Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Practice Question Question No.: RC 131 ~ 136 Page: 362
The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and 1970’s sought to go beyond the traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens. Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women. The very techniques these historians used to uncover mass political behavior in the nineteenth-century United States—quantitative analyses of election returns, for example—were useless in analyzing the political activities of women, who were denied the vote until 1920.
By redefining “political activity,” historian Paula Baker has developed a political history that includes women. She concludes that among ordinary citizens, political activism by women in the nineteenth century prefigured trends in twentieth-century politics. Defining “politics” as “any action taken to affect the course of behavior of government or of the community,” Baker concludes that, while voting and holding office were restricted to men, women in the nineteenth century organized themselves into societies committed to social issues such as temperance and poverty. In other words, Baker contends, women activists were early practitioners of nonpartisan, issue-oriented politics and thus were more interested in enlisting lawmakers, regardless of their party affiliation, on behalf of certain issues than in ensuring that one party or another won an election. In the twentieth century, more men drew closer to women’s ideas about politics and took up modes of issue-oriented politics that Baker sees women as having pioneered.
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) enumerate reason why both traditional scholarly methods and newer scholarly methods have limitations (B) identify a shortcoming in a scholarly approach and describe an alternative approach (C) provide empirical data to support a long-held scholarly assumption (D) compare two scholarly publications on the basis of their authors’ backgrounds (E) attempt to provide a partial answer to a long-standing scholarly dilemma
2. The passage suggests which of the following concerning the techniques used by the new political historians described in the first paragraph of the passage?
(A) They involved the extensive use of the biographies of political party leaders and political theoreticians. (B) They were conceived by political historians who were reacting against the political climates of the 1960's and 1970's (C) They were of more use in analyzing the positions of United States political parties in the nineteenth century than in analyzing the positions of those in the twentieth century. (D) They were of more use in analyzing the political behavior of nineteenth-century voters than in analyzing the political activities of those who could not vote during that period. (E) They were devised as a means of tracing the influence of nineteenth-century political trends on twentieth-century political trends.
3. It can be inferred that the author of the passage quotes Baker directly in the second paragraph primarily in order to
(A) clarify a position before providing an alternative to that position (B) differentiate between a novel definition and traditional definitions (C) provide an example of a point agreed on by different generations of scholars (D) provide an example of the prose style of an important historian (E) amplify a definition given in the first pargraph
4. According to the passage, Paula Baker and the new political historians of the 1960’s and 1970’s shared which of the following?
(A) A commitment to interest-group politics (B) A disregard for political theory and ideology (C) An interest in the ways in which nineteenth-century politics prefigured contemporary politics (D) A reliance on such quantitative techniques as the analysis of election returns (E) An emphasis on the political involvement of ordinary citizens
5. Which of the following best describes the structure of the first paragraph of the passage?
(A) Two scholarly approaches are compared, and a shortcoming common to both is identified. (B) Two rival schools of thought are contrasted, and a third is alluded to. (C) An outmoded scholarly approach is described, and a corrective approach is called for. (D) An argument is outlined, and counter arguments are mentioned. (E) A historical era is described in terms of its political trends.
6. The information in the passage suggests that a pre-1960’s political historian would have been most likely to undertake which of the following studies?
(A) An analysis of voting trends among women voters of the 1920’s (B) A study of male voters’ gradual ideological shift from party politics to issue-oriented politics (C) A biography of an influential nineteenth-century minister of foreign affairs (D) An analysis of narratives written by previously unrecognized women activists (E) A study of voting trends among naturalized immigrant laborers in a nineteenth-century logging camp
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2008, 14:20
3
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to
(A) enumerate reason why both traditional scholarly methods and newer scholarly methods have limitations True, but it goes beyond that... (B) identify a shortcoming in a scholarly approach and describe an alternative approach identifies shortcomings in the old and newer school of thoughts, and describes Baker's alternative approach. Correct (C) provide empirical data to support a long-held scholarly assumption No basis (D) compare two sholarly publications on the basis of their authors’ backgrounds No basis (E) attempt to provide a partial answer to a lon-standing scholarly dilemna No basis
2. The passage suggests which of the following concerning the techniques used by the new political historians described in the first paragraph of the passage?
