Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
0%
(00:00)
correct 100%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The excuse for not voting that is most commonly given by citizens is that the two major political parties do not offer competent candidates or meaningful policies and positions. The nonvoting citizen believes that by expressing dissatisfaction as a consumer in the political process by not casting his or her ballot, the parties will put forward better candidates and positions. But this misconceives the role of voter as that of consumer. In the marketplace, defection to another product or failure to purchase a product sends a powerful message that results in change, improvement, and innovation. But not voting in the political process will not produce a smorgasbord, but rather, will result in a menu with a single entree and two side dishes.
1- The author does NOT address which of the following?
A) the results from people not participating in the electoral process
B) consequences of a consumer's refusal to purchase a product
C) how citizens can effectively express dissatisfaction with the two major political parties
D) why many citizens refuse to vote
E) differences between the role of the voter and that of the consumer
2- The author attempts to make her point by
A) constructing a simile
B) discrediting an analogy
C) making a circular argument
D) offering a unique hypothesis
E) presenting new evidence
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
1- The author does NOT address which of the following? A) the results from people not participating in the electoral process B) consequences of a consumer's refusal to purchase a product C) how citizens can effectively express dissatisfaction with the two major political parties D) why many citizens refuse to vote E) differences between the role of the voter and that of the consumer
Show more
C.
Quote:
2- The author attempts to make her point by A) constructing a simile B) discrediting an analogy C) making a circular argument D) offering a unique hypothesis E) presenting new evidence
Show more
A seems good. camparing a consumer to a voter.
author tells an analogy but don't discredit it (I guess)..not B
anyway, I liked the word smorgasbord. Scandinavian huh!!
The answer for the first One is "C" and for the second one , I'd choose "B" 'cos the author presents an analogy of sorts to indicate that the consumer gets what she wants but not the voter.
By doing this, the author tries to discredit the analogy.
IMO
E (C, is mentioned in the passage, Voter expresses himself against parties by not voting, while (E) I think is not clearly mentioned in the passage)
A
1- C (There is no mention of "effective" expression of dissatisfaction in the argument)
2- B (Here, the comparison is discredited saying saying that it does not work in the realm of voting)
What are the OA's?
Paul
The excuse for not voting that is most commonly given by citizens is that the two major political parties do not offer competent candidates or meaningful policies and positions. The nonvoting citizen believes that by expressing dissatisfaction as a consumer in the political process by not casting his or her ballot, the parties will put forward better candidates and positions. But this misconceives the role of voter as that of consumer. In the marketplace, defection to another product or failure to purchase a product sends a powerful message that results in change, improvement, and innovation. But not voting in the political process will not produce a smorgasbord, but rather, will result in a menu with a single entree and two side dishes.
1- The author does NOT address which of the following? A) the results from people not participating in the electoral process B) consequences of a consumer's refusal to purchase a product C) how citizens can effectively express dissatisfaction with the two major political parties D) why many citizens refuse to vote E) differences between the role of the voter and that of the consumer
2- The author attempts to make her point by A) constructing a simile B) discrediting an analogy C) making a circular argument D) offering a unique hypothesis E) presenting new evidence
for 1) I see the point! I missed the word "effectively" in option (C), I guess (C) is better, but can one help me out in refuting (E).
2) Ya! after re-reading the passage (B) sounds good.
"But this misconceives the role of voter as that of consumer. In the marketplace, defection to another product or failure to purchase a product sends a powerful message that results in change, improvement, and innovation. But not voting in the political process will not produce a smorgasbord, but rather, will result in a menu with a single entree and two side dishes."
It clearly states that there is misconception of the role of voter as that of consumer. If a customer rejects a product by buying another product or by not buying the defective product, it results in change of the product on the better side. However, if a voter rejects voting, it results in changes on the worse side. If I understand the analogy correctly, it means that we get a government with no clear majority for any party, whcih leads to chaos.
Any other views??
mba
for 1) I see the point! I missed the word "effectively" in option (C), I guess (C) is better, but can one help me out in refuting (E). 2) Ya! after re-reading the passage (B) sounds good. :wall
Show more
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.