Last visit was: 24 Apr 2024, 17:36 It is currently 24 Apr 2024, 17:36

Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 92900
Own Kudos [?]: 618815 [3]
Given Kudos: 81588
Send PM
Current Student
Joined: 06 Mar 2020
Posts: 110
Own Kudos [?]: 137 [1]
Given Kudos: 33
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
Schools: CBS (M)
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
Send PM
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Posts: 368
Own Kudos [?]: 706 [1]
Given Kudos: 67
Location: Switzerland
Concentration: General Management
GPA: 3.9
Send PM
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2017
Posts: 98
Own Kudos [?]: 47 [0]
Given Kudos: 214
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V29
Send PM
Re: The foreign minister of Zeria announced today that her country was sev [#permalink]
auradediligodo wrote:
The foreign minister of Zeria announced today that her country was severing diplomatic relations with Nandalo because of Nandalo’s flagrant violations of human rights. But Zeria continues to maintain diplomatic relations with many countries that the minister knows to have far worse human-rights records than Nandalo does. Therefore, despite the foreign minister’s claim, this latest diplomatic move cannot be explained exclusively by Zeria’s commitment to upholding human rights.

The argumentative structure of which one of the following most closely parallels that of the argument in the passage?



Pre-thinking

We need to find a similar scenario here.
What the argument tries to say is that an action (severing diplomatic relations with a specific country) cannot be explained by a particular reason (infringements of human rights by that country) because there are more meaningful reasons for pursuing the same action on other grounds (pursuing more severe relations with the other countries). Hence there must be another reason for the action taken.

Looking at the answer choices we see a parallel in choice D because the reason given (socializing is bad) could be applied in other situations (movie night with colleague)



(A) Henry’s parents insist that he eat breakfast before leaving for school because not doing so would be bad for his health. But his parents themselves almost never eat breakfast, so their insistence cannot be completely explained by their concern for his health.

(B) Professor Walsh says that only typed term papers will be accepted because most handwriting is difficult to read. But since she lectures from handwritten notes, her policy cannot be exclusively explained by any difficulty she has with handwritten material.

(C) James claims that he stole only because he was hungry. But although hunger could account for stealing if food could not be readily obtained in any other way, in this case food was otherwise readily available, and so James theft cannot be completely explained by his hunger.

(D) Armand declined Helen’s invitation to dinner on the grounds that socializing with coworkers is imprudent. But since Armand went to a movie with another coworker, Maria, that same evening, his expressed concern for prudence cannot fully explain his refusal.

(E) It is often asserted that there are fewer good teachers than there used to be because teachers’ salaries have reached a new low. But teachers have always been poorly paid, so low salaries cannot fully explain this perceived decline in the effectiveness of teachers.


Kindly explain why not A is applicable.?
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
Joined: 11 Mar 2018
Posts: 264
Own Kudos [?]: 346 [0]
Given Kudos: 271
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37 (Online)
Send PM
The foreign minister of Zeria announced today that her country was sev [#permalink]
robu1 wrote:
auradediligodo wrote:
The foreign minister of Zeria announced today that her country was severing diplomatic relations with Nandalo because of Nandalo’s flagrant violations of human rights. But Zeria continues to maintain diplomatic relations with many countries that the minister knows to have far worse human-rights records than Nandalo does. Therefore, despite the foreign minister’s claim, this latest diplomatic move cannot be explained exclusively by Zeria’s commitment to upholding human rights.

The argumentative structure of which one of the following most closely parallels that of the argument in the passage?

(A) Henry’s parents insist that he eat breakfast before leaving for school because not doing so would be bad for his health. But his parents themselves almost never eat breakfast, so their insistence cannot be completely explained by their concern for his health.

(D) Armand declined Helen’s invitation to dinner on the grounds that socializing with coworkers is imprudent. But since Armand went to a movie with another coworker, Maria, that same evening, his expressed concern for prudence cannot fully explain his refusal.


Kindly explain why not A is applicable.?


I think the answer to your question lies in the higlighted part part of Option A.
The case of "almost" is never mentioned in the prompt. "Almost", here denotes that sometimes the statement about parents of not eating breakfast was not true. Hence it is not generic and can be eliminated in terms of replicating the prompt.

And hence, D automatically becomes the best option.
GMAT Club Bot
The foreign minister of Zeria announced today that her country was sev [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6920 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
238 posts
CR Forum Moderator
832 posts

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne