Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
20 Feb 2023, 04:31
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
75%
(hard)
Question Stats:
43% (01:51) correct
57%
(02:07)
wrong
based on 179
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The faith in business-led philanthropy propagated by the entrepreneurs and the top executives of profit- making enterprises hides the harsher reality that businesses are uncompromisingly chasing efficiency, relentlessly cutting costs, shifting jobs to cheaper places or opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling some portion of the profits into perks for the employees.
A. cheaper places or opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
B. places that are cheaper and opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycle
C. cheaper places or are opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then also recycling
D. cheaper places, opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
E. places, cheaper, or to opt for employee benefit schemes that are cheaper, and then recycling
A. cheaper places or opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
B. places that are cheaper and opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycle
C. cheaper places or are opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then also recycling
D. cheaper places, opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
E. places, cheaper, or to opt for employee benefit schemes that are cheaper, and then recycling
Sushil117
Joined: 04 Mar 2020
Last visit: 13 Nov 2023
Posts: 248
Given Kudos: 100
Location: India
Schools: Smith Ivey Alberta '23 HEC Montreal Rotman '23
GPA: 3.3
20 Feb 2023, 07:44
Kudos
Bookmarks
A. cheaper places or opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
seems fine . "or " is the only issue but hold on
B. places that are cheaper and opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycle
parallelism error "recycle" should be recycling
C. cheaper places or are opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then also recycling
"and then also", use of also is redundant
D. cheaper places, opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
seems fine hold on
E. places, cheaper, or to opt for employee benefit schemes that are cheaper, and then recycling
parallelism error " or to opt" should be opting
now between A & D ,In A "or" makes it seem that companies are doing things stated previously or just opting for cheaper employee benefits and then recycling , while in D companies doing are doing all the things and then recycling.
IMO D
seems fine . "or " is the only issue but hold on
B. places that are cheaper and opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycle
parallelism error "recycle" should be recycling
C. cheaper places or are opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then also recycling
"and then also", use of also is redundant
D. cheaper places, opting for cheaper employee benefit schemes, and then recycling
seems fine hold on
E. places, cheaper, or to opt for employee benefit schemes that are cheaper, and then recycling
parallelism error " or to opt" should be opting
now between A & D ,In A "or" makes it seem that companies are doing things stated previously or just opting for cheaper employee benefits and then recycling , while in D companies doing are doing all the things and then recycling.
IMO D
18 Apr 2023, 22:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
I did not find much difference between A and D except for:
Whether a company does these two things together or not is immaterial as long as we have the conclusion in sight.
The company recycles a portion of its profits by doing a bunch of things among which one has an alternative course of action (a different possibility but the same conclusion, ultimately).
Giving us a hint that there is no material difference as such between A and D.
Whether a company does these two things together or not is immaterial as long as we have the conclusion in sight.
The company recycles a portion of its profits by doing a bunch of things among which one has an alternative course of action (a different possibility but the same conclusion, ultimately).
Giving us a hint that there is no material difference as such between A and D.
