Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Is INSEAD your dream b-school and you're looking for solid prep and application strategies to get there? Check out Barkavi’s end-to-end journey to know how she did! Get insights into the INSEAD admissions process, know what Adcoms look at, and more!
More Target Test Prep students are earning 100th percentile GMAT scores. Don’t settle for less when the Target Test Prep course gives you everything you need to score high on the GMAT. Start your 5-day free trial today.
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Originally posted by Bunuel on 02 Sep 2020, 03:56.
Last edited by Bunuel on 24 Dec 2024, 08:56, edited 6 times in total.
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
15
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Show timer
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide Answer
Correct Answer
Hide
Show
History
Dropdown 1: 4
Dropdown 2: 30,000 acres more
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Select the dropdowns below and click "Submit" to add this question to your Error log.
Difficulty:
95%
(hard)
Question Stats:
30%
(03:27)
correct 70%
(03:43)
wrong
based on 202
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was approximately times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
Official Solution:
Drop-down 1:
Assuming the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was 100 \(unit^2\) in 1982, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) would be 50 \(unit^2\) in the same year. From the graph, we see that the rural areas of both Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) increased by 40%, so in 1997, the combined rural area would become 140 \(unit^2\). Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 37.5 \(unit^2\). Therefore, in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was \(\frac{140}{37.5} \approx 4\) times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
Drop-down 2:
Delaware's cropland decreased by 35% from 1982 to 1997, so 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{380,000}{0.65} \approx 585,000\) acres. During the same period, Maryland's (MD) cropland decreased by 10%, so 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{500,000}{0.90} \approx 555,000\) acres. Therefore, in 1982, Delaware had approximately 30,000 acres more cropland than Maryland.
1. Let the pasture area of West Virginia before and after be \(W_1\) and \(W_2\). Also let the rural areas of Pennsylvania and Virginia before and after be \(P_1\), \(P_2\), \(V_1\), and \(V_2\), respectively.
2. It is known that \(2W_1 = P_1 + V_1\).
3. From the charts it can be deduced: \((1 - 0.25) * W_1 = W_2\), \((1 + 0.4) * P_1 = P_2\), and \((1 + 0.4) * V_1 = V_2\).
4. The question asks us to find the value of \(\frac{P_2 + V_2}{W_2}\). It can be simplified into \(\frac{P_2 + V_2}{W_2} = \frac{1.4P_1 + 1.4V_1}{0.75W_1} = \frac{1.4(P_1 + V_1)}{0.75 * 0.5(P_1 + V_1)} \approx 3.73\), which is closest to 3.5.
5. Let the cropland area of Delaware and Maryland before and after be \(D_1\), \(D_2\), \(M_1\), and \(M_2\), respectively.
6. It is known that \(D_2 = 380000\) and \(M_2 = 500000\).
7. From the charts it can be deduced: \((1 - 0.35)D_1 = D_2 \rightarrow D_1 = \frac{380000}{0.65} \approx 584615\) and \((1 - 0.1)M_1 = M_2 \rightarrow M_1 = \frac{500000}{0.9} \approx 555555\).
8. The questions asks to find \(D_1 - M_1 = 584615 - 555555 = 29060\), which is about 30000 acres more.
9. Our answer will be: 3.5 and "30000 acres more."
I have a doubt: "Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 40 unit2."
When unit2 is 50 and it is reduced by 25%, it becomes 12.5, so its 140/37.5, which is almost 3.7. When we round off 3.7 we get 4. I selected 4 as an answer as per this approximation.
Bunuel
Bunuel
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
Official Solution:
Drop-down 1:
Assuming the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was 100 unit2 in 1982, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) would be 50 unit2 in the same year. From the graph, we see that the rural areas of both Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) increased by 40%, so in 1997, the combined rural area would become 140 unit2. Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 40 unit2. Therefore, in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was \(\frac{140}{40} = 3.5\) times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
Drop-down 2:
Delaware's cropland decreased by 35% from 1982 to 1997, so 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{380,000}{0.65} \approx 585,000\) acres. During the same period, Maryland's (MD) cropland decreased by 10%, so 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{500,000}{0.90} \approx 555,000\) acres. Therefore, in 1982, Delaware had approximately 30,000 acres more cropland than Maryland.
I have a doubt: "Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 40 unit2."
When unit2 is 50 and it is reduced by 25%, it becomes 12.5, so its 140/37.5, which is almost 3.7. When we round off 3.7 we get 4. I selected 4 as an answer as per this approximation.
Bunuel
Bunuel
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
Official Solution:
Drop-down 1:
Assuming the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was 100 unit2 in 1982, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) would be 50 unit2 in the same year. From the graph, we see that the rural areas of both Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) increased by 40%, so in 1997, the combined rural area would become 140 unit2. Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 40 unit2. Therefore, in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was \(\frac{140}{40} = 3.5\) times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
Drop-down 2:
Delaware's cropland decreased by 35% from 1982 to 1997, so 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{380,000}{0.65} \approx 585,000\) acres. During the same period, Maryland's (MD) cropland decreased by 10%, so 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{500,000}{0.90} \approx 555,000\) acres. Therefore, in 1982, Delaware had approximately 30,000 acres more cropland than Maryland.
Correct answer:
Dropdown 1: "3.5"
Dropdown 2: "30,000 acres more"
The question had old solution. It's updated now. Thank you!
I have a doubt: "Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 40 unit2."
When unit2 is 50 and it is reduced by 25%, it becomes 12.5, so its 140/37.5, which is almost 3.7. When we round off 3.7 we get 4. I selected 4 as an answer as per this approximation.
Bunuel
Bunuel
The graph shows the percent change in the area of different land cover types across five states (DE, MD, PA, VA, and WV) from 1982 to 1997.
Select from each drop-down menu the option that creates the most accurate statement based on the information provided.
If the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was twice that of the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) in 1982, then in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
If Delaware (DE) had 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 and Maryland (MD) had 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997, then Delaware had approximately cropland than Maryland in 1982.
Official Solution:
Drop-down 1:
Assuming the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was 100 unit2 in 1982, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) would be 50 unit2 in the same year. From the graph, we see that the rural areas of both Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) increased by 40%, so in 1997, the combined rural area would become 140 unit2. Meanwhile, the pasture area in West Virginia (WV) decreased by 25%, reducing it to 40 unit2. Therefore, in 1997, the combined rural area of Pennsylvania (PA) and Virginia (VA) was \(\frac{140}{40} = 3.5\) times larger than the pasture area in West Virginia.
Drop-down 2:
Delaware's cropland decreased by 35% from 1982 to 1997, so 380,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{380,000}{0.65} \approx 585,000\) acres. During the same period, Maryland's (MD) cropland decreased by 10%, so 500,000 acres of cropland in 1997 implies that in 1982 it was \(\frac{500,000}{0.90} \approx 555,000\) acres. Therefore, in 1982, Delaware had approximately 30,000 acres more cropland than Maryland.
Correct answer:
Dropdown 1: "3.5"
Dropdown 2: "30,000 acres more"
The question had old solution. It's updated now. Thank you!
Multi-Source Reasoning isn’t the Reading Assignment, but rather the investigation of data. The sooner you realize this, the earlier you will gain control over the time you spend on MSR question types in Data Insights.