Oct 16 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Oct 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Does GMAT RC seem like an uphill battle? eGMAT is conducting a free webinar to help you learn reading strategies that can enable you to solve 700+ level RC questions with at least 90% accuracy in less than 10 days. Sat., Oct 19th at 7 am PDT Oct 20 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Oct 22 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT On Demand for $79. For a score of 4951 (from current actual score of 40+) AllInOne Standard & 700+ Level Questions (150 questions)
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 16 Apr 2010
Posts: 18

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2010, 13:25
Question Stats:
70% (02:05) correct 30% (02:21) wrong based on 1311 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58365

Re: Pls explain how to come up to the slolution
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2010, 13:54
kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 Given: \(\frac{K}{A}=\frac{5x}{3x}\) (where \(x\) is a positive integer) and \(\frac{5x10}{3x+10}=\frac{7}{5}\) > \(x=30\) > \(K=150\) and \(A=90\). Question: \((K10)(A+10)=?\) > \((K10)(A+10)=40\). Answer: C.
_________________




Current Student
Status: What's your raashee?
Joined: 12 Jun 2009
Posts: 1724
Location: United States (NC)
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Schools: UNC (KenanFlagler)  Class of 2013
WE: Programming (Computer Software)

Re: Pls explain how to come up to the slolution
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Jul 2010, 13:47
so before exchange ratio is 5x:3x (x basically cancels out but they might have 10:6, 15:9 etc. which reduces to 5:3) so after exchange we have 5x10:3x+10 = 7:5 You can represent this in fractions like: (5x10)/(3x+10) = 7/5 and cross multiply to get 25x50 = 21x + 70 > 4x = 120 x = 30 NOW 30 IS NOT THE ANSWER  that is the multiplier so you need to find the number of stamps in possession so... Kaye 7*30 =210 Alberto 5*30 = 150 210150 = 60 = D
_________________
If you like my answers please +1 kudos!




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58365

Re: Pls explain how to come up to the slolution
[#permalink]
Show Tags
28 Jul 2010, 06:51
shaselai wrote: i think the problem here is yes you get X=30 BUT the new result is the ratio 7x:5x where the +/ 10 has already been taken into account or maybe i am wrong...? Answer to this question is C (40), provided OA is wrong. When we write \(\frac{K}{A}=\frac{5x}{3x}\) it means that \(x\) is the multiple of the initial ratio of 5/3 and not 7/5. We found that \(x=30\): initially K had \(5*30=150\) stamps and now K has \(15010=140\) stamps. Initially A had \(3*30=90\) stamps and now A has \(90+10=100\) stamps. Current difference is \(140100=40\). Hope it's clear.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 15 Oct 2012
Posts: 15

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ratio
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jun 2013, 10:19
Throw x=30 back into the second equation you set up. That's the ratio after the transaction has taken place and the number of stamps is defined from that equation, not the first. Make sense?
x=30 5(30)10=140 3(50)+10=100
140100=40 stamps



Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 626
Location: India

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jun 2013, 21:13
kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 1. We know the initial ratio of the number of stamps. We can represent the initial number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had, as 5x and 3x resp 2. We can represent the final number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had as 5x10 and 3x + 10 resp. The final ratio is 5x10/3x+10 3. The final ratio is also given as 7:5 4. As (2) and (3) both represent the final ratio of number of stamps and so as both are equivalent we can equate the two. 5x10/ 3x+10 = 7/5 5. x=30 6. We now need to find out how many stamps Kaye and Alberto had after the gift. 7. Kaye had 5x10 = 140 stamps. Alberto had 3x10 = 100 stamps 8. So Kaye has 40 more stamps than Alberto after the gift. Correct choice is c.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman Sravna Test Prep http://www.sravnatestprep.comHolistic and Systematic Approach



Intern
Joined: 08 Sep 2012
Posts: 7

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Sep 2013, 13:16
kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 5+3 = 8 7+5= 12 LCM of 12 and 8 = 24 8*3 = 24. Thus (5*3) / (3*3) = 15/9 12*2 = 24. Thus (7*2) / (5*2) = 14/10 10 – 9 = 1unit What we need is 1410= 4 Therefore 10*4 = 40



Manager
Joined: 30 May 2013
Posts: 150
Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GPA: 3.82

