jabhatta2 wrote:
Hi
AndrewN - i eliminated D because i thought the comparison marker "Like" should compare Noun to Noun only and not clause to clause.
Insn't there a clause to the left of "LIKE" in option D, given the word "was" ?
option D)
The earthquake that caused most of Port Royal to sink into the Caribbean was,
in its effects, like the eruption
that buried ancient PompeiiOption D seems to be comparing how the earthquake
was to the eruption ?
Hence i eliminated D.
Analogy of option D
The 2000 Tsunami WAS like the 1990 Tsunami = I thought this would be wrong as you are comparing a clause (The 2000 Tsunami WAS) to a noun (1990 Tsunami)
Hello,
jabhatta2. I think you are applying the
clause label a little loosely. Sure,
The earthquake was begins a clause, but it could not stand on its own to make a sentence:
was is an intransitive verb. You need a
what, some form of noun, to complete the predicate. The predicate in this sentence happens to be the second element in the comparison, one that involves two nouns:
The earthquake was like the eruption. Furthermore, the two embedded clauses immediately follow the nouns they modify—
The earthquake that... and
the eruption that...—and you know how the GMAT™ likes parallelism.
The takeaway? Do not be too quick to write off an answer choice. There may be more to the picture than meets the eye. I hope that helps resolve your concerns. Thank you for thinking to ask me.
- Andrew