Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,087
 [11]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
10
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AK1307
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 02 Jan 2019
Last visit: 10 May 2021
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
4
 [2]
Given Kudos: 272
Schools: LBS '23 (A)
Schools: LBS '23 (A)
Posts: 17
Kudos: 4
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Shilpa04
Joined: 15 Jun 2019
Last visit: 30 Jun 2021
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
10
 [3]
Given Kudos: 133
Posts: 11
Kudos: 10
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BlueBook
Joined: 17 Oct 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Given Kudos: 109
Location: Kenya
Concentration: Leadership, Strategy
GMAT 1: 510 Q26 V34
WE:Science (Energy)
GMAT 1: 510 Q26 V34
Posts: 55
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shilpa04
Conclusion - "Therefore, in contrast to regular newspaper reading, regular watching of network television news programs increases the tendency to think of public issues in oversimplified terms."
We are comparing Regular newspaper reading to Regular watching of TV news.

Option D also looks like a good option. It provides additional information that opposing views are discussed on Television, implying discussion happens on TV and people don't receive the news in oversimplified terms.

Analysis of option A -
Quote:
Regular watchers of network television news programs are much more likely than other people to be habitual readers of newspapers.
I feel this option is narrow in scope. This option does not cover those people who watch only TV news. Such people will receive news in oversimplified terms, hence conclusion will be weakened.

Please help me to clear the gap in my understanding.

Even if they discuss opposing views on TV, they only do so for 30seconds which is not enough to cover all the details for meaningful and insightful discussion. Therefore, watching TV news alone is not enough. However, if people who regularly watch TV news are even more likely to read newspapers and get more information, this weakens the conclusion that regular watching of TV news leads to oversimplification of public issues in contrast with regularly reading newspapers.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
2,258
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The format of network television news programs generally allows advocates of a point of view only 30 seconds to convey their message. Consequently, regular watchers become accustomed to thinking of issues in terms only of slogans and catch phrases, and so the expectation of careful discussion of public issues gradually disappears from their awareness. The format of newspaper stories, on the other hand, leads readers to pursue details of stories headed by the most important facts and so has the opposite effect on regular readers—that of maintaining the expectation of careful discussion of public issues. Therefore, in contrast to regular newspaper reading, regular watching of network television news programs increases the tendency to think of public issues in oversimplified terms.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?


(A) Regular watchers of network television news programs are much more likely than other people to be habitual readers of newspapers.

(B) Including any 30-second quotations from proponents of diverse views, the total amount of time devoted to a single topic on regular network television news programs averages less than one and a half minutes.

(C) The format of network television news programs does not include roundtable discussion of issues among informed proponents of diverse views.

(D) Television news reports tend to devote equal time to discussion of opposing views.

(E) People who watch the most television, measured in average number of hours of watching per week, tend not to be regular readers of newspapers.
Only A and D stand out a chance.

D is good in the sense that it gives a reason to think that TV news programs give ample unbiased approach, when instead it is about the time readers must devote to digest/understand the news with proper facts. If the passage had mentioned that 30-sec is enough to make judgements then this option had a stronger case, but it is not so.

A gives clear picture that readers are the viewers of TV news programs. Thus, the tendency to think of public issues in oversimplified terms is not increases as it gets balanced out by newspaper reading. Those who don't watch news programs at all are not considered out and thus no bias is left i.e. no oversimplification.

Answer A.
User avatar
mavrck0102
Joined: 18 Sep 2022
Last visit: 15 Aug 2024
Posts: 121
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Posts: 121
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument states that regular watching of network television news programs increases the tendency to think of public issues in oversimplified terms because of the format of the programs, while regular newspaper reading maintains the expectation of careful discussion of public issues. We need to find an option that weakens this argument.

Option (A) states that regular watchers of network television news programs are more likely to be habitual readers of newspapers. This weakens the argument because it suggests that individuals who watch television news also engage in newspaper reading, which implies that they are exposed to more detailed discussions of public issues and are not solely reliant on the oversimplified format of television news programs.

Option (B) provides information about the total time devoted to a single topic on television news programs. Although it highlights the limited time available for each viewpoint, it doesn't directly weaken the argument regarding oversimplified thinking.

Option (C) states that the format of network television news programs does not include roundtable discussions among informed proponents of diverse views. This actually supports the argument, as it suggests that there is limited opportunity for careful discussion of public issues on television news.

Option (D) suggests that television news reports devote equal time to discussion of opposing views. While this may promote balance, it doesn't address the issue of oversimplified thinking or the expectation of careful discussion.

Option (E) states that people who watch the most television tend not to be regular readers of newspapers. This supports the argument, as it implies that individuals who primarily rely on television news may be less exposed to the detailed discussions found in newspapers.

Therefore, the option that most seriously weakens the argument is (A) Regular watchers of network television news programs are much more likely than other people to be habitual readers of newspapers.
User avatar
Spidy16845
Joined: 17 Jun 2023
Last visit: 04 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could someone explain to me how option A is right?

Passage: Watching news channel oversimplifies news.
Option A: People who watch news channel also read news paper, so effect gets mitigated.

Option A doesn't contradict that watching news oversimplify, rather it simply state that effect get's mitigated.
User avatar
ahddhah
Joined: 04 Aug 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 19
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q88 V79 DI79
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q88 V77 DI81
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q87 V83 DI78
Products:
GMAT Focus 3: 655 Q87 V83 DI78
Posts: 62
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Regular TV watching and regular news paper reading cant be mixed with regular news paper reader and regular television watchers.
The argument was about TV watching
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts