GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 15 Oct 2018, 12:18

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 May 2016, 23:54
sa18 wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
sriamlan wrote:
Can any expert reply on this ? Not sure how C is the right answer


The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports.

A) the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
B) the United States and nearly double what the Japanese exports were
C) the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did
D) what the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
E) what the United States exported and nearly double the Japanese exports

The comparison structure here is "X 60%more than/ twice as much as Y " - Y in turn is comprised of a parrallel structure "P and Q"

Hence the overall structure is " X 60% more than P and twice as much as Q"

X = European Economy exported
P = United States exported
Q = the Japaneses did (exported).

Moreover,
The comparison between X and P is: 60% more than
The comparison between X and Q is:nearly twice as much as (= 200% of = 100% more than)

In the correct option C, the above parallelism is maintained properly:

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did.


Option A: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option B: P (United States) is not parallel to X. Q is also wrong since it uses "were" rather than "exported" or "did".
Option D: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option E: The element Q (Japanese exports) is not parallel to X and P.


Hi

Is it right, at the first place, to compare a union , The United States and Japanese?


I get your point. Ideally, the correct answer should have been " ...Japan did." Nonetheless in absence of such an option we must select the best of the 5 given, i.e. C.
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 03 Jul 2015
Posts: 48
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 May 2016, 22:31
sayantanc2k wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
sriamlan wrote:
Can any expert reply on this ? Not sure how C is the right answer


The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports.

A) the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
B) the United States and nearly double what the Japanese exports were
C) the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did
D) what the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
E) what the United States exported and nearly double the Japanese exports

The comparison structure here is "X 60%more than/ twice as much as Y " - Y in turn is comprised of a parrallel structure "P and Q"

Hence the overall structure is " X 60% more than P and twice as much as Q"

X = European Economy exported
P = United States exported
Q = the Japaneses did (exported).

Moreover,
The comparison between X and P is: 60% more than
The comparison between X and Q is:nearly twice as much as (= 200% of = 100% more than)

In the correct option C, the above parallelism is maintained properly:

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did.


Option A: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option B: P (United States) is not parallel to X. Q is also wrong since it uses "were" rather than "exported" or "did".
Option D: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option E: The element Q (Japanese exports) is not parallel to X and P.


Hi

Is it right, at the first place, to compare a union , The United States and Japanese?

I get your point. Ideally, the correct answer should have been " ...Japan did." Nonetheless in absence of such an option we must select the best of the 5 given, i.e. C.


Thank you for the reply.
Can you also tell why D is incorrect?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 May 2016, 16:56
sa18 wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports.

A) the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
B) the United States and nearly double what the Japanese exports were
C) the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did
D) what the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
E) what the United States exported and nearly double the Japanese exports

The comparison structure here is "X 60%more than/ twice as much as Y " - Y in turn is comprised of a parrallel structure "P and Q"

Hence the overall structure is " X 60% more than P and twice as much as Q"

X = European Economy exported
P = United States exported
Q = the Japaneses did (exported).

Moreover,
The comparison between X and P is: 60% more than
The comparison between X and Q is:nearly twice as much as (= 200% of = 100% more than)

In the correct option C, the above parallelism is maintained properly:

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did.


Option A: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option B: P (United States) is not parallel to X. Q is also wrong since it uses "were" rather than "exported" or "did".
Option D: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option E: The element Q (Japanese exports) is not parallel to X and P.


Hi

Is it right, at the first place, to compare a union , The United States and Japanese?

I get your point. Ideally, the correct answer should have been " ...Japan did." Nonetheless in absence of such an option we must select the best of the 5 given, i.e. C.


Thank you for the reply.
Can you also tell why D is incorrect?


I already tried to explained above why the comparison is wrong in D as well - I would repeat the same:

The three elements in comparison in option D are:

1. European Economy exported
2. United States did (exported)
3. Japan's exports.

The third element is structurally not parallel to the first and the second. The correct structure for the 3rd element should have been:
3. Japan did (exported)
Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 525
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Premium Member
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Dec 2016, 04:47
By virtue of omission, in C --> nearly twice as much as the Japanese did {exported}?

Doesn't this sound incorrect? Shouldn't it be did export and since export is not present anywhere in the sentence, shouldn't we ideally repeat it?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2016, 21:18
warriorguy wrote:
By virtue of omission, in C --> nearly twice as much as the Japanese did {exported}?

Doesn't this sound incorrect? Shouldn't it be did export and since export is not present anywhere in the sentence, shouldn't we ideally repeat it?


It is not omission; it is replacement - "exported" is replaced by "did". It is a common practice to REPLACE the verb in the second element of a parallelism structure with the verb "to do" .
Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 525
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Premium Member
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Dec 2016, 21:25
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
By virtue of omission, in C --> nearly twice as much as the Japanese did {exported}?

Doesn't this sound incorrect? Shouldn't it be did export and since export is not present anywhere in the sentence, shouldn't we ideally repeat it?


It is not omission; it is replacement - "exported" is replaced by "did". It is a common practice to REPLACE the verb in the second element of a parallelism structure with the verb "to do" .



I understand that part. But if I remember (correctly), one of your post, you mentioned that the verb should be present in the earlier part of the sentence in the same form as intended in the second part else repeat?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2016, 04:45
warriorguy wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:
warriorguy wrote:
By virtue of omission, in C --> nearly twice as much as the Japanese did {exported}?

