Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Updated on: 31 May 2016, 22:00
Originally posted by jet1445 on 02 Aug 2007, 21:19.
Last edited by Skywalker18 on 31 May 2016, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Skywalker18 on 31 May 2016, 22:00, edited 1 time in total.
Added the OA
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
25%
(medium)
Question Stats:
78% (01:51) correct
22%
(01:42)
wrong
based on 89
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
1.The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta, of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites.In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans,
The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a majkor city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.
In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists. Evidence ,it would Useful to determine which of the following ?
A. whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities
B. Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avaris
C. Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan
D. Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose found at Avaris
E. whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been found in Egypt
The Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a majkor city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.
In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists. Evidence ,it would Useful to determine which of the following ?
A. whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities
B. Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avaris
C. Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan
D. Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C.continued to produce artifacts similar to whose found at Avaris
E. whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been found in Egypt
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
03 Aug 2007, 08:30
Kudos
Bookmarks
Same here, I agree with A.
If the artifacts were NOT traded outside Canaanite then that would support the argument.
If the artifacts were NOT traded outside Canaanite then that would support the argument.
04 Aug 2007, 09:22
Kudos
Bookmarks
Yes A.
If the artifacts were not traded oustide Canaanite cities then it would weaken the argument.
If the artifacts were not traded oustide Canaanite cities then it would weaken the argument.
