Bunuel
Competition Mode Question
The only motives that influence all human actions arise from self-interest. It is clear, therefore, that self-interest is the chief influence on human action.
The reasoning in the argument is fallacious because the argument
(A) denies that an observation that a trait is common to all the events in a pattern can contribute to a causal explanation of the pattern
(B) takes the occurrence of one particular influence on a patterns or classes of events as showing that its influence outweighs any other influence on those events
(C) concludes that a characteristic of pattern or class of events at one time is characteristic of similar patterns or classes of events at all times
(D) concludes that because an influence is the paramount influence on a particular pattern or class of events, that influence is the only influence on the pattern or class of events
(E) undermines its own premise that a particular attribute is present in all instances of a certain pattern or class of events
Premise: The only motives that influence all human actions arise from self-interest.
Say there are 3 motives that influence ALL human actions - money, power and self-worth
There could be other motives also that influence some of the human actions (but not all actions) - say these motives are sympathy for fellow beings, love etc.
But the premise tells that the motives that influence all of the actions arise from self-interest. So money, power and self-worth arise from self-interest.
Conclusion of the author: Self-interest is the chief influence on human action.
Just because self interest influences EVERY action, it doesn't mean that it is the chief influence on every action. Love could be the chief influence on some actions. Sympathy could be the chief influence on some other actions etc.
So why is the conclusion wrong?
(B) It takes the occurrence of one particular influence on a patterns or classes of events as showing that its influence outweighs any other influence on those events.Makes sense right? Since self-interest influences the human action, the author is showing that it is the main influence on human action i.e. itn influence outweighs all the influences.
Answer (B)