It is currently 19 Oct 2017, 04:23

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 01 Aug 2011
Posts: 82

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 29

Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Finance
GPA: 3.4
The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 09:03
7
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

53% (00:52) correct 47% (01:03) wrong based on 245 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

D&E ?
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Kudos [?]: 282 [0], given: 29

Manager
Affiliations: Project Management Professional (PMP)
Joined: 30 Jun 2011
Posts: 198

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Location: New Delhi, India
Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 09:56
Ankit04041987 wrote:
The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

D&E ?

'seriously impact on' is not correct usage.
It should be 'seriously impact industrialized nations'.
Therefore B and C are incorrect.

A has a problem because the sentences uses 'serious impact to'. It should be 'serious impact on'.

Between D and E, the 'possibility of' is the correct usage. Hence E is right.

I believe the best option is 1 below
1) could seriously impact industrialized nations and could severely diminish/impede or
Since we don't have that option 2) works.
2) could have a serious impact on nations and could severely diminish

The usage of have might be confusing but it is the best choice we are left with.
_________________

Best
Vaibhav

If you found my contribution helpful, please click the +1 Kudos button on the left, Thanks

Kudos [?]: 83 [0], given: 12

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4287

Kudos [?]: 7891 [2], given: 363

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

16 Jun 2012, 11:01
2
KUDOS
Between D and E

D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have ---- impede means to obstruct, hinder , block , The meaning is changed – possibility to have is unidiomatic
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having--- diminish means to reduce, the right intent. Possibility of having is idiomatic

So E
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7891 [2], given: 363

Intern
Joined: 30 Jan 2013
Posts: 5

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Schools: ISB '17
Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2015, 08:21
the expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious
impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish
the possibility to have
an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations
and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and
severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and
severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations
and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations
and severely diminish the possibility of having

Solution says that correct answer is E. I would request someone to explain how use of having is justified.

Thanks!

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 41893

Kudos [?]: 128823 [0], given: 12183

Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2015, 08:24
kusha25 wrote:
the expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious
impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish
the possibility to have
an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations
and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and
severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and
severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations
and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations
and severely diminish the possibility of having

Solution says that correct answer is E. I would request someone to explain how use of having is justified.

Thanks!

_________________

Kudos [?]: 128823 [0], given: 12183

Current Student
Joined: 19 Aug 2013
Posts: 32

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 62

Schools: ISB '17 (A)
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V42
GPA: 3
Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2015, 11:02
can someone explain how "have a serious impact" and "severely impede" are parallel?

Kudos [?]: 13 [0], given: 62

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4422

Kudos [?]: 8434 [0], given: 102

Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2015, 15:30
kusha25 wrote:
Solution says that correct answer is E. I would request someone to explain how use of having is justified.

rishabchoraria wrote:
can someone explain how "have a serious impact" and "severely impede" are parallel?

Dear kusha25 & rishabchoraria,
I'm happy to respond. This is an OK question, not really the high quality as a GMAT SC practice question. At least it has one perfectly clear and unambiguous answer.

Here is the question again:
The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations and severely diminish the possibility of having

Choice (D) is wrong because of the idiom mistake at the end. The "possibility to have" is idiomatically incorrect. What we would say in English is the "possibility of having." Also, "diminish the possibility" sounds more natural than "impede the possibility."

Now, rishabchoraria's question betrays a fundamental and very common misunderstanding about parallelism. Two verbs can be in parallel, particularly if they share the same subject, as they do here. Two verbs in parallel simply have to be full verbs, correct in SVA. They don't need to match in any other way. It doesn't matter if one has adverbs and the other doesn't. They don't even have to be the same tense. See:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gram ... rb-tenses/
"have a serious impact" ==> "have" is a full verb
"severely impede" ===> "impede" is a full verb
Right there, we are done. Two full verbs, so the parallelism is legitimate. Students get into all kinds of trouble because they feel they have to overmatch two things in parallel, and that's just not the case.

Here is a set of free GMAT idiom flashcards that you might find helpful:
https://gmat.magoosh.com/flashcards/idioms

Here's a high quality GMAT SC practice question:
http://gmat.magoosh.com/questions/3597

Mike
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Kudos [?]: 8434 [0], given: 102

Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7674

Kudos [?]: 17357 [0], given: 232

Location: Pune, India
Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Jul 2015, 21:06
kusha25 wrote:
the expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious
impact to industrialized nations and severely diminish
the possibility to have
an economy free of inflation.
(A) be a serious impact to industrialized nations
and severely diminish the possibility to have
(B) seriously impact on industrialized nations and
severely impede the possibility to have
(C) seriously impact on industrialized nations and
severely impede the possibility of having
(D) have a serious impact on industrialized nations
and severely impede the possibility to have
(E) have a serious impact on industrialized nations
and severely diminish the possibility of having

Solution says that correct answer is E. I would request someone to explain how use of having is justified.

Thanks!

We look for a noun after "possibility of ..."
e.g. possibility of an earthquake...

The -ing form of the verb can be used as present participle or as a gerund (looks like a verb but functions as a noun)

Here, 'having ...' works as a gerund and hence the sentence is fine.

Note that "impede" means to hinder or obstruct. How can someone impede the possibility of something? One can decrease the possibility (of say, success) by impeding some action.
Possibility can be increased or decreased, not impeded.

Hence, (E) is correct.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Kudos [?]: 17357 [0], given: 232

GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 10118

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious [#permalink]

Show Tags

27 Sep 2017, 06:41
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Kudos [?]: 261 [0], given: 0

Re: The expected rise in the price of oil could be a serious   [#permalink] 27 Sep 2017, 06:41
Display posts from previous: Sort by