It is currently 17 Nov 2017, 10:46

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# The financial health of non-profit institutions such as

Author Message
Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France
The financial health of non-profit institutions such as [#permalink]

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 14:27
00:00

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The financial health of non-profit institutions such
as public television depends on large government
grants. Such grants allow funds to be concentrated
so that real benefit can be obtained. Otherwise
money will be diffused and such institutions will
cease to exist.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously
weakens the argument made above that government
grants are necessary for the survival of non-profit
institutions?
(A) Government grants for non-profit institutions
have declined in recent years.
(B) Donations by individuals, added together, are a
major source of investment funds.
(C) Money spent on non-profit institutions is
ultimately returned to the public.
(D) Fund raising efforts are an important source of
revenue for non-profit institutions.
(E) The absence of government regulation
encourages individuals to donate money.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2005
Posts: 398

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 15:38
Will go with D here....

Kudos [?]: 31 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 28 Dec 2005
Posts: 748

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 16:04
Going with C. Argument tries to prove that government
grants are necessary for the survival of non-profit
institutions
.

C shows that this money is eventually returned to the public, which implies that the institutions are self-sufficient.

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2006
Posts: 439

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 22:04
Is it (E).
_________________

http://mba2010dreams.blogspot.com

Kudos [?]: 80 [0], given: 0

Current Student
Joined: 29 Jan 2005
Posts: 5201

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 22:13
karlfurt wrote:
The financial health of non-profit institutions such
as public television depends on large government
grants. Such grants allow funds to be concentrated
so that real benefit can be obtained. Otherwise
money will be diffused and such institutions will
cease to exist.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously
weakens the argument made above that government
grants are necessary for the survival of non-profit
institutions?
(A) Government grants for non-profit institutions
have declined in recent years. --> out of scope, so what?
(B) Donations by individuals, added together, are a
major source of investment funds. ---> investment funds for what?
(C) Money spent on non-profit institutions is
ultimately returned to the public. ---> "180" actually supports the premise. It`s the people who benefit from the free services made available by such NPOs.
(D) Fund raising efforts are an important source of
revenue for non-profit institutions. ---> "important" is very vague. Are we talking about 1% or 75%?
(E) The absence of government regulation
encourages individuals to donate money. ---> Correct! This implies that the private donations are sufficient enough to sustain public broadcasting TV, etc.

My chips are on (E)

1:31

Kudos [?]: 437 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 14 Jul 2006
Posts: 326

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 22:54
Me too for (E).

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 0

SVP
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 1728

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

17 Aug 2006, 23:42
Will go with E.

C looks good as it directly counters what is asked in the question. But IMO C is not addressing the issue.

Take a look at this line.

Such grants allow funds to be concentrated so that real benefit can be obtained. Otherwise money will be diffused and such institutions will
cease to exist.

The job of non-profit institutions is to help the general public. The author claims that grants to non-profit organizations by the goverment helps to concentrate the funds and utilise it better.
But if individuals donate money when nothing is available from goverment, non-profit institutions can still function.

Kudos [?]: 101 [0], given: 0

VP
Joined: 14 May 2006
Posts: 1399

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

18 Aug 2006, 00:02
wow... E for me

MATT shines with his explanations!!!

Kudos [?]: 226 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2006, 04:38
I'm sorry for the late OA. I was absent and forgot this thread.
It might disapoint you as it did for me, but OA is B.
I don't have the OE here but I wasn 't not satisfied with it.
B speaks about investement funds. Funds for what?????
I chose E too.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

CEO
Joined: 20 Nov 2005
Posts: 2892

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 0

Schools: Completed at SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - Class of 2008

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2006, 07:10
karlfurt wrote:
I'm sorry for the late OA. I was absent and forgot this thread.
It might disapoint you as it did for me, but OA is B.
I don't have the OE here but I wasn 't not satisfied with it.
B speaks about investement funds. Funds for what?????
I chose E too.

I can't believe this. What is the source????
_________________

SAID BUSINESS SCHOOL, OXFORD - MBA CLASS OF 2008

Kudos [?]: 334 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2006, 11:20
Source : Lsat intensive review 2001

OE:
(B) Choice (B) directly contradicts the authorâ€™s conclusion. Notice the word
â€œnecessaryâ€

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Manager
Joined: 20 May 2006
Posts: 96

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2006, 11:44
The evidence is that "Such grants allow funds to be concentrated
so that real benefit can be obtained. Otherwise
money will be diffused
and such institutions will
cease to exist."

B goes to the heart of the passage. "Donations by individuals, added together, are a major source of investment funds."

that was my reasoning anyway

Kudos [?]: 1 [0], given: 0

Director
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 577

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Location: France
Re: I think its B. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

22 Aug 2006, 12:22
govinam wrote:
The evidence is that "Such grants allow funds to be concentrated
so that real benefit can be obtained. Otherwise
money will be diffused
and such institutions will
cease to exist."

B goes to the heart of the passage. "Donations by individuals, added together, are a major source of investment funds."

that was my reasoning anyway

nice explanation!
though it doesn't refer to the destination of the funds.

Kudos [?]: 130 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Posts: 325

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: I think its B. [#permalink]

### Show Tags

23 Aug 2006, 02:45
Well I did choose B...

Although when i read all the explanations... I thought I might be wrong but it seems a confusing one...

E cannot be it bcos we duno how much they donate.... might be a paultry amount or might be huge....

Kudos [?]: 11 [0], given: 0

Re: I think its B.   [#permalink] 23 Aug 2006, 02:45
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# The financial health of non-profit institutions such as

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.