Doesn't this sound incorrect? Shouldn't it be did export and since export is not present anywhere in the sentence, shouldn't we ideally repeat it?


It is not omission; it is replacement - "exported" is replaced by "did". It is a common practice to REPLACE the verb in the second element of a parallelism structure with the verb "to do" .



I understand that part. But if I remember (correctly), one of your post, you mentioned that the verb should be present in the earlier part of the sentence in the same form as intended in the second part else repeat?


Yes, you are absolutely right. In this example, if the second verb were "has"/"have" ("...as the Japanese have"), then the point you have mentioned would be applicable (this would then be a case of omission) - since there is no past participle ("exported") form in the first part of the sentence, using "have" would be wrong.

However the simple past "exported" can be replaced with "did". (This is not a case of omission.)
Retired Moderator
avatar
P
Joined: 04 Aug 2016
Posts: 525
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
Premium Member
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2016, 09:33
sayantanc2k wrote:

Yes, you are absolutely right. In this example, if the second verb were "has"/"have" ("...as the Japanese have"), then the point you have mentioned would be applicable (this would then be a case of omission) - since there is no past participle ("exported") form in the first part of the sentence, using "have" would be wrong.

However the simple past "exported" can be replaced with "did". (This is not a case of omission.)



So if I understood correctly, it is part of the concept wherein if we have the verb without any auxiliary verb in the first part of the sentence, we need not re-write the verb in the second part but just replace it with either do,did or does; however, if the verb in the first part has an auxiliary verb + verb construction then just repeat the auxiliary verb in second part of the sentence?
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3036
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2016, 07:15
warriorguy wrote:
sayantanc2k wrote:

Yes, you are absolutely right. In this example, if the second verb were "has"/"have" ("...as the Japanese have"), then the point you have mentioned would be applicable (this would then be a case of omission) - since there is no past participle ("exported") form in the first part of the sentence, using "have" would be wrong.

However the simple past "exported" can be replaced with "did". (This is not a case of omission.)



So if I understood correctly, it is part of the concept wherein if we have the verb without any auxiliary verb in the first part of the sentence, we need not re-write the verb in the second part but just replace it with either do,did or does; however, if the verb in the first part has an auxiliary verb + verb construction then just repeat the auxiliary verb in second part of the sentence?


Yes, you are right - you have described the generalization very well.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Aug 2015
Posts: 76
Location: India
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.39
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Dec 2016, 10:04
The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports.

'and' is the parallel marker here.

A) the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
The two components - United States did and Japan's export - are not parallel.
B) the United States and nearly double what the Japanese exports were
Similarly, components are not parallel.
C) the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did
Keep it on hold.
D) what the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
Parallelism violated.
E) what the United States exported and nearly double the Japanese exports
Parallelism violated.

Thus, I chose option C.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 20 Jun 2017
Posts: 87
GMAT 1: 570 Q49 V19
CAT Tests
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2018, 11:00
Quote:
The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports.

A) the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
B) the United States and nearly double what the Japanese exports were
C) the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did
D) what the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
E) what the United States exported and nearly double the Japanese exports


We are comparing the action of exporting for the 3 groups.

A - compares the action of exporting of the first 2 groups with Japan's exports i.e. compares 2 actions with a noun - INCORRECT

B - compares the action of exporting with a country - INCORRECT
D - what not required. Other reason same as A. - INCORRECT
E - same as A. - INCORRECT
C - proper comparison of the 3 actions - CORRECT
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 427
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Sep 2018, 04:57
focus on finding 2 elements(which can be nouns or verbs or 2 contexts-presented by prepositinal phrase, which are compared to make comparison problem much easier.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 286
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Oct 2018, 21:21
sayantanc2k wrote:
sriamlan wrote:
Can any expert reply on this ? Not sure how C is the right answer


The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports.

A) the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
B) the United States and nearly double what the Japanese exports were
C) the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did
D) what the United States did and nearly twice as much as Japan's exports
E) what the United States exported and nearly double the Japanese exports

The comparison structure here is "X 60%more than/ twice as much as Y " - Y in turn is comprised of a parrallel structure "P and Q"

Hence the overall structure is " X 60% more than P and twice as much as Q"

X = European Economy exported
P = United States exported
Q = the Japaneses did (exported).

Moreover,
The comparison between X and P is: 60% more than
The comparison between X and Q is:nearly twice as much as (= 200% of = 100% more than)

In the correct option C, the above parallelism is maintained properly:

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in goods in 1988, sixty percent more than the United States exported and nearly twice as much as the Japanese did.


Option A: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option B: P (United States) is not parallel to X. Q is also wrong since it uses "were" rather than "exported" or "did".
Option D: The element Q (Japan's exports) is not parallel to X and P.
Option E: The element Q (Japanese exports) is not parallel to X and P.



Can you please clear my doubt-

What if the intended meaning was to compare E's 400$ exports with J's exports? And the verb exported with US's action?

I mean aren't we trying a forced parallelism?

Posted from my mobile device
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in &nbs [#permalink] 12 Oct 2018, 21:21

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 33 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

The European Economic Community exported just under $400 billion in

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.