Experts, Could you please explain question 2?
dabaobao, can you pitch in, since your passage map was on similar lines as mine is?
Quote:
It can be inferred from the passage that, in general, strategic planning during the 1980s had all of the following shortcomings EXCEPT
(A) reliance on outside consultants who did not necessarily understand the nuts and bolts of the business
(B) a dependence on theoretical models that did not always perfectly describe the workings of the company
(C) an inherent weakness in the company’s own ability to implement the strategic plan
(D) an excess of information and data that made it difficult to get to key concepts
(E) the lack of a forum for middle managers to express their ideas
Q-structure:Mark which is NOT the shortcomings of the SP during the 1980s
I understand
HOW the correct answer is C:
Passage states: Unlike nineteen-eighties and nineties corporations that blindly followed their five-year plans even when they were misguided, today’s corporations tend to second guess.
The gist: The corporation in the 1980s
blindly followed the plans without bothering about the repercussions,
i.e.,
they were NOT weak in implementing the adopted plan.
However, I am
skeptical about A.
(A) reliance on outside consultants who did not necessarily understand the nuts and bolts of the business
Passage states: An outsider can help facilitate the process, but in the final analysis, if the company doesn’t make the plan, the company won’t follow the plan.
- The company is accounted for shortcomings because of its inactions.
I am not able to correlate HOW an outsider, even after facilitating the process, is attributed to the shortcomings.
Reasoning for above stance - Since A is NOT the answer, we ARE regarding outsiders as the shortcomings.
Also, how can we be sure:
consultants did not necessarily understand the nuts and bolts of the business.