(A) They involved the extensive use of the biographies of political party leaders and political theoreticians. This is the old school (B) They were conceived by political historians who were reacting against the political climates of the 1960s and 1970s not so much as in reaction as a shift in idealogy (C) They were of more use in analyzing the positions of United States political parties in the nineteenth century than in analyzing the positions of those in the twentieth century. not relevant (D) They were of more use in analyzing the political behavior of nineteenth-century voters than in analyzing the political activities of those who could not vote during that period. Bingo! They studied voters, but they disregarded the political activities of others, especially women, who could not vote at the time. (E) They were devised as a means of tracing the influence of nineteenth-century political trends on twentieth-century political trends. not relevant
3. It ban be inferred that the author of the passage quotes Baker directly in the second paragraph primarily in order to (A) clarify a position before providing an alternative ot that position (B) differentiate between a novel definition and traditional definitions IMO, B gives the more substantial argument for the author to quote Baker. (C) provide an example of a point agreed on by different generations of scholars (D) provide an example of the prose style of an important historian (E) amplify a definition given in the first pargraph
4. According to the passage, Paula Baker and the new political historians of the 1960’s and 1970’s shared which of the following? (A) A commitment to interest-group politics (B) A disregard for political theory and ideology (C) An interest in the ways in which nineteenth-century politics prefigured contemporary politics (D) A reliance on such quatitiative techniques as the analysis of election returns (E) An emphasis on the political involvement of ordinary citizens Exactly. They shifted their focus from the leaders and their biographies to the masses.
5. Which of the following best describes the structure of the first paragraph of the passage? (A) Two scholarly approaches are compared, and a shortcoming common to both is identified. Both old and the newer schools of historians neglected the role of women in politics. Correct (B) Two rival schools of thought are contrasted, and a third is alluded to. (C) An outmoded scholarly approach is described, and a corrective approach is called for. (D) An argument is outlined, and counter arguments are mentioned. (E) A historical era is described in terms of its political trends.
6. The information in the passage suggests that a pre1960’s political historian would have been most likely to undertake which of the following studies? C. All others pertain to the masses, the study of which was not in practice prior to the 1960s.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2008, 15:36
Guys, just out of curiosity, have you been timing your passages?
Actually do you keep track of the time when solving these practice problems. My approach is to practice a ton of passages and get myself really familiar with the questions and reasoning logic required to answer each of them effectively. I plan to start practicing under a under timed environment pretty soon. However, the issue I come across while practicing under time is that I tend to focus more on the time rather than the passage. Its like someone shouting in my ears -- hurry UPPP, you are running out of time. You know what I mean?
How do you guys go about practicing RC's. I'd appreciate it if you could share your approach/strategy. Later!
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Jul 2008, 17:59
2
vksunder wrote:
Guys, just out of curiosity, have you been timing your passages?
Actually do you keep track of the time when solving these practice problems. My approach is to practice a ton of passages and get myself really familiar with the questions and reasoning logic required to answer each of them effectively. I plan to start practicing under a under timed environment pretty soon. However, the issue I come across while practicing under time is that I tend to focus more on the time rather than the passage. Its like someone shouting in my ears -- hurry UPPP, you are running out of time. You know what I mean?
How do you guys go about practicing RC's. I'd appreciate it if you could share your approach/strategy. Later!
record your time, but don't limit your time. Always record your time, then you'll get use to it, and won't feel the stress of having to finish within x amount of time.
Once you have a good baseline of how long you're taking for the passages, then start limiting your time to add the time pressure. You'll get use to it.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jul 2016, 00:20
Hi,
Regarding below question: 5. Which of the following best describes the structure of the first paragraph of the passage? (A) Two scholarly approaches are compared, and a shortcoming common to both is identified. Both old and the newer schools of historians neglected the role of women in politics. Correct (B) Two rival schools of thought are contrasted, and a third is alluded to. (C) An outmoded scholarly approach is described, and a corrective approach is called for. (D) An argument is outlined, and counter arguments are mentioned. (E) A historical era is described in terms of its political trends.