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Mar 2014, 11:47
Initially their counts is 5x:3x
After K gave 10 stamps to A their new ratio is 7y:5y
i.e. 5x10=7yEq 1 3x+10=5y  eq 2
Solving eq 1 qnd 2 we get y=20
so from 2nd ratio
7*20  5 *20 = 40



SVP
Status: The Best Or Nothing
Joined: 27 Dec 2012
Posts: 1749
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

Re: Pls explain how to come up to the slolution
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Mar 2014, 22:06
Bunuel wrote: kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 Given: \(\frac{K}{A}=\frac{5x}{3x}\) (where \(x\) is a positive integer) and \(\frac{5x10}{3x+10}=\frac{7}{5}\) > \(x=30\) > \(K=150\) and \(A=90\). Question: \((K10)(A+10)=?\) > \((K10)(A+10)=40\). Answer: C. Once x = 30 is calculated, we require to calculate (5x10)  (3x+10) = 2x20 = 6020 = 40 = Answer = C
_________________
Kindly press "+1 Kudos" to appreciate



Intern
Joined: 21 Apr 2014
Posts: 39

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2015, 04:05
so you can think about it this way. For some number (x) Kaye had 5x stamps and Alberto had 3x then kaye gave 10 stamps and the ration became 7:5, we can turn this into an equation like so: (5x10)/(3x+10)=7/5 cross multiplying gives us: 21x+70=25x50 or 120=4x x=30 but remember, we are trying to figure out how many more stamps kaye had than alberto after she gave him ten. originally, kaye had 150 stamps and alberto had 90 then she gave alberto 10, so she had 140 and he had 100 the difference is 40 stamps (C)
_________________



Intern
Joined: 15 Feb 2015
Posts: 9

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Mar 2015, 19:37
Bunuel wrote: Given: \(\frac{K}{A}=\frac{5x}{3x}\) (where \(x\) is a positive integer) and \(\frac{5x10}{3x+10}=\frac{7}{5}\) > \(x=30\) > \(K=150\) and \(A=90\).
Hi Bunuel, I find your method above a very elegant way to convert a 2 variable (K, A) problem into 1 variable (X). It is clearly the same as saying: \(\frac{K}{A}=\frac{5}{3}\) and \(\frac{K10}{A+10}=\frac{7}{5}\) but I find your way much clearer and straighforward (no factions, one eq, etc). Would you recommend to apply this in ALL (or most, at least) ratio problems?My doubt is that, under time pressure, adding an extra variable (X) may not seem the best idea at first glance, as it actually is. Thank you in advance.



Senior Manager
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 280
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37 GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36 GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2016, 11:54
Hi all the above methods would take close to 2.5 min as the timer above suggests. The problem is easy but time consuming. Kudos to the one who can suggest a shorter solution! thanks! If i had to triage that in 30 secs I would kick out B, D and E because they are all the multiples of 15 = 5*3. Choosing between 20 and 40 I would pick C and hit next because the odds for correct answers are on C answers
_________________



Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 9701
Location: Pune, India

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Feb 2016, 00:10
kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 Another method is to use ratios: Note that the total number of stamps is the same in both the cases. On ratio scale, 5:3 gives 8 total stamps while 7:5 gives 12 total stamps. So total stamps must be at least LCM of 8 and 12 i.e. 24. So in first case, Kaye had 15 stamps while Alberto had 9. After the exchange, Kaye had 14 stamps while Alberto had 10. So Kaye gave 1 stamp to Alberto. But actually, Kaye gave 10 stamps to Alberto. So actual total number of stamps is 240. So the multiplier of 7:5 is 20 (because 12*20 = 240). Kaye had (75)*20 = 40 more stamps than Alberto. Answer (C)
_________________
Karishma Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Learn more about how Veritas Prep can help you achieve a great GMAT score by checking out their GMAT Prep Options >



Senior Manager
Joined: 15 Oct 2015
Posts: 299
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GPA: 3.93
WE: Account Management (Education)

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
15 Mar 2016, 06:58
Bunuel wrote: shaselai wrote: i think the problem here is yes you get X=30 BUT the new result is the ratio 7x:5x where the +/ 10 has already been taken into account or maybe i am wrong...? Answer to this question is C (40), provided OA is wrong. When we write \(\frac{K}{A}=\frac{5x}{3x}\) it means that \(x\) is the multiple of the initial ratio of 5/3 and not 7/5. We found that \(x=30\): initially K had \(5*30=150\) stamps and now K has \(15010=140\) stamps. Initially A had \(3*30=90\) stamps and now A has \(90+10=100\) stamps. Current difference is \(140100=40\). Hope it's clear. Sometimes you wonder what quant section would be like without Bunuel. The first solution to the post was ultimately wrong, but inexplicably, hapless folks like me were falling over themselves giving it kudos. Tis terrific how GMAT tests the neatness of ones reasoning.



Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Posts: 2514
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.92
WE: General Management (Transportation)

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
09 Apr 2016, 14:04
kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 K/A = 5/3 (K10)/(A+10) = 7/5 K=5A/3 K10=(7A+70)/5 5K=7A+120 25A/3 = 7A+120 multiply by 3 25A=21A+360 4A=360 A=90 since A = 90, then K = 150 A+10=100; K10=140 140100=40 C=40.



Intern
Joined: 06 May 2016
Posts: 14
WE: Education (Education)

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 May 2016, 14:11
Similar solution to what has already been posted but I find it slightly easier to understand (maybe that's because it's what I did Given5A = 3K 7*(A+10) = 5*(K10) Expand and solve simultaneously 7*(A+10) = 5*(K10).........7A + 70 = 5K  50.........7A = 5K  120..........35A = 25K  600 5A = 3K .............................................................................35A = 21K Subtract to find that 4K = 600......K = 150 Apply the ratio ..........K ......... A ..........5 ..........3 ..........150 .......90 Gift ....10 .......+10 ..........140 ......100 Difference ....40.... (C) (Test: new ratio is 14:10 i.e 7:5)



Manager
Joined: 13 Jun 2016
Posts: 95
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Technology

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Aug 2016, 10:32
40 is another game where you don't read the question carefuly. The question is asking after the exchange



Intern
Joined: 18 May 2016
Posts: 34

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2016, 06:53
Bunuel Hi, In his answer to the question, thenumberofstampsthatkayeandalbertohadwereinthe98116.html#p755395, Bunuel writes (5x10)/(3x+10)=7/5 and not (5x10)/(3x+10)=7y/5y Why not? Why does he directly simplify the y's there?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58365

The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2016, 06:57
plalud wrote: Bunuel Hi, In his answer to the question, http://gmatclub.com/forum/thenumberof ... ml#p755395, Bunuel writes (5x10)/(3x+10)=7/5 and not (5x10)/(3x+10)=7y/5y Why not? Why does he directly simplify the y's there? \(\frac{7y}{5y} = \frac{7}{5}\), because y is reduced.
_________________



GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 4003
Location: Canada

Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
11 Oct 2016, 09:09
kilukilam wrote: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the ration of 5:3 respecctively. After Kaye gave Alberto 10 of her stamps, the ration of the number of Kaye had to the number of Alberto had was 7:5. As a result of the gift, Kaye had how many more stamps than Alberto
A. 20 B. 30 C. 40 D. 60 E. 90 One option is to solve the question using TWO VARIABLES. Let K = # of stamps K had after the exchangeLet A = # of stamps A had after the exchangeThis means that K+10 = # of stamps K had before the exchange This means that A10 = # of stamps A had before the exchange Note: Our goal is to find the value of KA The number of stamps that K and A (originally) had were in the ratio 5:3So, (K+10)/(A10) = 5/3 We want a prettier equation, so let's cross multiply to get 3(K+10) = 5(A10) Expand: 3K + 30 = 5A  50 Rearrange: 3K  5A = 80After K gave A 10 of her stamps, the ratio of the number K had to the number A had was 7:5So, K/A = 7/5 We want a prettier equation, so let's cross multiply to get 5K = 7A Rearrange to get: 5K  7A = 0At this point we have two equations: 5K  7A = 03K  5A = 80Our goal is to find the value of K  A. IMPORTANT: We need not solve for the individual values of K and A. This is great, because something nice happens when we subtract the blue equation from the red equation. We get: 2K  2A = 80 Now divide both sides by 2 to get: K  A = 40 Answer: Cheers, Brent
_________________
Test confidently with gmatprepnow.com




Re: The number of stamps that Kaye and Alberto had were in the
[#permalink]
11 Oct 2016, 09:09



Go to page
1 2
Next
[ 31 posts ]



