OE from
Manhattan PrepThere’s no obvious way to set this problem up algebraically, so work backwards from the answer choices. The problem asks for the next integer that satisfies the requirements—in other words, the smallest of the given choices—so begin by testing the smallest value, 153, and then work upward.
First, break the number into its prime components: 153 = (51)(3) = (17)(3)(3). Next, can these primes be combined so that two consecutive integers will produce 153?
No. (3)(3) = 9, but this is not consecutive with 17. (17)(3) would be way too big. This can’t be the right answer.
Try the next smallest answer. First, break 210 into primes: 210 = (10)(21) = (2)(5)(3)(7).
(2)(3) = 6, so 210 is the product of 3 consecutive integers (5, 6, and 7). Is there a way to combine the primes into two consecutive integers?
Yes! (2)(7) = 14 and (3)(5) = 15. The number 210 fits the requirements, and it is the smallest of the answer choices, so it must be the next largest integer (after 6) that can be written as the product of two consecutive integers and as the product of three consecutive integers.
The correct answer is (B).