The passage says "Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women". What I inferred from this like is "New approach neglected women and old approach included women". Since word however is used to show contrast. But, my inference is wrong as per OE. Please experts someone help me.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2016, 21:26
JarvisR wrote:
9 mins all correct. ~3 mins for Para.
Hi JarvisR,
Regarding below question: 5. Which of the following best describes the structure of the first paragraph of the passage? (A) Two scholarly approaches are compared, and a shortcoming common to both is identified. Both old and the newer schools of historians neglected the role of women in politics. Correct (B) Two rival schools of thought are contrasted, and a third is alluded to. (C) An outmoded scholarly approach is described, and a corrective approach is called for. (D) An argument is outlined, and counter arguments are mentioned. (E) A historical era is described in terms of its political trends.
The passage says "Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women". What I inferred from this like is "New approach neglected women and old approach included women". Since word however is used to show contrast. But, my inference is wrong as per OE. Please help me.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
13 Jul 2016, 05:13
1
Top Contributor
Sunil01: Apologises for late response. Leme know if this answers ur query.
The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and 1970’s sought to go beyond the traditional focus blah blah... Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women.
>> A new school of PH emerged... However, like old approach, new approach suffered same flaw. How?
The very techniques these historians used to uncover mass political behavior in the nineteenth-century United State – quantitative analyses of election returns, for example –were useless in analyzing the political activities of women, who were denied the vote until 1920. _________________
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Aug 2016, 23:52
4. According to the passage, Paula Baker and the new political historians of the 1960’s and 1970’s shared which of the following? (A) A commitment to interest-group politics (B) A disregard for political theory and ideology (C) An interest in the ways in which nineteenth-century politics prefigured contemporary politics (D) A reliance on such quatitiative techniques as the analysis of election returns (E) An emplasis on the political involvement of ordinary citizens
New political historians : by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens (to go beyond the traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions) excluding women
By redefining “political activity,” historian Paula Baker has developed a political history that includes women. so included women. so both - An emplasis on the political involvement of ordinary citizens
6. The information in the passage suggests that a pre1960’s political historian would have been most likely to undertake which of the following studies? (A) An analysis of voting trends among women voters of the 1920’s (B) A study of male voters’ gradual ideological shift from party politics to issue-oriented politics (C) A biography of an influential nineteenth-century minister of foreign affairs (D) An analysis of narratives written by previously unrecognized women activitists (E) A study of voting trends among naturalized immigrant laborers in a nineteenth-century logging camp
New political historians : by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens (to go beyond the traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions) excluding women => that indicates that a pre1960’s political historian was interested more in "leaders" and "government institute" so C.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Dec 2016, 22:17
Short passage but number of questions are more, Here are my answers 1. B 2. D 3. E 4. E 5. A 6. C..
Choose wrong option for question No. 3, thinking the passage quotes baker's directly in the second paragraph primarily for amplifying a definition given in the first paragraph... Made a mistake.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Dec 2016, 02:16
Can someone pls explain me "Like the old approach, however, this new approach excluded women' (para 1) .. I am not that great in grammer or language..so only thing i could understand was - 'new approach is similar to old approach'... What role does this word 'however' play here...To a layman, the use of this word seems redundant here...I saw this word being used in similar fashion in some other RC's also.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Dec 2017, 12:51
can an expert please explain how, for Q1, "B" is a better answer than "A"?
the reason i'm not completely sold on "B" is b/c it mentions A SCHOLARLY APPROACH, when paragraph 1 clearly notes TWO approaches -- a "new school" (in the 1960s & 1970s) AND a "traditional/old approach" (predates this). the difference between the two is clearly delineated: the "new" approach examines the political practices of ordinary citizens.
so, i can understand how the second part of "B" is correct -- it correctly mentions there's an alternative approach (Baker), BUT i don't like how it seems to consolidate the two views (elaborated above) into one.
the only reason i get rid of "A" is b/c there are no limitations associated with Baker. but both A/C seem odd...
