Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
13 Dec 2019, 08:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
The government of Storinia has proposed to conduct several particle physics experiments in Antarctica, as described below.
The ultra-high-energy cosmic ray detector (UHECR-D) will track a variety of subatomic particles traveling from outer space with exceptionally high kinetic energy by recording secondary showers of particles created by these UHECRs as they collide with the upper atmosphere.
The polyethylene naphthalate neutrino observatory (PEN-NO) will search for neutrinos, extremely light and fast subatomic particles that interact only weakly with normal matter. To prevent spurious results from cosmic rays, PEN-NO will be buried deep below the ice.
The magnetic monopole detector (MaMoD) will attempt to verify the existence of magnetic monopoles, hypothetical subatomic particles postulated by some physical theories to be left over from the creation of the universe.
The ultra-high-energy cosmic ray detector (UHECR-D) will track a variety of subatomic particles traveling from outer space with exceptionally high kinetic energy by recording secondary showers of particles created by these UHECRs as they collide with the upper atmosphere.
The polyethylene naphthalate neutrino observatory (PEN-NO) will search for neutrinos, extremely light and fast subatomic particles that interact only weakly with normal matter. To prevent spurious results from cosmic rays, PEN-NO will be buried deep below the ice.
The magnetic monopole detector (MaMoD) will attempt to verify the existence of magnetic monopoles, hypothetical subatomic particles postulated by some physical theories to be left over from the creation of the universe.
With a construction budget of $30 million, the Storinian government will be able to search for a proof of an explanation of charge quantization and to help resolve a controversy by measuring the speed of neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors.: No
Inits Antarctic experiments, the Storinian government will attempt to ascertain the mass and speed of cosmic rays and to confirm the composition of magnetic monopoles.: No
If the PEN-NO experiment is kept in operation on the surface of the ice in Antarctica, its findings will be considered more valid than those produced by the experiment as currently envisioned.: No
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
45%
(medium)
Question Stats:
61% (03:44) correct
39%
(03:33)
wrong
based on 811
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
1. For each of the following statements, select Yes if the statement is supported by the evidence provided. Otherwise, select No.
| Yes | No | |
| With a construction budget of $30 million, the Storinian government will be able to search for a proof of an explanation of charge quantization and to help resolve a controversy by measuring the speed of neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors. | ||
| Inits Antarctic experiments, the Storinian government will attempt to ascertain the mass and speed of cosmic rays and to confirm the composition of magnetic monopoles. | ||
| If the PEN-NO experiment is kept in operation on the surface of the ice in Antarctica, its findings will be considered more valid than those produced by the experiment as currently envisioned. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
With a construction budget of $30 million, the Storinian government will be able to search for a proof of an explanation of charge quantization and to help resolve a controversy by measuring the speed of neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors.: No
Inits Antarctic experiments, the Storinian government will attempt to ascertain the mass and speed of cosmic rays and to confirm the composition of magnetic monopoles.: No
If the PEN-NO experiment is kept in operation on the surface of the ice in Antarctica, its findings will be considered more valid than those produced by the experiment as currently envisioned.: No
Neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
5%
(low)
Question Stats:
86% (01:13) correct
14%
(01:43)
wrong
based on 759
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
2. According to the information provided, the proposed measurement of which of the following kinds of particles is intended to improve the quality of estimation of the mass of these particles?
| Ultra-high energy cosmic rays. | |
| Particles created by UHECRs above the earth. | |
| Neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors. | |
| Neutrinos that originate in the sun. | |
| Magnetic monopoles. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors.
Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray.: Cannot Conclude
Particles created by UHECRs above the earth.: Cannot Conclude
Magnetic monopole.: Cannot Conclude
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
85%
(hard)
Question Stats:
45% (01:44) correct
55%
(01:38)
wrong
based on 856
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
3. For each of the following particle types, select Can Conclude if you can conclude from the information provided that the particles in question have a minimal effect on ordinary matter. Otherwise, select Cannot Conclude.
| Can Conclude | Cannot Conclude | |
| Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray. | ||
| Particles created by UHECRs above the earth. | ||
| Magnetic monopole. |
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
Ultra-high-energy cosmic ray.: Cannot Conclude
Particles created by UHECRs above the earth.: Cannot Conclude
Magnetic monopole.: Cannot Conclude
13 Dec 2019, 08:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
1)A) No, since total construction budget of 42$ is provided in the information, but there is no mention about the individual cost of each of these projects.
B)No,since mass calculation is for neutrinos and not for cosmic rays
C)No,Since it's clearly written in the proposal of PEN-NO that it should be buried deep in ice, in order to avoid spurious results from cosmic rays
2) Neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors is intended for mass calculation.
3) Cannot be concluded, since there is no info in the above paragraphs about the effect to the ordinary matter with these three particles
Posted from my mobile device
B)No,since mass calculation is for neutrinos and not for cosmic rays
C)No,Since it's clearly written in the proposal of PEN-NO that it should be buried deep in ice, in order to avoid spurious results from cosmic rays
2) Neutrinos produced in nuclear reactors is intended for mass calculation.
3) Cannot be concluded, since there is no info in the above paragraphs about the effect to the ordinary matter with these three particles
Posted from my mobile device
19 Nov 2021, 04:40
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dear Sajjad1994
could you check the validity of Q3 answers.
3. For each of the following particle types, select Can Conclude if you can conclude from the information provided that the particles in question have a minimal effect on ordinary matter. Otherwise, select Cannot Conclude.
Option B: Neutrinos produced in particle accelerators
Tab "Proposal": The polyethylene naphthalate neutrino observatory (PEN-NO) will search for neutrinos, extremely light and fast subatomic particles that interact only weakly with normal matter.
We can infer that Normal matter = Ordinary Matter and that "only weakly interaction signifies the meager effect"
Tab "Purpose": PEN-NO will measure the mass and speed of neutrinos produced in particle accelerators
Taking into consideration both facts we can infer that "Neutrinos produced in particle accelerators" have minimal effect on ordinary matter.
could you check the validity of Q3 answers.
3. For each of the following particle types, select Can Conclude if you can conclude from the information provided that the particles in question have a minimal effect on ordinary matter. Otherwise, select Cannot Conclude.
Option B: Neutrinos produced in particle accelerators
Tab "Proposal": The polyethylene naphthalate neutrino observatory (PEN-NO) will search for neutrinos, extremely light and fast subatomic particles that interact only weakly with normal matter.
We can infer that Normal matter = Ordinary Matter and that "only weakly interaction signifies the meager effect"
Tab "Purpose": PEN-NO will measure the mass and speed of neutrinos produced in particle accelerators
Taking into consideration both facts we can infer that "Neutrinos produced in particle accelerators" have minimal effect on ordinary matter.
