Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 16:26 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 16:26
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,368
 [29]
Kudos
Add Kudos
29
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,632
Own Kudos:
6,127
 [5]
Given Kudos: 173
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,632
Kudos: 6,127
 [5]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
sachi-in
Joined: 12 Oct 2023
Last visit: 18 Oct 2025
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
284
 [2]
Given Kudos: 146
Posts: 123
Kudos: 284
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
rmahe11
Joined: 13 Oct 2023
Last visit: 15 Aug 2025
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99
Posts: 112
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
­The main measure of national economic activity—the gross domestic product (GDP)—simply totals the monetary value of goods and services produced. It ignores social costs such as depletion of natural resources or environmental pollution. Some economists argue that to place a dollar figure on these costs in GDP accounting would be to introduce value judgments into what should remain an objective measure. However, in excluding these costs the GDP already contains an implicit value judgment, valuing them at zero.

Which of the following most accurately states the point toward which the passage is directed?


This question is a Conclusion question, and the correct answer will be a conclusion supported by the statements in the passage.

A. The GDP as currently measured does not contain information that would make it possible to estimate social costs, such as depletion of natural resources or environmental pollution.

The passage does not indicate that social costs cannot be estimated because of lack of information.

Rather, the possible issue with accounting for social costs that is mentioned in the passage is that doing so involves making value judgments. In other words, the passage indicates that estimates of social costs can be made through making value judgments, but some economists disagree with using such estimates in calculating GDP.

Eliminate.

B. The economists are being inconsistent in exluding social costs from the GDP on the grounds that including them would not be objective.

The passage supports this conclusion.

After all, it says that economists argue that to place a dollar figure on social costs would be introducing value judgments into what should remain an objective measure, but they make a value judgment in excluding these costs.

Simply put, the passage indicates that economists argue against making value judgments in calculating GDP but are making one themselves. So, the passage indicates that what the economists say and do confict with each other, i.e., are "inconsistent."

That information supports the conclusion that "The economists are being inconsistent in exluding social costs from the GDP on the grounds that including them would not be objective."

Keep.

C. The economists fail to realize that environmental pollution and the depletion of natural resources have social costs.

The passage says the following:

Some economists argue that to place a dollar figure on these (social) costs in GDP accounting would be to introduce value judgments

So, contrary to what this choice says, the passage indicates that the economists realize that social costs exist.

Eliminate.

D. Any goods or services that cause depletion of natural resources or environmental pollution ought to be excluded from the GDP.

The passage does not advocate for excluding anything from the GDP.

Rather, it provides a reason to take something additional, social costs, into account.

Eliminate.

E. Social costs such as depletion of natural resources and environmental pollution can be determined as objectively as can the total monetary value of goods and services produced.

The information in the passage does not support the idea that social costs can be determined as objectively as values of goods and services.

Rather, it provides a reason to take social costs into account, even if putting placing a dollar figure on social costs involves introducing "value judgments," meaning making determinations that are not as objective as others involved in calculating GDP.

Eliminate.

Correct answer:
­Hi,

I am not sure whether this argument is correct or not , the very thing which economists argue is being contrasted that has an implicit value which is considered "0" as per last line. So how, can we estimate the value if its zero . GMATNinja would you like to interfere and suggest an alternative ?
User avatar
Pr4n
Joined: 23 May 2025
Last visit: 15 Oct 2025
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q83 V82 DI80
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q84 V85 DI80
GMAT Focus 2: 665 Q84 V85 DI80
Posts: 91
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think you are confused, we need to conclude the argument and looks like you did find the fact that there is contrast between what is being said by the economist and what is being done, and this is what in fact the right conclusion of this passage says. That the economist are being inconsistent when they said that value judgement can't be part of an objective measure, but excluding them totally means that they have actually judged them to have a value of "0".

Plus remeber in certain CR question as soon as we read we might feel that the argument is not making sense, but then focus on the stem. Maybe it's just a bold face so you don't need to evaluate the validity of the argument. Similarly here, we just need to focus on what is the point that author of the passage is trying to make. And if this was a logical flaw question then these reasoning skills might have been needed.

rmahe11
­Hi,

I am not sure whether this argument is correct or not , the very thing which economists argue is being contrasted that has an implicit value which is considered "0" as per last line. So how, can we estimate the value if its zero . GMATNinja would you like to interfere and suggest an alternative ?
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
189 posts