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Dec 2017, 19:19
1
1
Quote:
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to (A) enumerate reason why both traditional scholarly methods and newer scholarly methods have limitations (B) identify a shortcoming in a scholarly approach and describe an alternative approach (C) provide empirical data to support a long-held scholarly assumption (D) compare two sholarly publications on the basis of their authors’ backgrounds (E) attempt to provide a partial answer to a lon-standing scholarly dilemna
LakerFan24 wrote:
can an expert please explain how, for Q1, "B" is a better answer than "A"?
the reason i'm not completely sold on "B" is b/c it mentions A SCHOLARLY APPROACH, when paragraph 1 clearly notes TWO approaches -- a "new school" (in the 1960s & 1970s) AND a "traditional/old approach" (predates this). the difference between the two is clearly delineated: the "new" approach examines the political practices of ordinary citizens.
so, i can understand how the second part of "B" is correct -- it correctly mentions there's an alternative approach (Baker), BUT i don't like how it seems to consolidate the two views (elaborated above) into one.
the only reason i get rid of "A" is b/c there are no limitations associated with Baker. but both A/C seem odd...
Yes, the passage mentions two scholarly approaches (one new and one old). But the author tells us that even the new scholarly approach has a shortcoming (the same shortcoming that the old one had).
The author basically says, "So, a new school emerged in the 60's and 70's. But even though it was DIFFERENT from the old approach, it still had the same shortcoming as the old approach." The author wants us to know that the new approach didn't address that shortcoming.
So the author's main purpose is to tell us that the second approach, though new and different, still had the same shortcoming. Although two approaches are mentioned, the author is primarily concerned with identifying the shortcoming of the second approach.
In general, when thinking about the purpose of each paragraph or of the passage, think about "why?", not "what?". Yes, the passage mentions two approaches, but is the shortcoming of the old approach central to the author's main purpose? For more help with RC problems, check out the Ultimate RC Guide for Beginners.
Need an expert reply? Hit the request verbal experts' reply button -- and please be specific about your question. Feel free to tag @GMATNinja and @GMATNinjaTwo in your post. Priority is always given to official GMAT questions.
6. The information in the passage suggests that a pre-1960’s political historian would have been most likely to undertake which of the following studies?
(A) An analysis of voting trends among women voters of the 1920’s (B) A study of male voters’ gradual ideological shift from party politics to issue-oriented politics (C) A biography of an influential nineteenth-century minister of foreign affairs (D) An analysis of narratives written by previously unrecognized women activists (E) A study of voting trends among naturalized immigrant laborers in a nineteenth-century logging camp
_________________
6. The information in the passage suggests that a pre-1960’s political historian would have been most likely to undertake which of the following studies?
(A) An analysis of voting trends among women voters of the 1920’s (B) A study of male voters’ gradual ideological shift from party politics to issue-oriented politics (C) A biography of an influential nineteenth-century minister of foreign affairs (D) An analysis of narratives written by previously unrecognized women activists (E) A study of voting trends among naturalized immigrant laborers in a nineteenth-century logging camp
This question is asking about political historians before the 1960s. The key to this question lies in the very first sentence of the passage:
Quote:
The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and 1970’s sought to go beyond the traditional focus of political historians on leaders and government institutions by examining directly the political practices of ordinary citizens.
This is saying that before the 1960s, political historians focused on leaders and government institutions, rather than ordinary citizens. So we want to look for an answer choice that talks about a political leader or government institution. Choice (C) fits this: A biography of an influential nineteenth-century minister of foreign affairs. Since this is about a political leader, it would be a typical study for a pre-1960s historian.
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 May 2018, 07:49
3. It can be inferred that the author of the passage quotes Baker directly in the second paragraph primarily in order to
(A) clarify a position before providing an alternative to that position (B) differentiate between a novel definition and traditional definitions (C) provide an example of a point agreed on by different generations of scholars (D) provide an example of the prose style of an important historian (E) amplify a definition given in the first paragraph Made a mistake here. Correct me if I'm wrong, but it's wrong because there is no actual definition given in the first paragraph.
gmatclubot
Re: The new school of political history that emerged in the 1960’s and &nbs
[#permalink]
28 May 2018, 07:49
close
