyclically every few decades.
What occurs every few decades? The line towards the end reads "magnetic tempests develop over decades and persist for centuries." The magnetic tempest may reform from a surge in the outer core say, ~500 years later - and this does not mean a surge every few decades, especially cyclically.
(C) They are detected through indirect means.
Can you detect a surge in the outer core through a change in magnetic field? The passage states "When surges in the molten iron occur, magnetic tempests are created. At the Earth’s surface, these tempests can be detected by changes in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field." Detecting the magnetic field does in fact, qualify as an "indirect way" to detect a surge in the outer core since you're not
directly measuring the surge through some instrument.
3. It can be inferred from the passage that geophysicists seeking to explain magnetic tempests ought to conduct research on the Earth’s outer core because the Earth’s outer core
This is an inference question - so we cannot hope to find it directly stated in the passage. Here we need to find a convincing reason to understand why the outer core in specific is studied to explain the occurrence of magnetic tempests. Here it boils down to C and D - so I will address those 2 options.
Note: this is a good trap if you've really understood the passage well. But again, if you go through the process of elimination, you will most likely not pick this. Just mentioning this because if you don't read the next option, you may end up picking this.
It's been mentioned "Fortunately scientists have been recording changes in the Earth’s magnetic field for more than 300 years." The magnetic fields do occur in the outer core. So yeah, this is a good reason IMO - you continue to study the outer core because it has been recorded for 3 centuries, and we've been told that its a process that needs to be studied over an extremely long period of time (multiple centuries).
(D) is involved in generating the Earth’s magnetic field
This option is a no-brainer and is ultimately correct. It's been stated that the outer core has the presence of the magnetic tempests and hence, is the primary reason for studying it. Without this reason, there is no need to study the outer core to understand the magnetic tempests.