bv8562
[url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=GMATNinja%5D%5Bb%5DGMATNinja%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=TommyWallach%5D%5Bb%5DTommyWallach%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=EducationAisle%5D%5Bb%5DEducationAisle%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D [url=https://gmatclub.com:443/forum/memberlist.php?mode=viewprofile&un=IanStewart%5D%5Bb%5DIanStewart%5B/b%5D%5B/url%5D According to the rule, when a present participial phrase is preceded by a clause it modifies the entire preceding clause and takes as its agent the subject of the preceding clause. So, based on the this rule, when I plug in option C is it conveying "The Glass House mountains named themselves"? Is this another reason for eliminating option C? Please reply!
Yeah, I think that's valid reasoning here. If you read (C) literally, it certainly sounds as though the mountains are naming themselves. Just make sure you don't convert this into a rule that the "-ing" phrase is
always an action performed by the subject of the previous clause.
In other words, if you see, "Tim missed nine consecutive shots in the fourth quarter, allowing the opposition to rally for the win," you want to make sure you're interpreting this to mean that Tim's action -- missing nine shots -- allowed the other team to rally. It wouldn't be quite accurate to say that Tim
himself allowed the opposition to rally.
All to say: you’re absolutely right. Just make sure not to lose the nuance of how these "-ing" modifiers work.
I hope that helps!