Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100%
(00:00)
correct 0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 1
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?
A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
C) Subsidies pose a burden to taxpayers and support inefficient businesses.
D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
please explain
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
Only C and E are worth mentioning.........
But what works against E is that the author specifically states that the new industries would bank on known local demand....
New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers
A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
may worsen the balance of trade, but insufficient
B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
out of scope
C) Subsidies pose a burden to taxpayers and support inefficient businesses.
ok : burden to taxpayers=>reduced purchasing power=>lower local demand.
Inefficient businesses => higher export prices=>worsen balance of trade
D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
out of scope
E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
and??
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?
A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
C) Subsidies pose a burden to taxpayers and support inefficient businesses.
D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
please explain
Show more
Between C and E.. I am trying to understand the question.. Question is asking the weakness in the economic strategy.. not how it can be weakened..
I have to pick C over E. As E is a statement that weakens the argument.
The Japanese economic model created strong domestic industries through subsidies from its Ministry of Trade and by closing off competitive foreign firms to its domestic market. This strategy promised to help economic growth by incubating domestic industries. New Japanese industries could count on a known local demand and would be protected from competition by tariffs and other barriers. The program could reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade.
Which of the following, based on the passage above, is a weakness in this economic strategy?
A) A protectionist policy will create animosity among other nations.
B) Fast growth of small industries will create a class of millionaires and increase the inequality of income.
C) Subsidies pose a burden to taxpayers and support inefficient businesses.
D) Quotas are more regressive than tariffs.
E) The demand for the products made by the incubated industries would not be known.
please explain
Show more
C.
A: We don't care about animosity amongst other nations. Irrelevant B: We are interested in "reduce the amount of imports and therefore improve the nation's balance of trade". The argument says nothing about inequality of wealth distribution or about creation of millionaires. Out C: "inefficient businesses" are counterproductive to what the argument claims to be a result of this approach "strong domestic industries". Therefore C hits the nail on the head. D: The effect of quotas and tariffs would have to be guessed, since the argument does not say what their effect is. Too vague. E contradicts one of the premises, and cannot be true.
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.